Gehua Tong1, Sairam Geethanath2, and John Thomas Vaughan2
1Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 2MR Research Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Simultaneous Transmission
And Reception (STAR) has the potential to remove the constraint of temporal separation
between transmission and reception. In principle, much shorter acquisition
times with significantly higher signal strength compared to pulsed sequences should
be achievable. However, the signal characteristics differ from that of the
conventional pulsed-RF framework. In this work, we characterize STAR
characteristics with extended phase graph (EPG) simulation. We show the signal
evolution from a simple STAR experiment as well as how tissue contrast could be
generated in steady state.
Introduction
Simultaneous Transmission And Reception (STAR) has the potential to remove the constraint of temporal separation between transmission and reception as well as significantly reducing the power requirements. STAR in MRI was recently demonstrated using hardware that effectively isolates Tx and Rx1. In the simplest experiment, an oscillating magnetic field is continuously applied to the sample and reception can happen at all times during the experiment. Our goal is to quantify the temporal behavior of this signal in both transient and steady-state regimes with different acquisition and tissue parameters. To this end, the extended phase graph (EPG) is employed2,3 : we use a train of infinitesimally spaced hard RF pulses to approximate the continuous wave STAR experiment.Methods
EPG and STAR simulation
The EPG algorithm3 was
implemented in MATLAB and validated with HyperEcho (HE)4,
Turbo Spin Echo (TSE), and bSSFP5 sequences to ensure they exhibit
the expected behavior (Figure 1). A continuous RF wave along the x axis was
simulated in EPG by using an even train of hard pulses at interval ΔT (0.1ms) at a flip angle α, which produces a flip rate of A = γ*B1+=α/ΔT
(Figure 2). T2’ effects were assumed
negligible, and the signal was sampled after every RF pulse. We also derived an
expression for the STAR steady state using the Bloch equation.
BrainWeb
steady-state STAR image synthesis
The BrainWeb7,8
anatomical model was used to synthesize an axial slice using steady-state STAR
contrast at three different flip rates (1 deg/ms, 3 deg/ms, and 5 deg/ms) with
a direct mapping of steady-state values to voxels labelled by tissue type. The
steady-state values were obtained using BrainWeb’s standard T1 and T2
parameters.
Results
The simulated
STAR sequence echo train exhibits oscillatory behavior at the flip rate γ*B1+ combined with a decay over time (Figure 3). With
an early readout window and high sampling rate, the full
signal strength may be observed due to negligible T1 and T2 relaxation at this
time scale. The signal would appear as a sinusoid caused by nutation of M which
would happen in the y-z plane if B1+ is applied along x. This transient signal eventually decays
and settles on a lower steady state value dependent on T1, T2, and B1+, similar
to the behavior in bSSFP.
This
behavior was confirmed with an analysis using Bloch equations: for a single
tissue type and constant B1+ along the x axis, we have dMy/dt = γ(B1+)*(Mz)-My/T2,
dMz/dt = -γ*(B1)*(My)-(Mz-M0)/T1.
A stable fixed point always occurs at (u*,v*) = ((T2*A)/(1+T1*T2*A2), 1/(1+T1*T2*A2)
where u = My/M0, v = Mz/M0, and A = γ*B1, and the system is critically damped when
the flip rate
A = 0.5*(1/T2 -1/T1). At higher flip rates, the system is strongly pushed
by RF transmission and spirals down to equilibrium due to T1 and T2 damping,
while at lower flip rates, T1 and T2 effects dominate and the system decays to
equilibrium without oscillation (Figure 3). The equilibrium value is a function
of T1, T2 and B1 and can generate a standing contrast after the sample reaches steady
state. It also matches the steady state echo strength generated by EPG
simulation (red lines in Figure 3) and validates the discrete approach. Therefore,
we can approximate the same STAR behavior with different intervals in EPG as
long as the flip rate, or angular nutation frequency (α/ΔT)
is kept constant. The steady-state contrast is further explored in Figures 4
and 5, where the flip rate dependent contrast is shown and simulated on the
BrainWeb model.Discussion and Conclusion
With constant B1+, an
early readout provides a proton density contrast, while a T2 based contrast is
seen later during steady state. For example, at γ*Β1+ = 1 degree/ms, the steady state
occurs around t = 1 s. However, the main advantage of STAR is its near-zero
readout delay. Thus, future work will focus on the design of a variable B1+ envelope
for optimizing signal strength and/or contrast acquired in transient and steady
states.
Practical
constraints to STAR acquisition include SAR limits and ADC bandwidth, which
both restrict the maximum flip rate. Contrast also depends on a flip rate
low enough to allow relaxation effects distinguish different tissues. These constraints
need to be incorporated into STAR sequence design.
In conclusion,
we simulated and analyzed the signal behavior of a simple STAR experiment with constant-amplitude
B1+ input. T1 and T2 contrast can be generated in steady state, although a
variable flip rate scheme may be necessary for fast imaging with good contrast.
For reproducibility of this research, we have shared the source code online9. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sohn SM, Vaughan JT, Lagore RL, Garwood M, Idiyatullin D. In vivo MR imaging with simultaneous RF transmission and reception. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2016 Dec;76(6):1932-1938.
2. Jaynes ET. Matrix treatment of nuclear induction. Physical Review. 1955 May 15;98(4):1099.
3. Weigel M. Extended phase graphs: dephasing, RF pulses, and echoesâpure and simple. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):266-295.
4. Hennig J, Scheffler K. Hyperechoes. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2001 Jul;46(1):6-12.
5. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. European radiology. 2003 Nov 1;13(11):2409-2418.
6. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier; 2004 Sep 21; 592-593.
7. Cocosco CA, Kollokian V, Kwan RK, Pike GB, Evans AC. Brainweb: Online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database. InNeuroImage 1997.
8. Collins DL, Zijdenbos AP, Kollokian V, Sled JG, Kabani NJ, Holmes CJ, Evans AC. Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 1998 Jun;17(3):463-8.
9. EPG source code: https://github.com/tonggehua/EPG-simulation