4604

Pileup Artifact Correction Near Metal Implants Using Deep Neural Networks and Spectral K-Space Modulation
Kevin Koch1, Robin Karr1, and Andrew Nencka1

1Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States

Synopsis

Three-dimensional multispectral imaging (3D-MSI) techniques used for metal artifact correction can provide relatively clear images near most metallic implants. However, within localized regions near some implants, 3D-MSI demonstrate residual artifacts that are unlike any other artifact previously seen in MR images. These confounding features in 3D-MSI are known as “pileup” or “ring” artifacts. In this study, we present a novel approach to residual artifact correction in 3D-MSI that relies on 1) deep neural networks, 2) physical modeling of local gradients, and 3) k-space modulation and replacement of spectral data in compromised regions

Introduction

Three-dimensional multispectral imaging (3D-MSI) techniques used for metal artifact correction [1,2,3] can provide relatively clear images near most metallic implants. However, within localized regions near some implants, 3D-MSI demonstrate residual artifacts that are unlike any other artifact previously seen in MR images. These residual “pileup” or “ring” artifacts arise because 3D-MSI techniques can substantially reduce, but cannot fully eliminate spatial encoding errors and signal-reduction effects in MRI. Figure 1 provides a demonstration 3D-MSI pileup artifacts and illustrates their source as a function of local induction gradients near the implant interface.

Previous work has characterized the physics driving 3D-MSI pileup artifacts [4]. In this study, we present a novel approach to residual artifact correction in 3D-MSI that relies on 1) deep neural networks, 2) physical modeling of local gradients, and 3) k-space modulation and replacement of spectral data in compromised regions

Methods

Artifact Localization: A major challenge with previous attempts at residual artifact correction in 3D-MSI was the difficulty in focusing in on specific regions of artifact. Here, we utilize the power of deep learning to identify patterns of pileup artifact in 3D-MSI images. For this proof-of-principle study, 36 3D-MSI total hip replacement image sets were utilized to curate a training set. A 2D-UNET was utilized to train the network to identify regions of pileup artifact. The encoder-decoder (UNet) was created using PyTorch. Each encoder step consisted of two 3x3 2D convolution layers followed by a single 2x2 max pooling layer, while decoding was performed using a single 2x2 up-convolution followed by two 3x3 2D convolution layers. The final layer was a single 1x1 2D convolution which created a prediction (feature) map of the same size as the input images. The model had a depth of 4, meaning there were a total of 3 max pooling and up sampling steps.

For each epoch during training, the input data was divided into batches of 4. After each training pass, the loss was calculated using the binary cross entropy loss function and model parameters were updated. Once all training batches were complete, the updated model was applied to a separate validation set, and the loss was calculated using the same loss function. If the loss improved from the previous epoch, the latest model was saved. This training process was repeated for 200 epochs.

Artifact Repair: There are two classes of artifacts in extreme induced gradient regions: 1) signal pileup and 2) signal loss. Signal loss cannot be recovered using any post-processing approach. Pileup can be improved, but there are physical limitations to these improvements. In regions of pileup artifact, local induction gradients have effectively reduced the local frequency encoding gradient, and caused a spatial compression of signal. The resulting resolution loss is a Nyquist sampling issue, that cannot be repaired by re-gridding data. However, the manifestation of pileup artifacts can be reduced if k-space is modulated appropriately to account for the loss of sampling integrity. Our initial tests found that local gradient estimates, computed from 3D-MSI field maps [3], can provide insight on how much k-space compensation to apply in different regions. Using the regions identified with the deep-learning pattern-recognition algorithm, individual spectral bins were locally corrected using this approach. Figure 2 provides the workflow of this correction algorithms.

Results and Discussion

The training of the artifact detection network was sufficient to identify regions of severe pileup. Utilizing the training labels, a voxelwise analysis showed that the average detection score (probability of being in region of pileup) within each of the labeled ROIs was over 3 times that of the outside tissue regions (0.1467 inside vs 0.0582 outside). Empirically, the utility of the network was greatly improved if a high threshold was used to identify regions of pileup (0.7). As a result, some regions of modest pileup were missed. Further training with a larger curated dataset will be required to improve this performance.

Figures 3 and 4 provide demonstrations of the algorithm performance in regions of severe and modest pileup in two total hip replacements. In Figure 3, the severe artifact at the top of the acetabulum is removed, revealing a cleaner image with a loss of resolution (dictated by the physics which created the pileup artifact). The lower row provides an example within this dataset at the edge of the implant, where modest pileup rings are removed while maintaining reasonable resolution throughout the correction. The amount of blurring after correction is dictated by the local gradient field estimates, which is indicative of the Nyquist undersampling that was effectively performed during data acquisition.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a technology development grant from GE Healthcare.

References

1. Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly J, Hargreaves B. SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62:66–76.

2. Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS, King KF. A multispectral three- dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:381–390.

3. Koch KM, Brau AC, Chen W, Gold GE, Hargreaves BA, Koff M, McKinnon GC, Potter HG, King KF. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid. Magn Reson Med 2011;651:71–82. [

4 Koch, K. M., King, K. F., Carl, M., & Hargreaves, B. A. (2014). Imaging near metal: The impact of extreme static local field gradients on frequency encoding processes. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 71(6), 2024–2034. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.2486

Figures

Figure 1: Pileup or “ring” artifacts in 3D-MSI. The blue arrow points to a region of severe artifacts near a total hip resurfacing implant at 1.5T. The indicated line trace is plotted for both image magnitude (dashed blue line) and implant-induced field gradient in the frequency-encode dimension (top/down). The region of pileup artifact is circled, which occurs when the induced gradient is between 40 and 20% in magnitude and opposite in direction than the applied frequency encoding gradient.

Figure 2: 3D-MSI spectral bins are used to compute 3D-MSI field maps [3], which are then used to produce finite difference gradient maps. A conventional 3D-MSI composite image with ring artifacts is also constructed from the spectral bins, which is then fed into the deep-learning network to identify regions of pileup artifact. The repaired signal is extracted from spectral bins modulated at different levels of k-space encoding degradation. In this study, 3 correction levels were utilized: 10%, 20% and >30% of the frequency encode gradient amplitude. Note that the majority of the steps in the algorithm utilize physics-based processing.

Figure 3: Demonstration of 3D-MSI pileup correction. A central coronal slice is shown, which exhibits ring artifacts above the acetabular component. Using the presented methods, which utilize the DL-based ROI identification and local gradient estimates, this artifact is removed. An edge slice is shown in the second row, which also shows substantial artifacts removed, with compromised resolution in the correction area. The arrow shows a false-positive from the DL-detection, but does not show any effect in the corrected image, because the local gradient estimate in this area was so low and the applied correction was modest.

Figure 4: Top row demonstrates correction of a severe pileup artifact above the acetabular component of a total resurfacing implant at 1.5T. The ring artifacts are removed, but reveal noticeable resolution loss beneath the artifact, which is a necessary consequence of the correction process. The second row demonstrates a more modest ring artifact (arrow), which required less k-space correction and largely maintains the resolution of the image after the artifact is removed.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)
4604