Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI uses chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) to retrieve information about microcirculation using D-glucose as a contrast agent.We performed glucoCEST imaging in four healthy volunteers at 3T and compared arterial input functions (AIFs) and DGE signal in white matter to measured venous blood glucose levels after glucose infusion. An increase in DGE signal following the glucose infusion was observed in cerebral arteries, but not in white matter. We observed a similarity in shape of the AIF and the blood glucose curve, and that a higher blood glucose level corresponds to a higher DGE signal.
Introduction
Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI can provide tumor enhancement and information about microvasculature using chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) with D-glucose as a biodegradable contrast agent 1, referred to as glucoCEST. The hydroxyl protons in glucose are saturated using a frequency-selective RF pulse and exchange subsequently with non-saturated water protons, leading to a lowering of the water signal where glucose is present. The CEST-effect benefits from higher field strengths 2, but DGE imaging has been performed also at 3T 3. Since reports are accumulating of adverse effects using gadolinium 4,5, safe clinical alternatives are desirable. We performed in-vivo glucoCEST imaging at 3T to investigate the clinical potential of DGE MRI by comparing dynamic DGE MRI curves in cerebral arteries and in white matter to venous blood glucose levels (BGL) measured by blood gas analysis. Since arterial concentration curves (i.e. arterial input functions, AIFs) are often required to extract different perfusion-related parameters it would be of interest to examine how the measured AIFs correspond to the sampled venous BGLs.Methods
Four consenting fasting volunteers were scanned on a 3T MAGNETOM Prisma (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a prototype CEST sequence with turbo spin echo readout. One axial slice with in-plane resolution 1.7x1.7 mm2 and slice thickness 5 mm was imaged with TR/TE = 6000/7.1 ms. Saturation was achieved using 10 Gaussian-shaped pulses (B1=1.6 $$$\mu$$$T) of 100 ms duration and 10 ms interpulse delay at a single saturation offset of 2 ppm from the water resonance frequency. Acquisition of 126 glucoCEST images was accomplished at a temporal resolution of 6 seconds and with a total scan time of less than 13 minutes, with intravenous administration of 50 ml of D-glucose in one arm after 3 minutes of imaging. The infusion duration was 90 seconds for three subjects and 80 seconds for one subject. Venous blood samples were collected in the contralateral arm before and after the glucose infusion and during the glucoCEST data acquisition, and the BGL was measured using a blood gas analyzer. The baseline BGL for each participant was subtracted from the measured BGL to obtain relative BGLs. Retrospective motion correction was performed using Elastix 6. DGE images were calculated from the signal difference between each glucoCEST image and the averaged pre-infusion images normalized to a non-saturated image (S0). A positive DGE-signal can therefore be interpreted as an increased glucose concentration in the voxel. Dynamic response curves were calculated in arteries and in white matter as the average of 4-8 voxels. DGE area-under-curve (AUC) images were calculated as the sum of DGE image signal values over two-minute intervals.Conclusion
AIFs can be measured in DGE images obtained at 3T, and a higher venous BGL did generally correspond to a higher DGE signal. Insignificant or negative response to glucose infusion was observed in white matter.1. Xu X, et al. Dynamic Glucose-Enhanced (DGE) MRI: Translation to Human Scanning and First Results in Glioma Patients. Tomography. 2015;1(2):105-114.
2. van Zijl PCM, Yadav NN. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): What is in a name and what isn’t? Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011;65:927-48.
3. Xu X, et al. Dynamic Glucose Enhanced Imaging at 3T: First Human Data. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, 2017, Honolulu, p.0193.
4. Thomsen HS, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and gadolinium-based contrast media: updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. European radiology. 2013;23(2):307-318.
5. Gulani V, et al. Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: Summary of Evidence and Recommendations. The Lancet Neurology. 2017;16(7):564-70.
6. Klein S, et al. Elastix: a toolbox for intensity based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(1):196–205.