Hongjiang Wei1, Luke Xie2, Russell Dibb3, Wei Li4, Kyle Decker3, G. Allan Johnson3,5, and Chunlei Liu1,5
1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, 2Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 3Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, 4Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, United States, 5Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Synopsis
In this study, we demonstrate that whole brain cytoarchitecture
can be revealed by QSM at 10-μm resolution at 9.4T. Using QSM, we are able to
reveal exquisite anatomical details such as retina layers of the eyeball, glomeruli
in olfactory bulb, barrel cortex, medium-sized spiny neurons in striatum, cell
layers of cerebellum, and hippocampus. This ultra-high resolution QSM of the
intact mouse brain is a powerful dataset to allow analysis and visualization of
the brain cytoarchitecture in 3D.INTRODUCTION
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been
demonstrated to reveal excellent image contrast and can quantify the magnetic
properties of white matter that is not easily revealed by DTI (1, 2). At ultra-high magnetic field strengths, increase of
contrast-noise-ratio in susceptibility may allow the study of rodent neuroanatomy
at better details. In this study, we demonstrate that whole brain cytoarchitecture
can be revealed by QSM at 10-μm resolution at 9.4T. Using QSM, we are able to
reveal exquisite anatomical details such as retina layers of the eyeball, glomeruli
in olfactory bulb, barrel cortex, medium-sized spiny neurons in striatum, cell
layers of cerebellum, and hippocampus. This ultra-high resolution QSM of the
intact mouse brain is a powerful dataset to allow analysis and visualization of
the brain cytoarchitecture in 3D.
METHODS
The animal was prepared under an approved protocol
by the Duke Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. An adult male C57BL/6
mouse (Charles River Labs, Durham, NC) was perfusion fixed with Gd contrast
agent (ProHance; Bracco diagnostics, Princeton, NJ). The excised mouse brain
was imaged in a 9.4 T (400 MHz) 8.9-cm vertical bore Oxford magnet with
shielded gradients of 2200 mT/m. The specimen was scanned using a
three-dimensional (3D) spoiled-gradient-recalled sequence with multiecho
acquisition. The following MRI parameters were used: field of view (FOV) =
22×11×10 mm
3 with 10-µm isotropic resolution, TE1/TE2 = 6.8/16.4 ms, pulse
repetition time (TR) = 35 ms, flip angle = 90°. Total acquisition time for each
individual scan was 10 hours 42 minutes. Nine signal averages were acquired to
achieve adequate SNR. The raw phase was processed by Laplacian-based phase
unwrapping and V_SHARP background phase removal. QSM maps were reconstructed
using a two-level STAR-QSM algorithm (4) for reducing the streaking artifacts.
RESULTS
The QSM images revealed detailed anatomical
structures such as cell layers and individual glomeruli (Fig 1). Fig. 1A shows
a representative susceptibility map in the axial slice. The susceptibility demonstrates
a strong cell layer structure contrast and better delineation of anatomy. For
example, dramatic retina cell layer of the eye ball, glomeruli in olfactory
bulb (indicated by arrow), sinus structure, barrel cortex arrangement, small
fiber bundles of striatal neurons cell layers in cerebellum and hippocampus are
demonstrated by QSM maps (Fig. 1B-H). The glomeruli in olfactory bulb shows a
strong diamagnetic susceptibility than surrounding tissues. In addition, barrel
cortex barrel walls exhibit a paramagnetic susceptibility while barrel hollows
show a relative diamagnetic susceptibility. The V-shaped dentate gyrus regions
could be readily identified due to the strong contrast with respect to
surrounding tissues in hippocampus.
DISCUSSION
and CONCLUSION
A number of studies have demonstrated the
utility of DTI in understanding the global structure of the mouse brain and the
intricate connectivity. One of the challenges of DTI is the limited resolution
due to SNR constraints, e.g., 43-μm isotropic resolution is one of the highest
achieved resolution of a mouse brain specimen (5). The work shown here has increased the spatial resolution to 10-μm
isotropic by 3D multiecho GRE data. The susceptibility maps allow better
delineation of anatomy, e.g., the olfactory bulb layers, retina layers,
cortical layers, and cerebellum cell layers. Moreover, the high resolution
helps reduce the ambiguity in following fiber tracts. It is demonstrated the
utility of QSM in understanding small fiber bundles, e.g., in striatum, with several branches which
is known a limitation for DTI. Ultra-high resolution QSM provides quantitative
magnetic susceptibility in 3D that is virtually impossible to achieve by the
conventional MRI.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine. 2010;63(6):1471-7.2. Xie L, Dibb R, Cofer GP, Li W,
Nicholls PJ, Johnson GA, et al. Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and
its microstructural underpinnings. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2015;73(3):1270-81.3. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative
susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue
composition. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1645-56.4. Wei H, Dibb R, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Xu J,
Wang N, et al. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility
mapping of sources with large dynamic range. NMR in Biomedicine.
2015;28(10):1294-303.
5. Jiang Y, Johnson GA. Microscopic
diffusion tensor imaging of the mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2010;50(2):465-71.