Demarcation for brain tumour neurosurgical resection is typically performed using Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery images hyperintensities. In this study, we investigated in glioma patients whether these hyperintensities represent structural alterations that are metabolically and functionally homogeneous using simultaneous measurements of quantitative 18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose PET and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. FLAIR hyperintense regions resulted to be heterogeneous both at metabolic and functional standpoint and only partially significantly altered when compared with contralateral homologous white matter. These results support the hypothesis that multi-parametric approaches might improve the outcome of brain surgery informing the resection procedure.
Twelve subjects (7 males, age 59±19y) with newly diagnosed glioma (8 high grade; 4 low grade)3 were scanned before surgery with a Siemens Biograph mMR PET-MR scanner. [18F]FDG were dynamically recorded for 60 minutes while acquiring MRI sequences used both to define the tumour morphology (3D-T2w, 3D-FLAIR, 3D-T1w-MPRAGE before and after contrast administration) and to assess the brain functional connectivity (rs-fMRI, 15 minutes, MBfactor 2, TR/TE 1260/30ms, voxel size 3x3x3mm3). Dynamic PET data were quantified using the standard 2-tissue 3-parameter compartmental model4 to separate the delivery of [18F]FDG from plasma to tissue (K1 [ml/cm3/min]) and intracellular phosphorylation (k3 [1/min]). From a physiological perspective, K1 represents the net influx transport from the plasma mediated by the blood brain barrier (BBB). As BBB is highly permeable to glucose, it could be employed as a proxy of brain tissue perfusion. Rs-fMRI data underwent a state-of-art pre-processing; voxel-wise maps of local and global connectivity were then obtained by means of respectively Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) and global functional connectivity (gFC) indexes. ReHo is a measure of the similarity or synchronization between the time activity of a given voxel and its nearest neighbours5, whereas gFC is a voxel-wise measure that is computed as the average of the zero-lag cross-correlation between the time activity of the given voxel and each of the other brain voxels. The 3D-FLAIR hyperintensities were manually segmented and mapped into the contralateral hemisphere using a nonlinear approach. The white matter of the contralateral region was automatically extracted and used as reference to calculate voxel-wise laterality index (LI) for each quantitative parameter.
$$LI = \frac{tumour - contralateral}{tumour + contralateral}$$
In order to identify voxels with a statistically significant positive or negative LI (SLI), a bootstrap approach was employed6.The percentage of positive or negative LI over the total number of voxels within the FLAIR segmentation was calculated (SLI%) to summarize regional heterogeneity. In addition, for each patient a voxel-wise correlation analysis was performed on LI to investigate the relationship between metabolic abnormalities and the local/global functional changes.
1. Ghinda, D. C., Wu, J. S., Duncan, N. W., et al. How much is enough—Can resting state fMRI provide a demarcation for neurosurgical resection in glioma? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2018;84:245-261.
2. Kreth F., Thon N., Simon M., et al. Gross total but not incomplete resection of glioblastoma prolongs survival in the era of radiochemotherapy, Annals of Oncology, 2018;24(12):3117-3123.
3. Louis D.N., Perry A. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta neuropathologica 2016;131(6):803-820.
4. Phelps ME, Huang S-C, et al.. Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with [F-18]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: validation of method. Ann Neurol. 1979;6:371-388.
5. Zang, Y., Jiang, T., et al. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 2004;22:394-400.
6. Wilke M. and Schmithorst V.J. A combined bootstrap/histogram analysis approach for computing a lateralization index from neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 2006;33(2):522-530.