Timothy J Colgan1,2, Diego Hernando1, Samir D Sharma1, Ann Shimakawa3, and Scott B Reeder1,2,4,5,6
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 2Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 3Global Applied Science Lab, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 4Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 5Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 6Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
Quantitative chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI
techniques acquire complex-valued (magnitude and phase) images at multiple echo
times (TE), enabling simultaneous mapping of fat-fraction, R2* (=1/T2*) and B0
field. Applications of CSE-MRI include tissue fat quantification, iron
quantification and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).
Recently, phase shifts due to concomitant
gradients (CG) have been identified as a source of error for quantitative
CSE techniques, so their effects on fat-fraction, R2* and B0
maps are characterized in this study.
CG correction of experimental data demonstrates that
the detrimental effects of CG phase shifts can be removed before reconstruction
to produce more accurate estimates of the fat-fraction, R2*, and field map measurements.
Purpose
Quantitative chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI
techniques acquire complex-valued (magnitude and phase) images at multiple echo
times (TE), enabling simultaneous mapping of fat-fraction, R2* (=1/T2*) and B
0
field. Applications of CSE-MRI include tissue fat quantification, iron
quantification and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). However, these
techniques are vulnerable to unanticipated phase shifts in the acquired CSE
images. Recently, phase shifts due to concomitant gradients (CG) [1] have been
identified as a source of error for quantitative CSE techniques [2], however
their effects on fat-fraction, R2* and B
0 maps are not well
understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the effect
of phase shifts due to CGs on CSE-based fat-fraction, R2* and B
0
measurements, at both 1.5T and 3T
Methods
In this study the phase shifts due to CGs were
analyzed for different versions of a multi-echo gradient-echo pulse sequence: a
monopolar flyback single echo train, monopolar flyback with two interleaved echo
trains, and a bipolar single echo train, as shown in Fig. 1. The phase shifts
due to CGs can be calculated from the known gradients [1]. Simulations were used to characterize the CG
phase shifts and experimental measurements were used to demonstrate the
correction of these shifts before parameter estimation.
Simulations
In our 3T simulations, complex data from a homogeneous water
signal (fat-fraction=0%) were synthesized, and CG phase shifts were added. Representative CG phase shifts were
calculated using gradients for a 3D six-echo CSE gradient echo sequence with an
axial acquisition and a 48 cm z-axis field of view (FOV) for the three waveforms
shown in Fig. 1. Subsequently, a complex fitting algorithm [3] was used to
estimate the fat-fraction, R2*, and B0 field map.
MRI Measurements
Measurements were made on a 1.5T Signa HDxt GE scanner and a
3T Discovery MR 750 GE scanner using an 8-channel and 32-channel torso coil,
respectively. A NiCl2 and NaCl doped-water phantom with 0% fat-fraction
and homogenous R2* was scanned. At 3T, the scan was performed with FOV=210 x
210 x 480 cm (X x Y x Z), 6 echoes, TE1=1.2ms, and ∆TE=0.97ms. At 1.5T two acquisitions with interleaved
echo trains were made sequentially, one
with FOV=210 x 210 x 480 cm, 6 echoes, TE1=1.2ms,
and ∆TE=0.98ms
and a second with FOV=350 x 350 x 480 cm, 6 echoes, TE1=0.9ms, and ∆TE=0.70ms.
The strategy behind these two scans was to maintain the same B0
field since the true field map inhomogeneity is unknown. This was accomplished by keeping the
pre-scans and shims constant. Changing the FOV with the back to back scans
results in different CG phase shifts and will produce different estimates of
the field maps from the raw
data.
Next, the CG phase shifts were calculated
numerically using the known gradient waveforms. Then the fat-fraction and R2*
maps were calculated from the raw data and data with the calculated CG phase shifts
removed. At 1.5T, field maps were estimated from both sets of raw data and
after the corresponding CG phase shifts were removed.
Results
Fig. 2a demonstrates that two interleaved echo
trains leads to a nonlinear accumulation of phase error, whereas the other
sequences accumulate error linearly with respect to echo number. These simulations
demonstrate that the fat-fraction in Fig. 2a and R2* in Fig. 2b are only affected
with a two shot interleaved acquisition, but significant errors accumulate in
the B
0 field map estimate in Fig. 1d for all acquisition types. The phantom experiments demonstrate that CG
correction also results in improved estimates of the fat-fraction (Figs. 3a and
4), and R2* (Fig. 3b) for this phantom. Fig. 3c also demonstrates that CGs
distort the field map estimate differently depending on the FOV, but removal of
CG phase shifts in the sequential scans results in similar field maps with only
a small constant offset.
Discussion & Conclusions
Nonlinear phase errors that result from interleaved
echo train acquisitions will corrupt the simultaneous estimation of fat-fraction
and R2*. These changes can be relatively
large at off-isocenter locations (eg. >10% fat-fraction as shown in Fig. 4).
CG correction of experimental data demonstrates that the detrimental effects of
CG phase shifts can be removed before reconstruction to produce more accurate estimates
of the fat-fraction, R2*, and field map measurements.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge support form the
NIH (UL1TR00427, R01 DK083380, R01 DK088925, R01 DK100651, and K24 DK102595),
GE Healthcare, and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of
Health under Award Number T32CA009206.References
[1] Bernstein M, Zhou X, Polzin J, King K, Ganin A, Pelc N,
Glover G, Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and
correction, Magn Reson Med 1998;39:300-8.
[2] Ruschke S, Eggers H, Kooijman H, Baum T, Settles M,
Haase A, Rummeny E, Karampinos D, Addressing phase errors in quantitative
water-fat imaging at 3 T using a time-interleaved multi-echo gradient-echo
acquisition, In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM,
Toronto, Canada, 2015. Abstract 3657.
[3] Hernando D, Kellman P, Haldar J, Liang Z, Robust
water/fat separation in the presence of large field inhomogeneities using a
graph cut algorithm, Magn Reson Med 2010;63:79-90.