Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier1, Jean-Marc Lina2, Russell Butler3, Kevin Whittingstall3, Pierre-Michel Bernier4, and Maxime Descoteaux1
1Computer Science department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 2École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 4Department of Kinanthropology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Synopsis
Diffusion MRI can recover white matter fibre bundles but it is blind to their directionality. We propose to identify the directionality of white matter fibre bundles by combining diffusion MRI and EEG data. Based on a realistic model of the brain and simulated EEG data, our preliminary results show that our proposed method is able to differentiate between afferent and efferent white matter connections.Purpose
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) allows the recovery of white matter fibre bundles which connect regions of the brain. However, directionality information cannot be retrieved, i.e. it is impossible to determine if fibres are efferent, afferent, or both
1. We propose a new method to combine electroencephalography (EEG) and dMRI to infer information flow in the white matter of the brain and thus gain insight into the directionality of white matter fibre bundles.
Methods
We suppose streamlines identified in dMRI act as wires which allow communication between connected regions of the brain. We further assume that information is transferred along the streamlines and that the delay between emission and reception of signals is proportional to the length of the streamlines. This implies that if two connected regions of the brain are activated with a delay that is consistent with their streamline length, information is likely to have flowed through this connection. EEG measurements, which are directly related to cortical activity, can thus be used to infer information flow. We propose a modified version of the maximum entropy on the mean (MEM) approach2 to detect this information flow. The MEM algorithm is driven by a Bayesian network where the intensity of a cortical source is influenced by the state of the region where it is located. To include the connectivity information provided by dMRI, a second layer was added to the initial network to regulate the state of a cluster based on its connections as illustrated in Figure 1. The output of this method is the probability that a connection is active for every time sample of EEG data. These probabilities can be mapped back to streamlines and animated to observe inferred information flow in the white matter. To test this new methodology, we acquired diffusion images of a healthy subject and used it to simulate EEG signals. These simulated signals, along with streamlines, are used as input to the modified MEM algorithm to estimate cortical source intensities and information flow in the white matter.
Diffusion images were acquired on a Phillips 3T using an EPI sequence with 60 gradient directions and a b-value of 1500 s/mm2. Fiber orientation distribution functions where computed constrained spherical deconvolution3 implemented in dipy4. Fiber tracking was performed using particle filter tracking5. An additional T1 weighted image was acquired to segment the surface of the cortex using freesurfer6. This surface was used to compute the EEG lead-field matrix using OpenMEEG7 where each vertex of the surface represents a cortical source.
Streamlines were clustered into bundles using Quickbundles8 with a distance parameter of 10 mm. A bundle was then selected and the sources nearest to the ends of each streamline were given an intensity of 1 with a delay $$$\Delta$$$. The delay $$$\Delta$$$ was computed using the average length of the streamlines in the bundle and the conduction velocity of axons estimated9 at 6 m/sec. Additional source clusters were randomly selected to simulate cortical activity not related to communication. To generate a second set of data, the same procedure was repeated but cortical sources at the end of the streamlines were activated before those at the start. Given the source intensities, the EEG signals on 64 electrodes were simulated using the forward model with additive noise (SNR 10). This noisy EEG signal and the clustered streamlines are the inputs given to the modified MEM algorithm.
Results
The selected fibre bundle is located in the corpus callosum and the streamlines connect sources in the right and left hemisphere. The middle row of Figure 2 illustrates the source intensities and information flow computed by the modified MEM algorithm for the first simulation. The algorithm correctly identified the fibre bundle that generated the simulated signal and the direction of the information flow. For the second simulation illustrated in the bottom row of Figure 2 the recovered flow is reversed because the activation first occurs in the left hemisphere and then in the right hemisphere.
Discussion and conclusion
Our preliminary results show that the fusion of diffusion MRI and EEG data can recover directionality of information flow in the white matter. More generally, our algorithm provides information flow through the white matter with a time resolution of a few milliseconds. This new methodology offers great potential in understanding the interaction between cortical regions. However, many challenges need to be addressed. For example, the conduction velocity of axons was selected as a parameter of the simulation and was assumed to be a known constant. In practice, many factors, such as axonal diameter and myelination, can affect this value.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. S. Jbabdi and H. Johansen-Berg. Tractography - where do we go from here? Brain Connectivity, 1(3):169–183, 2011.
2. C. Amblard, E. Lapalme, and J. M. Lina. Biomagnetic source detection by maximum entropy and graphical models. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 51(3):427–42, 2004.
3. J. D. Tournier, F. Calamante, and A. Connelly. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage, 35(4):1459–1472, 2007.
4. E. Garyfallidis, M. Brett, B. Amirbekian, A. Rokem, S. Van Der Walt, M. Descoteaux, and I. Nimmo-Smith. Dipy, a library for the analysis of diffusion MRI data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8(8), 2014.
5. G. Girard, K. Whittingstall, and M. Deriche, R. Descoteaux. Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases. NeuroImage, 98(1):266–278, 2014.
6. A. M. Dale, B. Fischl, and M.I. Sereno. Cortical surface-based analysis. i. segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage, 9:179–194, 1999.
7. A. Gramfort, T. Papadopoulo, E. Olivi, and M. Clerc. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomedical engineering online, 9:45, 2010.
8. E. Garyfallidis, M. M. Brett, M. Correia, G. B. Williams, and I. Nimmo-Smith. Quickbundles, a method for tractography simplification. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6(175), 2012.
9. M. Fukushima, O. Yamashita, T. R. Kosche, and M. Sato. MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks. NeuroImage, 105:408–427, 2015.