Xiaowei Zhuang1, Zhengshi Yang1, Tim Curran2, and Dietmar Cordes1,2
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
A family constrained CCA (cCCA) method was
introduced to improve the accuracy of activation detection in noisy fMRI data.
The cCCA was converted into a constrained multivariate multiple regression problem and solved
efficiently with a numerical optimization algorithm. Results from both
simulated data and real episodic memory data indicated that a higher detection
sensitivity for a fixed specificity can be achieved with the proposed cCCA
method as compared to the widely used mass-univariate or other conventional
multivariate (CCA) approaches.Introduction
Local canonical correlation analysis (CCA)
1
using three spatially constrained models (non-negative constraint, sum
constraint and max constraint) has been investigated previously to
increase the accuracy of activation detection in fMRI data
2,3,4.
However, better detection accuracy could be achieved by applying a
more flexible constrained CCA model. This study introduces a family-constrained CCA method indexed by
parameters $$$p$$$ and $$$\Psi$$$ (abbreviated as cCCA) which is solved
efficiently using numerical optimization theory.
Methods
Model: Let $$$Y
= (Y_1,…,Y_m) \in R^m$$$ be a vector representing time courses (tc) of $$$m$$$ voxels ($$$m$$$=9 for 3 x 3 regions in a 2D slice),
and
$$$X = (X_1,…,X_n) \in R^n$$$ represents $$$n$$$ functions used to model the BOLD response.
Using proposed cCCA, coefficients $$$\alpha \in R^m$$$ and
$$$\beta \in R^n$$$ of $$$Y$$$ and $$$X$$$ are found by maximizing the
canonical correlation coefficient $$$\rho(Y\alpha,X\beta)
= \frac{cov(Y’\alpha,X’\beta)}{\sqrt{var(Y’\alpha)var(X’\beta)}}$$$, with spatial constraints $$$\alpha_1^p\geq\psi\sum_{k=2}^{m}\alpha_k^p$$$;
$$$ \alpha_k>0, \forall k$$$; $$$\beta_j\neq 0, \forall j$$$; where $$$\alpha_1$$$ specifies the weight of the center voxel and $$$\alpha_n,n>1$$$ represent
the weights of the other 8 neighboring voxels in a 3*3 voxel grid. The 3 known
models
2, 3, 4 are included in this new family model for fixed
parameters $$$p$$$ and $$$\Psi$$$: (a) non-negative cCCA:$$$p=1,
\Psi=0$$$; (b) sum constraint cCCA: $$$p=1,
\Psi=1$$$ and (c) max constraint cCCA:$$$p = \infty, \Psi
= 1$$$. In this new model,
a larger $$$\Psi$$$ indicates a higher contribution of the center
voxel, leading to the univariate solution when $$$\Psi = \infty$$$; whereas an increase of $$$p$$$ guarantees a higher contribution of
neighboring voxels. The solution is obtained by converting cCCA into a
constrained multivariate multiple regression problem and solving it with the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno
(BFGS)
5 optimization algorithm.
Imaging: fMRI data (3.0T, TR/TE/FOV = 2s/30ms/22cm×22cm, 25 slices,
coronal oblique, thickness/gap=4.0 mm/1.0 mm, resolution 96×96, 288 time
frames) from six normal subjects (4-males/2-females, age: 30-36) each consisting
of a resting-state dataset and a memory task dataset were analyzed. The memory
task involves viewing faces paired with occupations and contained instruction,
encoding, recognition and control (distraction) periods.
Validation with Simulated
data: Simulated data were generated on a 32*32 grid and activation pattern
for each 3*3 local neighborhood with an active center following the empirical
distribution of the real data by applying mass-univariate analysis for encoding v/s control contrast. To achieve a realistic noise distribution , wavelet-resampled resting-state tc were added to the true activated tc (p<1e-10
uncorrected)
6, with a noise fraction $$$f$$$ that was close to the real data ($$$f=0.65$$$ in our case). Both cCCA and conventional fMRI
analysis techniques were applied to the simulated data and receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the activation detection performance.
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated within the range of false
positive rate (FPR) from 0 to 0.1
4.
Validation with real data: cCCA with optimal $$$p$$$ and $$$\Psi$$$ was finally used to analyze the real data and
compared with other conventional fMRI analysis techniques.
Statistical Analysis: Wilk’s lambda statistics
7 was used
to determine whether the center voxel was active for a specific contrast $$$C$$$. Statistical threshold for significance
was obtained by repeating the above analysis on the wavelet-resampled resting-state
data 100 times until a stable null statistics was achieved.
Results
Fig.1 shows the simulated ground truth and activation
patterns (p<0.01, uncorrected) using different methods. AUC calculated from
the simulated data are listed in Table.1. Optimum combination of cCCA is
obtained at $$$p=1, \Psi=2$$$, which increases the AUC by 10.29% as compared
to the univariate analysis. Strong block artifacts indicating higher FPR are
also observed in the unconstrained and non-negative constrained CCA (Fig.1).
Whole brain activation t-map for real episodic memory data with contrast encoding
v/s control is shown in Fig.2 (p<0.05, FWE). Significant activations are
observed in hippocampus using our cCCA method with optimal parameters. A CPU
time of less than two hours to analyze an entire brain dataset is achieved with
the proposed cCCA method.
Discussion
In fMRI analysis, widely used mass-univariate
approach usually detects fewer artifacts but also less activation. Conventional
CCA is highly sensitive to activations but also produces a low specificity if no
proper constraint is applied. The optimum combination $$$(p,\Psi)$$$ cCCA
incorporates local information while keeping the center voxel to be dominant
(with largest weight). Our method is able to detect activation more accurately
while reaching nearly identical sensitivity as conventional CCA but with a
higher specificity.
Conclusion
A new family constrained local CCA model is introduced
and efficiently solved. Higher detection accuracy for a fixed specificity is
obtained with this cCCA model with both simulated and real fMRI data.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the NIH (grant number 7R01EB014284).References
1. Hotelling H.,
1936, Biometrika. 2. Friman O et al., 2001, Magn Reson Med. 3. Friman O et al.,
2003, NeuroImage. 4. Cordes D et al., 2012, Human Brain Mapping. 5. Nocedal J
et al., 2006, Springer Science Business Media LLC. 6. Nandy R et al., 2007, NeuroImage.
7. Mardia KV et al., 1979, Academic Press.