Christoph Birkl1,2, Christian Langkammer2, Pascal Sati3, Christian Enzinger2, Franz Fazekas2, and Stefan Ropele2
1UBC MRI Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 3Translational Neuroradiology Unit, Neuroimmunology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
In this study we explored if quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)
allows assessing blood pressure induced changes of the magnetic susceptibility
in the brain as consequence of cerebral autoregulation. Eight healthy subjects underwent fast QSM at
3.0-T and simultaneous measurement of the mean arterial pressure (MAP)
following a small drop in MAP caused by a change in posture. A linear
relationship between MAP and susceptibility was observed, where the slope
represents a measure of the cerebral vascular compliance with different signs
for arterial and venous blood vessels.
Introduction
Cerebral
autoregulation (CA) 1 serves to maintain
a constant cerebral blood flow (CBF) over a wide range of mean arterial blood
pressure (MAP) levels (50 – 150 mmHg) to ensure adequate supply of the brain with
glucose and oxygen. This occurs by vasodilation or vasoconstriction of blood
vessels with concomitant changes of intravascular blood volume.2 Changes in cerebral
blood volume (CBV) per given change in blood pressure are viewed as indicator
of cerebral vascular compliance (CVC) which reflects a main component of
vascular function.3 The capability
for CVC varies across the cerebral vasculature depending on the amount of
smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall, the pericyte density, and most notably
on the length and diameter of the vessels.4 In this
regard, the most prominent CA induced blood volume changes can be expected to
occur in subcortical and pial vessels.4
The magnetic
susceptibility of blood is dominated by the oxygenation level of haemoglobin,
with a more paramagnetic susceptibility in venous vessels and a more
diamagnetic susceptibility in arterial vessels.5 In contrast,
the magnetic susceptibility of brain tissue is dominated by the diamagnetic
susceptibility of water, but paramagnetic and diamagnetic substances may cause
regional susceptibility variations.6
The goal of this study was to explore if QSM allows to
depict and map magnetic susceptibility changes in the brain as a consequence of
autoregulatory changes in CBV following a drop in blood pressure by lying down.7Methods
Eight healthy volunteers
(six men, two women) with a mean age of 32 years (age range 28-49 years) underwent
MR imaging on a 3.0-T MR system using a 64-channel head coil. For QSM, we
employed a 3D gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (greEPI) sequence 8 with TR = 50
ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle 15°, EPI factor = 15, and scan time of 57 sec. This
sequence was started immediately after the volunteers had taken their supine
position in the MR scanner. To monitor changes in QSM, this sequence was
repetitively performed eight times with subsequent reconstruction of QSM using the
total generalized variation method.9 At each start
of the greEPI sequence, the systolic (SYS) and diastolic (DIA) blood pressure and
the blood oxygenation level (SPO2) was measured and the MAP was calculated
according to MAP = DIA+1/3(SYS-DIA). Thereafter, a high-resolution T1
weighted true inversion recovery (TIR) sequence was performed for an anatomical
reference.
The magnetic
susceptibility of each greEPI measurement was correlated pixel by pixel with
the corresponding MAP using a linear regression model. The slope of the regression
line was taken as an indirect measure of the CVC.Results
In every
subject a gradual MAP drop was observed from lying down on the MRI table until close
to the end of the greEPI scans. The maximal decrease of MAP ranged between 7-14
mmHg (mean ∆Pmax = 10 ± 2 mmHg) across all subjects. The SPO2 ranged
between 96-100 % and was not affected by lying down.
Figure 1 shows
a representative compliance map with a semi-transparent cortical mask in correspondence
to the schematic drawing in Figure 2. Structures with blood pressure
dependent QSM changes are colour-coded with a positive slope displayed
in red (representing structures with mainly arterial
contributions) and a negative slope displayed in blue (representing structures
with mainly venous contributions). Most likely, these
structures reflect voxels containing predominantly long arterioles
and venules in the subcortical white matter and arterial and venous blood
vessels on the brain surface.10,11Discussion
Dynamic QSM imaging allows
to assess the functional component of the cerebral vasculature. We have demonstrated
that a small decrease in blood pressure, such as elicited by lying down, suffices
to induce magnetic susceptibility shifts in regions containing vessels with the
ability to change their diameter as a consequence of cerebral autoregulation.12 This property appears especially prominent in the
long arterioles and venules of the subcortical WM and on the cortical surface.
However, arterial and
venous vessels that occupy an imaging voxel to an equal proportion cannot be
depicted as their opposite
susceptibility shifts will cancel out. The signal from larger vessels with high
flow velocity can also not be captured due to outflow and saturation effects.
In conclusion, QSM allows a fast and non-invasive
mapping of blood pressure induced susceptibility changes, which could serve as
measure for CVC.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
-
Bayliss
WM. On the local reactions of the arterial wall to changes of internal
pressure. J Physiol. 1902;28(3):220-231.
doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1902.sp000911.
- Lassen
N. Cerebral Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Man. Physiol Rev.
1959;39(2):183-238.
- Aaslid
R, Newell DW, Stooss R, Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF. Assessment of cerebral
autoregulation dynamics from simultaneous arterial and venous transcranial
Doppler recordings in humans. Stroke. 1991;22(9):1148-1154. doi:10.1161/01.STR.22.9.1148.
- Kontos H, Wei
EP, Navari RM, Levasseur JE, Rosenblum WI, Patterson JL. Responses of cerebral arteries and
arterioles to acute hypotension and hypertension. Am J Physiol.
1978;234(4):H371-83. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1978.234.4.H371.
- Weisskoff
RM, Kiihne S. MRI susceptometry: Image-based measurement of absolute
susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood. Magn Reson Med.
1992;24(2):375-383. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910240219.
- Schenck
J. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI
magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys.
1996;23(6):815-850.
- Olufsen
MS. Blood pressure and blood flow variation during postural change from sitting
to standing: model development and validation. J Appl Physiol.
2005;99(4):1523-1537. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00177.2005.
- Sati
P, George IC, Shea CD, Gaitán MI, Reich DS. FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast
technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Radiology.
2012;265(3):926-932. doi:10.1148/radiol.12120208.
- Langkammer
C, Bredies K, Poser BA, et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using
3D EPI and total generalized variation. Neuroimage.
2015;111(2014):622-630. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.041.
- Duvernoy
HM, Delon S, Vannson JL. Cortical blood vessels of the human brain. Brain
Res Bull. 1981;7(5):519-579. doi:10.1016/0361-9230(81)90007-1.
- Moody
DM, Bell MA, Challa VR. Features of the cerebral vascular pattern that predict
vulnerability to perfusion or oxygenation deficiency: An anatomic study. Am
J Neuroradiol. 1990;11(3):431-439. doi:Thesis #26.
- Paulson OB, Strandgaard S, Edvinsson L.
Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 1990;2(2):161-192.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.15.3.413.