Spiral trajectories provide efficient data acquisition and favorable motion properties for cardiac MRI. We developed multiband (MB) methods to accelerate spiral cardiac cine imaging including a non-iterative spiral slice-GRAPPA (SSG) reconstruction and a temporal SSG (TSSG). Using 25-35% of k-space for single-band calibration data, experiments in phantoms and five volunteers show 18.7% lower mean artifact power than CG-SENSE when imaging three slices simultaneously. TSSG incorporating CAIPIRINHA with temporal alternation and a temporal filter in reconstruction further reduced rRMSE by 11.2% compared to SSG.
The SSG method is illustrated in Figure 1, and the SSG reconstruction model can be expressed as follows:
xs=SSGsC(P∗s⋅X),
where the matrix SSGs is the spiral slice-GRAPPA kernel of the sth slice, C is the gridding function, P represents CAIPIRINHA phase modulation, X is the multiband k-space data, and xs is the separated k-space data of slice s. As shown in Fig. 1A, the SSGs kernel is fitted using the single-band (SB) spiral center of k-space as calibration data. For this calculation, CAIPIRINHA phase modulation is applied to all slices, then phase demodulation corresponding to the sth slice is applied to all slices. Next, gridding is performed on all slices, and the split-slice GRAPPA method2 is applied to fit the slice-GRAPPA kernel of the sth slice (Fig.1A). For image recovery, as shown in Figure 1B, the MB data are phase demodulated using the conjugate of the sth slice phase modulation matrix, P∗s, and the gridding function C is convolved with the MB data9. Next, the processed MB data are convolved with the sth slice-GRAPPA kernel, and the separated gridded k-space (xs) is obtained. Finally, the inverse Fast Fourier transform (IFFT) is performed to compute the image of the sth slice. This process is repeated for all slices. TSSG is based on alternation of CAIPIRINHA, and a temporal filter7, 8 is applied after SSG reconstruction.
Figure 2 shows that rRMSE is minimized when 25-35% of the SB k-space are used for kernel calibration. Example images reconstructed using 15% (a-c) and 35% (d-f) of k-space for calibration are shown, as are corresponding artifacts relative to fully-sampled SB reference images (g-l). Panels (p) and (q) show the dependence of rRMSE on the spatial and temporal resolution of the calibration data. Based on these results, subsequent MB acquisitions used 35% of k-space and one cardiac phase for the SB calibration data.
Figure 3 shows phantom results comparing SSG and CG-SENSE for MB=3, where both methods used 35% of SB k-space for calibration. Less slice leakage artifact was achieved using SSG. Results from a volunteer are shown in Figure 4. Specifically, for a reference, fully-sampled SB images at basal, mid-ventricular and apical locations are shown in Figure 4(g-i), and CG-SENSE-recovered MB images (a-c) and SSG-recovered MB images (d-f) at the same locations are also shown. Red arrows indicate slice-leakage artifacts in CG-SENSE, and these are reduced using SSG. The artifact power4 of SSG was 18.7% lower than CG-SENSE (0.148±0.036 vs 0.182±0.037 for SSG vs. CG-SENSE, p<0.05, N=5). SSG required 30% of the computation time of CG-SENSE. Figure 5 compares results using SSG (Fig.5 (a-c)) and TSSG (Fig.5 (d-f)). The mean rRMSE of TSSG was 11.2% lower than SSG. The computation time for TSSG is similar to SSG.