Zhe Liu1, Youngwook Kee2, Dong Zhou2, Pascal Spincemaille2, and Yi Wang1,2
1Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
We propose a Preconditioned QSM calculating susceptibility over the
entire field of view (FOV), which eliminates the errors associated with
background field removal. The background is regarded as part of the region with large
susceptibilities, which is determined by a preconditioned conjugate
gradient solver with enhanced convergence. Our data demonstrate that our preconditioned QSM provides a susceptibility map of the entire head accurately
depicting skin, bone, air filled sinuses and hemorrhages.Purpose
Currently, QSM methods suffer from errors in the regularization
assumptions and tissue boundary erosion
[1] used for background field removal
and from errors of shadow artifact caused by slow convergence to large local
susceptibilities, such as brain hemorrhage
[2]. Here we propose a novel
approach to address these problems by incorporating background as a region of
large susceptibility and by introducing preconditioning to accelerate
convergence. Accordingly, the QSM over the entire field of view with a large
range of susceptibilities is determined directly from the total field estimated
from MRI data.
Methods
The proposed total field inversion problem is:
$$\chi^*=arg\min_{\chi}\frac{1}{2}\parallel w\left(Mf-M(d\star\chi)\right) \parallel_2^2 + \lambda \parallel M_G \triangledown\chi\parallel_1(1)$$
with $$$\chi$$$ the susceptibility map (both inside and outside the region of
interest-ROI), $$$\star$$$ the convolution with the dipole kernel $$$d$$$, $$$M$$$ the mask for ROI, $$$f$$$ the total field estimated from multi-echo GRE images, $$$w$$$ the noise weighting, $$$\triangledown$$$ the gradient operator and $$$M_G$$$ the binary edge mask derived from magnitude image [3]. This is the combination of projection onto dipole field (PDF) [4] which
is a background field removal method, and MEDI [3] which is for dipole
inversion. The problem (1) is solved using Gauss Newton Conjugate Gradient [3]. In
order to improve its convergence, we introduce preconditioner $$$P$$$ for (1):
$$y^*=arg\min_{y}\frac{1}{2}\parallel w\left(Mf-Md\star(P\cdot y)\right) \parallel_2^2 + \lambda \parallel M_G \triangledown(P\cdot y)\parallel_1(2)$$
and susceptibility is recovered with element-wise multiplication $$$\chi^*=P\cdot y^*$$$. $$$P$$$ is constructed as:
$$P_i=\begin{cases}1 & (i\in M\ \ and\ \ i\notin M_{HL}) \\30 & (i\in M_{HL}\ \ or\ \ i\notin M)\end{cases}(3)$$
The mask $$$M_{HL}$$$ is chosen by thresholding $$$R2^*$$$ map $$$(M_{HL}:=R2^*>50s^{-1})$$$, carving out large susceptibility regions (such
as hemorrhage). The weight is constructed to reflect the
difference in magnitude of susceptibility between regions, and values (30 and
1) are empirically chosen to improve convergence for brain QSM.
We applied the proposed method on a numerical brain phantom. True susceptibility $$$\chi_T$$$ was set to 9ppm outside ROI $$$M$$$, and 0 inside except for a single point source 0.1 ppm (Fig. 1). Both current QSM (PDF+MEDI) and unpreconditioned total field
inversion (1) were applied on the total field $$$f$$$ generated by $$$\chi_T$$$, and the estimated susceptibility for the single point was compared with
truth (0.1 ppm). This experiment was repeated with different point
source locations, generating an error map indicating susceptibility accuracy for each
method. We also performed total field inversion on human brains of 5 healthy
subjects and 19 patients with brain hemorrhage. The in vivo data were scanned at 3T (16.0 GE, Waukesha, WI) with FA=15, FOV=24cm, 1$$$\times$$$1$$$\times$$$1 mm3 and echo spaceing 3.5 ms. For healthy subjects, both (1) and (2) were applied to show the effect
of preconditioning. For all in vivo
experiments, our current QSM routine, PDF+MEDI, was performed for
comparison. Additionally, we applied the preconditioning scheme (3) without skull stripping, thereby generating whole head QSM.
Results
In the numerical phantom simulations (Fig. 1), the proposed total field
inversion produced less errors in susceptibility estimation than current method. For healthy subject (Fig. 2), preconditioning (2) accelerated
convergence, reducing the required number of CG iterations in order to converge
to reference QSM map (MEDI result) from 300 to 50. In hemorrhage patients (Fig. 3), preconditioned total field inversion (2) suppressed the large hemorrhagic shadow artifact appearing on PDF+MEDI. Fig. 4 showed that our preconditioned method (2) generated susceptibility maps for skull, air-filled sinuses, subcutaneous fat and skin in the
head, as well as brain QSM comparable with MEDI.
Discussion
The proposed preconditioned method (2) reduced susceptibility inaccuracy/indeterminacy along tissue boundaries in standard QSM methods
[1] by directly
fitting the total field without partitioning the FOV into background and tissue. The preconditioner $$$P$$$ is consistent with the disparity between different tissue susceptibility levels and accelerated the CG convergence
to a QSM solution free of shadow artifact in brain hemorrhage patients. Moreover, since
the total field preserves the field generated by tissue outside the brain, we
are able to render bone, air and all soft tissues in the head, including brain parenchyma using total field inversion.
Conclusion
Our proposed preconditioned QSM method (2) handles
background and local susceptibility in a single total field inversion, eliminating errors associated
with background field removal and slow inversion convergence. This preconditioned
QSM method (2) enables high quality susceptibility maps for challenging cases, e.g. intracerebral hemorrhage, and for the whole head rendering including skin, skull and air-filled sinuses.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from NIH grants RO1 EB013443 and RO1 NS090464References
[1]. Wang, Yi, and Tian Liu. "Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine73.1 (2015): 82-101.
[2]. Li, Wei, et al. "A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping." NeuroImage 108 (2015): 111-122.
[3]. Liu, Tian, et al. "Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69.2 (2013): 467-476.
[4]. Liu, Tian, et al. "A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF)." NMR in Biomedicine 24.9 (2011): 1129-1136.