Evaluation of Upper Airway Collapsibility Using Simultaneous Multi-Slice Real-Time MRI
Ziyue Wu1,2, Weiyi Chen1, Michael C.K. Khoo1, Sally L. Davidson Ward3, and Krishna S. Nayak1

1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Alltech Medical Systems, Solon, OH, United States, 3Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angels, CA, United States

Synopsis

We present a method for simultaneous multi-slice airway collapsibility measurement based on sparse golden-angle radial CAIPIRINHA, with acceleration factor up to 33.3. We present data from patients with obstructive sleep apnea and normal controls. One interesting finding is that a narrower airway site does not always correspond to higher collapsibility. This finding may be of interest to sleep surgeons. Our results also suggest that both compliance and Pclose were significantly different between healthy controls and OSA patients (P<0.001), and both measures can potentially serve as biomarkers.

Purpose

To develop and demonstrate a real-time imaging method with adequate spatiotemporal resolution and coverage for assessing upper airway collapsibility in sleep apnea.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive upper airway (UA) collapse during sleep. UA compliance, defined as the ratio of UA cross-sectional area and pressure, has been used to measure airway collapsibility1. Single-slice compliance measurement has been performed using real-time imaging2, however extended spatial coverage is essential in order to characterize collapse pattern. Here we present a method for simultaneous multi-slice compliance measurement based on sparse golden-angle radial CAIPIRINHA3.

Methods

Experiment Setup: experiments were performed on a clinical 3T scanner (EXCITE HDxt, GE) using a 6-channel carotid receive coil. Physiological signals including facemask pressure, abdomen bellow displacement, oxygen saturation and heart rate were simultaneously recorded to determine wakefulness/sleep. The mask was occasionally occluded to generate enough negative pressure for measuring compliance. Five adolescent OSA patients were studied and three of them fell asleep. Three adult OSA and four adult healthy volunteers were also studied during wakefulness.

Data acquisition: to image N slices, a total of N unique multi-band RF pulses were applied alternatively. The nth pulses was designed such that the phase difference between adjacent slices was $$$2\pi n/N, n\in [0,N-1]$$$. Continuous radial acquisition with 1/N golden-angle increment was used. Imaging parameters were: radial FLASH, 5˚ flip angle, 7mm/3mm slice thickness/spacing, 200 samples per readout, FOV 200x200mm2, TR 4ms.

Reconstruction: 24-32 spokes were used to reconstruct each temporal frame without view-sharing, which led to 96-128ms temporal resolution. Each slice was reconstructed separately by iteratively minimizing the cost function $$f_i=\sum_j ||ES_{ij}m_i-P_ik_j||_2^2+\lambda_i||\phi m_i||_1, i\in[1,N], j\in[1,N_c] $$ where i,j are the slice and coil index, Pi is the conjugate of RF phase cycling pattern, E is the inverse gridding operator, Sij is the coil sensitivity map, kj is the acquired k-space data, $$$\phi$$$ is the finite temporal difference, and mi is the image to be solved.

Postprocessing: the airway was segmented in each frame using a semi-automated region-growing algorithm2. The airway area was normalized by the maximum cross-sectional area among all slices during tidal breathing, in order to enable inter-subject comparison. For each slice, all data from one occluded breath were used to perform a linear regression (airway area vs pressure), from which the compliance (line slope) and projected closing pressure Pclose (horizontal zero-crossing) were calculated.

Data Analysis: All slices were grouped into the retropalatal and retroglossal regions. For the adolescent OSA patients, compliance and Pclose of the inhale and exhale portion of the first two breaths within one occlusion were calculated and compared during sleep and wakefulness respectively. Airway collapsibility was also compared across different subject categories.

Results & Discussion

Figs. 1 & 2 contain some representative results from one OSA patient during sleep. Fig.1 shows two frames, one with the airway open (top row) and the other with it partially collapsed (bottom row). The proposed reconstruction was able to recover all of the relevant UA boundary information. Minor residual streaking artifacts persisted but did not affect airway segmentation in our experience. This could be mitigated by sacrificing temporal resolution but a ~100ms resolution was purposely chosen to fully resolve the airway dynamics. Fig. 2a shows the cross-sectional area of each slice together with the mask pressure. Fig. 2b shows the linear regression lines for all four slices. One important finding is that a narrower airway site during tidal breathing does not necessarily have higher compliance or Pclose, and therefore is not always the most collapsible. Table 1 & 2 show that compliance and Pclose during sleep had smaller variance among the inhale/exhale portions of different breaths when compared to wakefulness. This is likely due to the involuntary muscle tone change, which suggests only the inhale portion of the first occluded breath should be used if only a wakefulness scan is performed. Table 3 shows the difference of compliance and Pclose values between OSA and healthy subjects was significant and both measures could potentially serve as biomarkers for diagnosing OSA.

Conclusion

we have demonstrated a novel imaging method for airway collapsibility measurement that combines acceleration techniques including SMS, parallel imaging, modified GA radial trajectory, and compressed sensing, to achieve 33.3x acceleration compared to fully sampled Cartesian scanning. To our best knowledge, we have experimentally discovered for the first time that a narrower airway site does not always correspond to higher collapsibility. This finding may be of interest to sleep surgeons. Our preliminary results suggest that both compliance and Pclose may serve as biomarkers to diagnose OSA, and can be calculated with a 20-second awake scan.

Acknowledgements

NIH R01-HL105210

References

[1] Kim et al., ISMRM 2012, p3688

[2] Wu et al., ISMRM 2014, p4323

[3] Yutzy et al., MRM 2011, 65(6):1630-37

Figures

Fig 1. Representative frames from one OSA patient. 4-slice SMS acquisition covering from soft palate to epiglottis (left to right) were used. Top row: one temporal frame when the airways were open. Second row: one frame when the airways were partially collapsed. There was a 42%-79% cross sectional area change due to the inspirational load. Note that residual streaking artifacts can be observed due to heavy undersampling. However, they have negligible impact on airway boundary depiction.

Fig 2. a) Cross-sectional area of the patent airway in each slice and the facemask pressure during one occluded breath. b) Linear regression of data from the inhale portion (shaded area in a), from which the compliance (slope) and Pclose (x-intercept) values were calculated. Colors correspond to the slice locations in Fig. 1. Note that while slice 4 is the narrowest at baseline, slice 1 is the most compliant and has the highest Pclose, suggesting that S1 is the more likely point of collapse.

Data from the first two consecutive breaths within one occlusion were used. Each breath was further divided into the inhale & exhale potion. Each listed mean±SD was calculated from the corresponding portion and breath only, from a total of 3 (subjects) x 2 (slices) x 3 (occlusions)=18 occlusions. All data were acquired from adolescent OSA group during sleep (two subjects who did not fall asleep were excluded). In each column, the p-values were calculated against the inhale portion of breath 1.

Each listed mean±SD of compliance and Pclose was calculated exactly the same as in Table 1, except from a total of 5 (subjects) x 2 (slices) x 6 (occlusions) = 60 occlusions. Two groups of three occlusions were induced at the first and last ten minutes of the one-hour study respectively, while the adolescent OSA patients were awake. For each column, the p-values were calculated against the inhale portion of breath 1. The unit is cmH2O-1 for compliance, and cmH2O for Pclose.

Each listed mean±SD was calculated from all available data during wakefulness, using the inhale portion of the first occluded breath only. There were 4/5/3 subjects in adult control, adolescent OSA, adult OSA group respectively. Each subject had 6 occlusions during wakefulness. The p-values in the first four columns were computed against the adult control group. The last two columns show the p-values when comparing the retropalatal region with the retroglossal region.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
0039