Xin Li1, Silvia Mangia2, Jing-Huei Lee3, Ruiliang Bai4, and Charles S. Springer1
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 2Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 4Interdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Synopsis
The homeostatic cellular water efflux rate
constant, kio, has a significant contribution from cell membrane
sodium pump activity previously unmeasurable. With high extracellular contrast agent concentration or ultra-low
magnetic field, kio can be precisely determined by two-site-exchange
analysis of in vivo 1H2O
longitudinal relaxation data. With the
low field case, there is an inversion of the apparent tissue compartmental contributions from the true
values. The NMR shutter-speed
organizing principle informs an analysis spanning the entire range of conditions.
Introduction
There
is growing evidence the pseudo-first order, homeostatic
cellular water efflux rate constant [kio] has a significant
contribution from the membrane Na+,K+-ATPase metabolic
rate [MRNKA].1 This
vital enzyme activity has not been accessible in vivo, and is thus a very powerful new biomarker. The rate constant kio can be precisely
measured with tissue 1H2O MR when the longitudinal
shutter-speed [к1] is sufficiently large, which occurs only when the
extracellular contrast agent (CA) concentration is very high1 or the magnetic
field strength (B0) very low.2 Methods
Longitudinal
tissue 1H2O relaxation data can be analyzed for
steady-state trans-cytolemmal water exchange kinetics using the
Bloch-McConnell-Woessner [BMW] two-site-exchange [2SX] equations.3,4 In these, it is important to appreciate the intra-
and extra-cellular 1H2O signal intrinsic relaxation rate constants [R1i and R1o,
respectively] differ from the apparent
values [R′1i and R′1o] determined in an experiment. The
same is true for the intrinsic compartmental
population fractions [pi and po] vs. the apparent, experimental values [p′i and p′o]: pi = 1 – po and p′i = 1 – p′o. The BMW equations relate the
apparent experimental parameters to their intrinsic counterparts.3,4 The equations include к1, defined1-4
as abs[R1i
– R1o]. We use this aspect to elucidate the entire
experimental range – from ultra-low B0
to high [CAo] concentration. We
stipulate a representative intrinsic parameter set {R1i, R1o,
pi, and kio} and then use the BMW equations to “reverse
engineer” expected experimental values. Results
Figure 1 shows the stipulated R1i (blue) and R1o (red)
values. As NMR properties, they depend
on B0 and [CAo]. Figure 1(left) varies log B0 (proportional to log
νL, the Larmor frequency) with [CAo] = 0. Figure 1(right) varies [CAo] with B0 = 1 T. The R1 values on the left are from
an in vivo tumor,2 and
those on the right are calculated with an experimental CA relaxivity, 3.8 mM-1s-1.4
If there was no exchange [kio = 0], these would be the
measured values. The к1
variation is also shown, as well as the point where к1 = 0, the
vanished-shutter-speed [VSS] condition. The
other intrinsic tissue properties, pi = 0.8 and kio = 1 s-1,
are also representative,1,2 and B0‑ and
[CAo]-invariant in this
isothermal plot. This is shown in Figure 2, where k = kio + koi
= kio[1 + (pi/po)], pi (blue), and
po (red) exhibit horizontal lines: the abscissa is the same as
Fig. 1. The exchange kinetics vary with only
temperature and/or metabolism. The plot
of k is reproduced in Figure 3,
along with the к1 trace. When
kio is finite, the BMW equations yield experimental R′1 and p′ behaviors very different from their intrinsic counterparts. Figure
4 shows the B0- and
[CAo]-dependences of R′1,fast (above) and R′1,slow (below), while Figure 5
shows p′fast and p′slow. The apparent population of the
faster relaxing intrinsic component (p′fast) must vanish in the VSS [the experimental relaxation goes from
non-mono-exponential to mono-exponential].5,6 Since this is R1i on the left and R1o
on the right, the compartmental assignments of R′1,fast and R′1,slow must switch between R′1i (blue) and R′1o (red), and p′fast and p′slow between p′i (blue) and p′o (red), upon VSS crossing.7
The only BMW term changing sign passing through VSS is the к1
argument (R1i – Rio),
and this has considerable consequence. Discussion
Figure
5 has important implications. A thin
horizontal dashed line at p′ = 0.1 represents the generous hope that a 10% minority component could
be detected. Even if so, there is a
considerable range – in fact spanning the entire current clinical enterprise -
in which experimental relaxation is effectively mono‑exponential, and precise kio
measurement is difficult.1 When
clinical instruments with B0
< ~ 0.1 T under construction are realized, one can expect to find non‑mono-exponential
relaxation. However, down to ~ 0.01 T
the experimental apparent minority component will correspond to
the actual majority component, p′i. At B0 ~ 0.01 T, there is apparent population equality [APE;
p′fast = p′slow],5 and thus between APE and VSS, there is an apparent
population inversion [API] regime. An empirical
bi‑exponential analysis of relaxation decay – as is often done – would yield a
complete compartment miss-assignment.
One must use the BMW equations to extract the true pi
and kio parameters that will be of great biomedical import. Acknowledgements
Grant Support: NIH:
R44 CA180425, Brenden-Colsen Center for Pancreatic Care. References
1. Springer, JMR,
291:110-126 (2018). 2. Ruggiero,
Baroni, Pezzana, Ferrante, Crich, Aime, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 57:7468-7472
(2018). 3. Landis, Li, Telang, Molina,
Palyka, Vetek, Springer, MRM, 42:467-478
(1999). 4. Li, Huang, Morris,
Tudorica, Seshan, Rooney, Tagge, Wang, Xu, Springer, PNAS 105:17937-17942 (2008). 5. Lee, Springer, MRM 49:450-458 (2003). 6. Zhang, Poirier-Quinot, Springer,
Balschi, Biophys. J. 101:2833-2842 (2011). 7. Zhang, Poirier-Quinot, Springer,
Balschi, JMR 205:28-37 (2010).