The default MRI scanner systems are not equipped with key technical resources for rapid deployment of novel non-Cartesian pulse sequence approaches. Here, we describe a Graphical Programming Interface-based (GPI) platform that is further embedded into the vendor reconstruction environment. This allows for comprehensive development and validation of new trajectories by integrating on-line MRI systems development with off-line resources such as MATLAB, which also enhances trainee-driven research efforts. This tool offers a set of resources including real-time display of MRI k-space and prototyping/characterization of sampling trajectory corrections that may simplify and streamline these non-Cartesian designs.
MRI-Embedded Tool Description: Figure 1 shows the extension of the tool that is integrated between the vendor-provided reconstruction engine (Philips Recon 2.0), GPI [2,3], and MATLAB. This integrated tool allows for real-time interrogation of non-Cartesian MRI k-space that may require elaborate correction beyond capabilities of standard off-line (i.e. numerical) simulation.
Proposed Sequence Design Description: A non-Cartesian Rosette trajectory based on a previously provided description by Menon et al. [5] is further described here for development, testing, and validation using this tool. Specifically, the proposed development was: a) provided across different MRI vendors ([5] was completed on Siemens hardware), and b) performed by two technical trainee personnel (one PhD postdoc, and one graduate student) each with no more than three months of non-Cartesian MRI technical development experiences, respectively.
Modular Experiment Descriptions: Three modular experiments were performed using the above tools. First, the extent of gradient imperfection correction [6] step and rotation angle optimization [7] were jointly examined directly on the scanner for the multi-arm Rosette sampling scheme, with the goal of ensuring uniform k-space coverage despite variable acquisition and interleaving conditions. Second, application of sub-lattice shifts in the k-space domain [8] was examined to address Gibbs Ringing. Finally, an in-vivo study was performed to characterize the extent of corrections applied in the first two experiments in phantoms. The embedded tool was deployed on a research 3.0T Philips system; healthy subject heart data was obtained from one highly cooperative volunteer over a prolonged breath-hold. This data was post-processed through the GPI-MATLAB pipeline that yielded additional trajectory information from the scanner hardware.
Sampling Trajectory Validation by Simple Visual Inspection: Figure 2 shows an example of our MRI scanner output that display the actual sampling trajectory using a modified online Recon pipeline. This on-the-scanner visualization allows for immediate inspection of the prescribed sampling trajectory directly on the online reconstruction hardware, and eliminates the need for potentially cumbersome off-line post-processing. This non-Cartesian trajectory visualization simplifies the process of pulse sequence parameter optimization that is known to be sensitive to: angulation such as double-oblique prescription, number of interleaves, and other Rosette trajectory design parameters. Also embedded in the platform are utilities that allow for simulation using a numerical phantom for controlled assessment of the obtained trajectory.
Trajectory and Gibbs Ringing Correction Using a Phantom: Figure 3 demonstrates the MRI-embedded approach associated with trajectory correction. In red, the MRI-computed trajectory (i.e. the look-up table method) that does not account for hardware imperfections and potential distortions in the actual sampling trajectory, is shown. On the right, we show after applying Duyn’s correction [6] (in blue), which allows for both improved visualization of the target phantom whose signal inhomogeneity is less pronounced. Small subpixel shifts in the K-space using both magnitude and relative k-space position can further address Gibbs Ringing [7].
In-vivo Validation: Figure 4 further demonstrates the above corrections re-implemented in-vivo in a dedicated validation experiment. The obtained images clearly show notable differences in the in-vivo image reconstruction.
1. Santos et al. IEEE EMBS 2004 pp1048.
2. Zwart et al. MRM 74 (5) 1449-1460.
3. Podtar et al. Proc. ISMRM 2018 pp1136.
4. http://indexsmart.mirasmart.com/ISMRM2018/ search term: ‘rosette’. Accessed 2018
5. Menon et al. J. Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 34 (7), 1111-1116 (2014).
6. Duyn et al. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 132, 150-153 (1998).
7. Kawaji et al. PLoS One 2015. e0112020.
8. Kellner et al. MRM 76(5) 1574-1581.