Franciszek Hennel1 and Klaas P. Pruessmann1
1Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Synopsis
Classically
encoded MRI signals are complex and therefore sensitive to uncontrolled phase
variations. We propose an alternative spatial encoding method which leads to real positive
signals and allows phase fluctuations to be removed by a simple magnitude
calculation before the Fourier transform. The phase immunity of the method is
demonstrated by recovering an image from a scan with unknown random receiver
phase.Introduction
The MRI
signal represents a scalar product of the object with a set of encoding
functions
1. The signal is complex because the
encoding functions – in the simplest case, plane waves created by spin precession
under field gradients – have real and imaginary components (the object itself can
be made real by a spin echo sequence). Consequently, the phase of the signal is
important for the reconstruction process and any uncontrolled phase changes,
e.g. those induced by object motion result in image artefacts. We explore an
alternative way of spatial encoding which produces real positive (phaseless)
signals. Spurious phase components can be removed by taking the absolute value of
the signal before the Fourier transform.
The Method
In a 2d
spin-echo imaging sequence the phase encoding gradient pulse (y) has been moved
from its usual position into a preparation sequence where it is flanked by two
RF pulses of flip angle $$$\alpha$$$ and followed by a spoiler (Fig.1). Now,
the excitation pulse hits a z-magnetization which is already spatially
modulated by $$$ S \cos(2\pi k_y y) + C
$$$ or by $$$ S \sin(2\pi k_y y) +
C $$$, with the two $$$\alpha$$$-pulses having opposite or
orthogonal phases, respectively, and where $$$ C=\cos^2(\alpha) $$$ and $$$
S=\sin^2(\alpha) $$$. Each phase encoding step is repeated with both phase
shifts and the corresponding echoes are Fourier-transformed along the readout
direction (x). The resulting profiles are
$$ s_a(x,k_y) = e^{i\phi_a} \int \rho (x,y)
\left[ C\cos(2\pi k_y y)+S \right] dy $$
$$ s_b(x,k_y) = e^{i\phi_b} \int \rho (x,y)
\left[ C\sin(2\pi k_y y)+S \right] dy $$
The
uncontrolled phase shifts $$$\phi_a$$$ and $$$\phi_b$$$ may by different in each
step and may also depend on x. Since the “object” $$$\rho(x,y)$$$ is real (spin
echo), the function under the integral
is real positive when $$$ \alpha < 45^\circ $$$, and we can remove the phase
modulations by taking the absolute value. The profiles are thus combined:
$$ s(x,k_y)=
\left| s_a(x,k_y) \right|+i\left| s_b(x,k_y) \right| $$
and Fourier
transformed along y to give the final image
$$ \tilde{\rho}(x,y)=C\rho(x,y)+(1+i)
S \delta(y)\int \rho(x,y)dy $$
The central
line of this image contains a projection artefact, which can be removed by
fitting a constant offset in high $$$k_y$$$ regions of each profile and subtracting
it before the second FT.
Results
An
experimental proof of principle of the phaseless encoding was carried out on a
phantom using a 3T MRI system (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). This
system applies a random receiver phase cycle throughout encoding steps, which
is normally demodulated by the reconstruction, and which was treated as unknown
in our experiment. An acquisition with the classic phase encoding was compared
with the proposed method. The classic phase-encoded data reconstructed by 2DFT
shows ghosting due to the uncorrected receiver phase cycle (Fig. 2A). An
attempt to remove the random phase by taking the absolute value after the FT
along x and before the FT along y fails of course (Fig.2B), since the
information contained in the phase is lost. However, the phaseless encoded data
processed as described above produces a correct image with only a residual
artefact along the central line (Fig.2C).
Discussion and Conclusions
Phaseless
encoding makes the reconstruction independent of the global (and to limited
extend, local) phase fluctuations between encoding steps. It may find
applications in diffusion-weighted MRI, where such fluctuations arise due to
object displacement in the presence of diffusion gradients
2. It could also allow direct signal
sampling without the burden of phase locking to the transmitter
3. The tradeoff is a reduction of the
signal-to-noise ratio per scan time, which is four-fold in the optimal case of
45⁰ preparation pulses, as well as an enhanced dependence of image intensity on
RF field amplitude (via the S coefficient). It should be noted that real-valued encoding
functions such as Hadamard
4 or wavelets
5, which have been used in the past
for the purpose of improved spatial response or scan time reduction, would not allow
a phase-immune reconstruction from signal magnitude.
Acknowledgements
References
1.
K.
P. Pruessmann, NMR Biomed. 19, 288–299, 2006.
2.
D.
G. Norris, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 13, 486–495, 2001.
3.
Jesmanowicz
A, Hyde JS, ISMRM 2006, p. 2027.
4.
Souza
SP. et al, J. Comp. Assist.
Tomography 12, 1988
5.
J.
B. Weaver, et al. Magn. Reson. Med., 24, 275–287,
1992.