Ryan T. Oglesby1,2, Wilfred W. Lam2, and Greg J. Stanisz1,2
1Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Synopsis
An artifact has been observed in pure water
samples after increasing the temperature above 25 °C, regardless of the heating
mechanism. This study aims to determine the origins of the temperature-induced
artifact by using MR thermometry and T1 relaxation to investigate
samples containing increasing concentrations of agar. The addition of a small
concentration (0.1%) of agar eliminates the temperature artifact suggesting
that the increased viscosity of the samples decreases convection currents. Moreover,
this addition of a small concentration of agar study provides a practical means
of experimentally scanning samples at physiological temperature.
Introduction
When scanning MR phantoms, it is desirable to
recreate the conditions of human physiology. This investigation addresses the
issue of temperature stability in pure water phantoms. It has been observed
that scanning a pure water phantom after it has been heated above room
temperature will produce a consistent and reproducible artifact regardless of
the heating mechanism. Another crucial observation is that with the addition of
a small concentration (0.1%) of agar, the temperature-induced artifact
disappears. The goal of this phantom investigation is to determine the origin
of the artifact induced by increasing the temperature in a pure water sample.Methods
Six samples were prepared with concentrations
of agar ranging from 0–5 mM (molecular weight = 336.337 g/mol)1 at a
pH of 7.0 ± 0.3. Samples were scanned at 7T (BioSpec 70/30 USR, Bruker BioSpin,
Billerica, MA) using a temperature controlled phantom holder stabilized at 37.0
± 0.5 °C (Fig. 1). Single slice images were acquired using fast low angle shot
(FLASH; TR = 100 ms, TE = 4 ms, FOV = 25 × 25 mm, matrix = 128 × 128, and FA =
30°) to localize the
samples and demonstrate the artifact. A T1 map was calculated from
inversion recovery-prepared rapid acquisition with refocused echoes (RARE; TR =
10000 ms, TE = 6 ms, FOV = 25 × 25 mm, matrix = 64 × 64, and TI = 30, 100, 320,
1000, 3200, 10000 ms). Fitting was done
in MATLAB using a monoexponential model to calculate voxelwise T1 relaxation
time. Temperature change was calculated using multiple gradient echo (MGE; TR =
100 ms, TE = 2 ms, FOV = 25 × 25 mm, matrix = 128 × 128, FA = 30°, and echoes = 4). Using
the phase ($$$\phi$$$) images collected before ($$$T_0$$$ = 25 °C) and after ($$$T$$$ = 37
°C) heating the samples, the change in temperature ($$$\Delta T$$$) was calculated by
the following equation2:
$$ \Delta T = \frac{\phi(T_0) - \phi(T)}{\gamma\alpha B_0 TE} $$
where $$$\gamma$$$ is the gyromagnetic ratio of the
proton, $$$\alpha$$$ is the proton resonance frequency change coefficient ($$$\alpha$$$ = -0.01
ppm/°C for pure water3), and B0 is the magnetic field
strength. Calculations were done in MATLAB.
Results
The
FLASH images clearly illustrate the temperature induced artifact after heating
the samples to 37 °C (Fig. 2 – Left). Mapping the temperature
axially across the sample holder demonstrates a temperature gradient with the
warmest part of the sample located along the center line of the artifact (Fig.
2 – Right). It should also be noted that the solution temperature from MR
thermometry did not uniformly reach the desired 37 °C,
although direct measurement (via fiber optic temperature probe) indicated
otherwise. A
more precise demonstration was given by the T1 relaxation maps, in
which the artifact occurred in samples with up to 2–3 mM of agar, above which
the temperature-induced artifact disappeared (Fig. 3).Discussion
The
temperature gradient observed using MR thermometry in pure water and water with
the addition of agar (eliminating the temperature gradient) suggests that the
viscosity of the sample plays a role in the production of this
temperature-induced artifact. Circulating convection currents within the
samples are likely the origin of the temperature artifact. However, further
confirmation, possibly using diffusion-weighted imaging need to be run.Conclusion
The
current hypothesis is that the origin of these temperature-induced artifacts
are convection currents, which only occur in water with up to 2–3 mM of agar.
The small concentration (0.1%) of agar needed to eliminate the temperature
artifact does not greatly affect the other relevant MR parameters required for
phantom studies (e.g., those found in CEST signal models). Therefore, the
proposed method of heating with the addition of agar is a suitable experimental
design for metabolic phantom investigations.Acknowledgements
We thank the Canadian Institutes for Health
Research (PJT148660) for financial support.References
1. National Center for Biotechnology
Information. PubChem Compound Database; CID=71571511.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/71571511. Accessed Nov. 7, 2018.
2. Rieke V and Butts Pauly K. MR Thermometry.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(2):376-390.
3. Chung AH, Hynynen K, Colucci V, et al.
Optimization of spoiled gradient-echo phase imaging for in vivo localization of a focused ultrasound beam. Magn Reson Med.
1996;36(5):745-752.