A 1H-[13C]-NMR Study for Understanding Antidepressant Action of Lanicemine in Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress Model of Depression
Pravin K Mishra1 and Anant Bahadur Patel1

1NMR Microimaging and Spectroscopy, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India

Synopsis

Though, ketamine possess rapid antidepressant properties, its use is limited due to addictive and psychotomimetic properties. In the current study, we have evaluated the antidepressant activity of lanicemine in CUMS model of depression by 1H-[13C]-NMR spectroscopy together with infusion of [1,6-13C2]glucose. Exposure of lanicemine restored behavioral phenotype and activity of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in depression.

Introduction

Depression is second most disabling disease and leading cause of suicidality worldwide1. Popular antidepressants developed based on monoamine theory have limitations of low recovery rate and long remission time2. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has been shown to restore behavioral phenotype and brain energy metabolism in social defeat model of depression3. However, its use as antidepressant is limited due to addictive and psychotomimetic properties4. Lanicemine (AZD6765), a low trapping NMDA channel blocker, is safer in comparison with ketamine5. However, very little information is available for its antidepressant mechanism. The major objective of the current study was to evaluate effects of lanicemine on behavior and neurometabolism in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) model of depression.

Materials and Methods

All animal experiments were performed under approved protocols by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of CCMB. C57BL/6J mice (2 month old) were divided into following groups: (A) Control + Normal Saline (Cont + NS, n=6); (b) Control + Lanicemine (Cont + Azd, n=6); (c) CUMS + Normal Saline (Cums + NS, n=6); (d) CUMS + Lanicemine (Cums + Azd, n=6). Group (c) and (d) mice were subjected to CUMS paradigm for 21 days by subjecting them to varieties of stress twice daily for three weeks6. At the end of the CUMS protocol, mice in Group (b) and (d) received lanicemine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) thrice in a week for 2 weeks, while that in Group (a) and (c) received 0.25 ml normal saline (0.9% NaCl) for the same duration. Depression phenotype was evaluated by sucrose preference7 and forced swim test8. For assessment of metabolic activity, urethane (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) anesthetized mice were infused with [1,6-13C2]glucose for 10 min, and head was frozen in liq. nitrogen. Metabolites were extracted from frozen prefrontal cortical tissue. The concentration and 13C labeling of metabolites were measured in 1H-[13C]-NMR spectra of tissue extracts recorded at 600 MHz Bruker Avance II NMR spectrometer9. The cerebral metabolic rates of glucose oxidation by glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in prefrontal cortex were determined from the 13C labeling of amino acids from [1,6-13C2]glucose10.

Results and Discussions

Mice exposed to CUMS paradigm exhibit significant reduction in sucrose preference (Cont + NS: 84.1±4.3 %, CUMS + NS: 62±2.5 %, p<0.01), and increase in immobility time in forced swim test (Cont + NS: 33.7±2 s, CUMS + NS: 80.8±3 s, p<0.01). The lanicemine treatment in CUMS mice was able to restore sucrose preference, and immobility time to the control values (Fig. 1). The 13C labeling of glutamate-C4 (p<0.01), GABA-C2 (p<0.01), glutamine-C4 (p<0.01) and aspartate-C3 (p<0.05) was decreased significantly in CUMS mice (Fig. 2, Table 1). The reduction in 13C labeling of amino acids from [1,6-13C2]glucose indicates decreased metabolic activity of glutamatergic (CUMS: 0.19±0.02; Cont: 0.28±0.02 μmol/g/min, p<0.01) and GABAergic neurons (CUMS: 0.04±0.003; Cont: 0.07±0.003 μmol/g/min, p<0.01) in CUMS mice (Fig. 3). Interestingly, lanicemine intervention for two weeks period restored the amino acids labeling to the control values (Fig. 2, Table 1). Additionally, the cerebral metabolic rates of glucose oxidation by glutamatergic (CUMS + lanicemine: 0.29±0.01; Cont + lanicemine: 0.29±0.01 μmol/g/min, p=0.89) and GABAergic neurons (CUMS + lanicemine: 0.06±0.004; Cont + lanicemine: 0.06±0.001 μmol/g/min, p=0.89) were found to be restored to the control levels after lanicemine intervention (Fig. 3). These data provide an experimental evidence for the restoration of behavioral phenotype, and activity of excitatory and inhibitory neurons with lanicemine in depression. Further, investigations on astroglial metabolic activity may be useful to elaborate the detailed mechanism of action of lanicemine.

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by funding from Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR4019/Med/30/675/2011), Government of India.

References

1. Ferrari et al (2013) Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Medicine 10(1001547):1.

2. Insel et al (2009) The STAR*D trial: revealing the need for better treatments. Psychiatry Services 60:1466.

3. Mishra and Patel (2014) Evaluation of Efficacy of Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression like Phenotype in Mouse Model: A 1H-[13C]-NMR study. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 22:2974.

4. aan het Rot et al (2012) Ketamine for depression: where do we go from here? Biol Psychiatry 72:537.

5. Zarate et al (2013) A randomized trial of a low-trapping nonselective N-methyl-D-aspartate channel blocker in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 74:257.

6. Willner et al (1992) Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia: a realistic animal model of depression. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16:525.

7. Krishnan et al (2007) Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 131:391.

8. Slattery and Cryan (2012) Using the rat forced swim test to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents. Nature Protocols 7:1009.

9. de Graaf et al (2003) Detection of [1,6-13C2]-glucose metabolism in rat brain by in vivo 1H-[13C]-NMR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 49:37.

10. Patel et al (2005) The contribution of GABA to glutamate/glutamine cycling and energy metabolism in the rat cortex in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5588.

Figures

Fig. 1: Effects of lanicemine on (i) Sucrose Preference, (ii) Forced Swim Test in CUMS mice.

Fig. 2: 1H-[13C]-NMR spectra depicting: (A) Total concentration, (B) 13C labeling of metabolites in prefrontal cortex from [1,6-13C2]glucose in different group of mice.

Table 1: Concentration of 13C labeled amino acids following 10 min [1,6-13C2]glucose infusion under different interventions.

Fig. 3: Effects of lanicemine on cerebral metabolic rate of glucose oxidation by glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in CUMS and control mice.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0108