4910

Apparent Population Inversion Due to Steady-State Transcytolemmal Water Exchange
Xin Li1, Silvia Mangia2, Jing-Huei Lee3, Ruiliang Bai4, and Charles S. Springer1

1Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 2Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 4Interdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Synopsis

The homeostatic cellular water efflux rate constant, kio, has a significant contribution from cell membrane sodium pump activity previously unmeasurable. With high extracellular contrast agent concentration or ultra-low magnetic field, kio can be precisely determined by two-site-exchange analysis of in vivo 1H2O longitudinal relaxation data. With the low field case, there is an inversion of the apparent tissue compartmental contributions from the true values. The NMR shutter-speed organizing principle informs an analysis spanning the entire range of conditions.

Introduction

There is growing evidence the pseudo-first order, homeostatic cellular water efflux rate constant [kio] has a significant contribution from the membrane Na+,K+-ATPase metabolic rate [MRNKA].1 This vital enzyme activity has not been accessible in vivo, and is thus a very powerful new biomarker. The rate constant kio can be precisely measured with tissue 1H2O MR when the longitudinal shutter-speed [к1] is sufficiently large, which occurs only when the extracellular contrast agent (CA) concentration is very high1 or the magnetic field strength (B0) very low.2

Methods

Longitudinal tissue 1H2O relaxation data can be analyzed for steady-state trans-cytolemmal water exchange kinetics using the Bloch-McConnell-Woessner [BMW] two-site-exchange [2SX] equations.3,4 In these, it is important to appreciate the intra- and extra-cellular 1H2O signal intrinsic relaxation rate constants [R1i and R1o, respectively] differ from the apparent values [R′1i and R′1o] determined in an experiment. The same is true for the intrinsic compartmental population fractions [pi and po] vs. the apparent, experimental values [p′i and p′o]: pi = 1 – po and p′i = 1 – p′o. The BMW equations relate the apparent experimental parameters to their intrinsic counterparts.3,4 The equations include к1, defined1-4 as abs[R1i – R1o]. We use this aspect to elucidate the entire experimental range – from ultra-low B0 to high [CAo] concentration. We stipulate a representative intrinsic parameter set {R1i, R1o, pi, and kio} and then use the BMW equations to “reverse engineer” expected experimental values.

Results

Figure 1 shows the stipulated R1i (blue) and R1o (red) values. As NMR properties, they depend on B0 and [CAo]. Figure 1(left) varies log B0 (proportional to log νL, the Larmor frequency) with [CAo] = 0. Figure 1(right) varies [CAo] with B0 = 1 T. The R1 values on the left are from an in vivo tumor,2 and those on the right are calculated with an experimental CA relaxivity, 3.8 mM-1s-1.4 If there was no exchange [kio = 0], these would be the measured values. The к1 variation is also shown, as well as the point where к1 = 0, the vanished-shutter-speed [VSS] condition. The other intrinsic tissue properties, pi = 0.8 and kio = 1 s-1, are also representative,1,2 and B0‑ and [CAo]-invariant in this isothermal plot. This is shown in Figure 2, where k = kio + koi = kio[1 + (pi/po)], pi (blue), and po (red) exhibit horizontal lines: the abscissa is the same as Fig. 1. The exchange kinetics vary with only temperature and/or metabolism. The plot of k is reproduced in Figure 3, along with the к1 trace. When kio is finite, the BMW equations yield experimental R′1 and p′ behaviors very different from their intrinsic counterparts. Figure 4 shows the B0- and [CAo]-dependences of R′1,fast (above) and R′1,slow (below), while Figure 5 shows p′fast and p′slow. The apparent population of the faster relaxing intrinsic component (p′fast) must vanish in the VSS [the experimental relaxation goes from non-mono-exponential to mono-exponential].5,6 Since this is R1i on the left and R1o on the right, the compartmental assignments of R′1,fast and R′1,slow must switch between R′1i (blue) and R′1o (red), and p′fast and p′slow between p′i (blue) and p′o (red), upon VSS crossing.7 The only BMW term changing sign passing through VSS is the к1 argument (R1i – Rio), and this has considerable consequence.

Discussion

Figure 5 has important implications. A thin horizontal dashed line at p′ = 0.1 represents the generous hope that a 10% minority component could be detected. Even if so, there is a considerable range – in fact spanning the entire current clinical enterprise - in which experimental relaxation is effectively mono‑exponential, and precise kio measurement is difficult.1 When clinical instruments with B0 < ~ 0.1 T under construction are realized, one can expect to find non‑mono-exponential relaxation. However, down to ~ 0.01 T the experimental apparent minority component will correspond to the actual majority component, p′i. At B0 ~ 0.01 T, there is apparent population equality [APE; p′fast = p′slow],5 and thus between APE and VSS, there is an apparent population inversion [API] regime. An empirical bi‑exponential analysis of relaxation decay – as is often done – would yield a complete compartment miss-assignment. One must use the BMW equations to extract the true pi and kio parameters that will be of great biomedical import.

Acknowledgements

Grant Support: NIH: R44 CA180425, Brenden-Colsen Center for Pancreatic Care.

References

1. Springer, JMR, 291:110-126 (2018). 2. Ruggiero, Baroni, Pezzana, Ferrante, Crich, Aime, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 57:7468-7472 (2018). 3. Landis, Li, Telang, Molina, Palyka, Vetek, Springer, MRM, 42:467-478 (1999). 4. Li, Huang, Morris, Tudorica, Seshan, Rooney, Tagge, Wang, Xu, Springer, PNAS 105:17937-17942 (2008). 5. Lee, Springer, MRM 49:450-458 (2003). 6. Zhang, Poirier-Quinot, Springer, Balschi, Biophys. J. 101:2833-2842 (2011). 7. Zhang, Poirier-Quinot, Springer, Balschi, JMR 205:28-37 (2010).

Figures

Figure 1. The stipulated intrinsic intracellular (R1i, blue) and extracellular (R1o, red) longitudinal relaxation rate constants vs.: magnetic field, B0 [left], and extracellular CA concentration, [CAo] [right]. The left abscissa has a log B0 scale, with fixed [CAo] = 0. The right abscissa is linear in [CAo], with fixed B0 = 1.0 T. The left and right R1 values are from references 2 and 4, respectively. The longitudinal MR shutter‑speed, к1, and the vanished-shutter-speed [VSS] condition are indicated. It is important to note these would be the experimentally measured R1 values if no trans-cytolemmal water exchange [k = 0].

Figure 2. The non-dependences of the stipulated intrinsic compartmental mole fractions [“populations”], p, and inter‑compartmental exchange rate constant, k, on: [left] the magnetic field, B0, and [right] the extracellular CA concentration, [CAo]. The abscissa is the same as in Fig. 1. The intracellular (pi, blue) and extracellular (po, red) populations are measured on the left ordinate, while k is measured on the right ordinate.

Figure 3. The dependences of the stipulated MR shutter‑speed, к1, and inter‑compartmental exchange rate constant, k, on: [left] the magnetic field, B0, and [right] the extracellular CA concentration, [CAo]. The abscissa is the same as in Fig. 1, and the ordinate the same as on the right in Fig. 2. The vanished shutter-speed [VSS] condition is indicated. The rate constant kio can be determined with precision only when к1 >> k, the large shutter-speed regime [LSSR].

Figure 4. With the intrinsic parameters from Figs. 1 and 2, we calculated the dependences of apparent compartmental longitudinal relaxation rate constants, R′1 (R′1,fast and R′1,slow) on: [left] the magnetic field, B0, and [right] the extracellular CA concentration, [CAo]. The intracellular (R′1i) and extracellular (R′1o) rate constant segments are colored blue and red, respectively. The colors switch when the curves pass through the VSS condition. The abscissa is the same as in Fig. 1, and the ordinate the same as on the left in Fig. 1. Note the R1 crossing when k = 0 (Fig. 1) is avoided when k > 0.

Figure 5. With the Figs. 1 and 2 intrinsic parameters, we calculated the dependences of apparent compartmental populations, p′ (p′slow and p′fast) on: [left] the magnetic field, B0, and [right] the extracellular CA concentration, [CAo]. The intracellular (p′i) and extracellular (p′o) population segments are colored blue and red, respectively. The colors switch when the curves pass through the VSS condition. The apparent population equality [APE] point and apparent population inversion [API] regime are indicated, along with a conservatively small mono‑exponential relaxation regime. Unfortunately, current clinical MRI falls within this latter region: the system is constrained to the vast Fig. 3 shutter‑speed “wasteland.”

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
4910