Synopsis
Though, ketamine possess
rapid antidepressant properties, its use is limited due to addictive and
psychotomimetic properties. In the current study, we have evaluated the
antidepressant activity of lanicemine in CUMS model of depression by 1H-[13C]-NMR
spectroscopy together with infusion of [1,6-13C2]glucose. Exposure of lanicemine restored behavioral
phenotype and activity of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in depression.Introduction
Depression is second most disabling disease and
leading cause of suicidality worldwide
1. Popular antidepressants
developed based on monoamine theory have limitations of low recovery rate and long
remission time
2. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has been
shown to restore behavioral phenotype and brain energy metabolism in social
defeat model of depression
3. However, its use as antidepressant is
limited due to addictive and psychotomimetic properties
4. Lanicemine
(AZD6765), a low trapping NMDA channel blocker, is safer in comparison with
ketamine
5. However, very little information is available for its
antidepressant mechanism. The major objective of the current study was to
evaluate effects of lanicemine on behavior and neurometabolism in chronic unpredictable
mild stress (CUMS) model of depression.
Materials and Methods
All animal experiments were performed under
approved protocols by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of CCMB. C57BL/6J mice (2
month old) were divided into following groups: (A) Control + Normal Saline (Cont + NS,
n=6); (b) Control + Lanicemine (Cont + Azd, n=6); (c) CUMS + Normal Saline
(Cums + NS, n=6); (d) CUMS + Lanicemine (Cums + Azd, n=6). Group (c) and (d)
mice were subjected to CUMS paradigm for 21 days by subjecting them to varieties
of stress twice daily for three weeks
6. At the end of the CUMS protocol,
mice in Group (b) and (d) received lanicemine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) thrice in a
week for 2 weeks, while that in Group (a) and (c) received 0.25 ml normal saline (0.9%
NaCl) for the same duration. Depression phenotype was evaluated by sucrose
preference
7 and forced swim test
8. For assessment of
metabolic activity, urethane (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) anesthetized mice were infused with [1,6-
13C
2]glucose
for 10 min, and head was frozen in liq. nitrogen. Metabolites were
extracted from frozen prefrontal cortical tissue. The concentration and
13C
labeling of metabolites were measured in
1H-[
13C]-NMR
spectra of tissue extracts recorded at 600 MHz Bruker Avance II NMR
spectrometer
9. The cerebral metabolic
rates of glucose oxidation by glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in prefrontal cortex were
determined from the
13C labeling of amino acids from [1,6-
13C
2]glucose
10.
Results and Discussions
Mice exposed to CUMS paradigm exhibit
significant reduction in sucrose preference (Cont + NS: 84.1±4.3 %,
CUMS + NS: 62±2.5 %, p<0.01), and increase in immobility time in forced
swim test (Cont + NS: 33.7±2 s, CUMS + NS: 80.8±3 s, p<0.01). The lanicemine
treatment in CUMS mice was able to restore sucrose preference, and immobility
time to the control values (Fig. 1). The
13C labeling of glutamate-C4
(p<0.01), GABA-C2 (p<0.01), glutamine-C4 (p<0.01) and
aspartate-C3 (p<0.05) was decreased significantly in CUMS mice (Fig. 2,
Table 1). The reduction in
13C
labeling of amino acids from [1,6-
13C
2]glucose indicates decreased metabolic activity of glutamatergic
(CUMS: 0.19±0.02; Cont: 0.28±0.02 μmol/g/min, p<0.01) and GABAergic neurons (CUMS:
0.04±0.003; Cont: 0.07±0.003 μmol/g/min, p<0.01)
in CUMS mice (Fig. 3). Interestingly, lanicemine intervention for two weeks period restored the
amino acids labeling to the control values (Fig. 2, Table 1). Additionally, the cerebral
metabolic rates of glucose oxidation by glutamatergic (CUMS + lanicemine:
0.29±0.01; Cont + lanicemine: 0.29±0.01 μmol/g/min, p=0.89) and GABAergic neurons (CUMS +
lanicemine: 0.06±0.004; Cont + lanicemine: 0.06±0.001 μmol/g/min, p=0.89) were found to be restored to
the control levels after lanicemine intervention (Fig. 3). These data provide an experimental
evidence for the restoration of behavioral phenotype, and activity of excitatory
and inhibitory neurons with lanicemine in depression. Further, investigations
on astroglial metabolic activity may be useful to elaborate the detailed mechanism
of action of lanicemine.
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by funding from Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR4019/Med/30/675/2011),
Government of India.References
1. Ferrari et al
(2013) Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Medicine 10(1001547):1.
2. Insel et al
(2009) The STAR*D trial: revealing the need for better treatments. Psychiatry Services 60:1466.
3. Mishra and Patel (2014)
Evaluation of Efficacy of Ketamine for the Treatment of
Depression like Phenotype in Mouse Model: A 1H-[13C]-NMR
study. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 22:2974.
4. aan het Rot et
al (2012) Ketamine for depression: where do we go from here? Biol Psychiatry 72:537.
5. Zarate et al
(2013) A randomized trial of a low-trapping nonselective N-methyl-D-aspartate channel blocker in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 74:257.
6. Willner et al
(1992) Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia: a realistic animal model of depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16:525.
7. Krishnan et al
(2007) Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 131:391.
8. Slattery and Cryan
(2012) Using the rat forced swim test to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents. Nature Protocols 7:1009.
9. de Graaf et al (2003)
Detection of [1,6-13C2]-glucose metabolism in rat brain by in vivo 1H-[13C]-NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 49:37.
10. Patel et al (2005) The contribution of GABA to glutamate/glutamine cycling and energy metabolism in the rat cortex in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5588.