Jae Mo Park1,2,3, Ralph S Hashoian4, Galen D Reed5, Albert P Chen6, and Craig R Malloy1,7
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States, 4Clinical MR Solutions, Brookfield, WI, United States, 5GE Healthcare, Dallas, TX, United States, 6GE Healthcare, Toronto, ON, Canada, 7Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
A flexible torso 13C
RF coil with quadrature transmit and 8-channel receive array that is designed
for imaging cardiac and hepatic metabolism in humans was evaluated. B1+
field homogeneity and SNR were measured using phantoms. The torso coil had
improved SNR and larger spatial coverage as compared to the conventional
clamshell/paddle array coils.
Background
Combination of a clamshell transmit coil and two
paddle-shaped receive array coils (GE Healthcare, 4 channel per paddle) has
been used for imaging heart[1], liver and brain[2], [3] with hyperpolarized 13C MR. Although the transmit
coil has a reasonably homogeneous excitation profile and the receive arrays provides
decent sensitivities, application of the coils are often limited by multiple
factors such as subject size and positioning, location of the target organs and
patient discomfort, which are primarily due to the rigid design of the coils,
fixed position of the clamshell coil, and limited receive depth of the paddle
arrays. To improve sensitivity for 13C detection in the thorax and
abdomen, a new torso coil (Clinical MR Solutions, LLC) has been developed to
have a flexible design with larger receive coils. In particular, the receive
arrays are divided to two separate pieces with different sizes (four 3”x7.2”
arrays for anterior position, four 6”x8.5” arrays for posterior position),
which has multiple possible configuration for optimal heart and/or liver
imaging (Fig.1). In this work, we
tested the torso coil performance with phantoms and a healthy volunteer.Methods
Two types of phantoms were used for coil tests: two
cylindrical bottles that contain non-labeled pure ethylene glycol (35M,
diameter = 13cm) and a non-labeled rectangular dimethyl silicon (GE Healthcare,
size = 33 x 23 x 16 cm3, Gd-doped)[4]. First, the coil performance
was tested with ethylene glycol phantoms at a clinical 3T MR scanner (GE
healthcare, 750w) using two-dimensional free induction decay chemical shift
imaging (FID CSI; flip angle = 90o, repetition time = 5s, matrix
size = 16x16, field of view = 48x48cm2), and was compared with the results from the clamshell/paddle
coils. In a separate test, B1+ profile was also measured
using the dimethyl silicon phantom and the 2D FID CSI sequence and a
double-angle method. Finally, the coil was tested with a healthy subject
without any injection of hyperpolarized solution. All the data were processed
using MATLAB. Magnitude images were reconstructed from integrated 13C
peaks with baseline subtraction.Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows four separate
elements of the 13C torso coil: a wearable flexible quadrature
birdcage transmit coil (vest design), 4-channel posterior receive arrays,
4-channel anterior receive arrays, and a gateway. Figure 2 summarizes the FID CSI data acquired from (A) the torso
coil and (B) the clamshell/paddle coils, showing both coil-combined images and
images from individual channels. From the coil combined images, significantly
higher signals were detected from the torso coil compared to the
clamshell/paddle coils but also higher noise levels were noted from the torso
coil. The peak SNRs (near the receive coils) were comparable between the coils
(1329 for torso and 1469 for paddles). However, the SNR at the center of each
phantom was significantly higher from the torso (1172) than the
clamshell/paddles (882). Note that the spectra of the torso coil data (Fig. 2A) are in different scale
(0-10x1011) from those of clamshell/paddle coils data (Fig. 2B, 0-8x1011). The B1+
field was estimated from the magnitude images of the dimethyl silicon phantom
acquired using FID CSI (90o vs.
45o), Figure 3. The
transmit gain was calibrated using a separate scan using a 6-M [1-13C]lactate
syringe (diameter = 1cm) positioned at the center of the torso coil. While the
B1+ was approximately correct at the center of the
phantom, elevated B1+ was observed near the edge of the
phantom. The torso coil was tested with a healthy subject (Fig. 4) as a final safety check out. No discomfort was reported by
the subject even with the relatively large body size (186 cm tall, 88 kg body
weight). A 6-M lactate phantom was positioned under the anterior receive arrays
for transmit gain calibration. With absence of hyperpolarized 13C signal,
subcutaneous lipids peaks were detected (coil-combined – Fig.4C, individual coils – Fig.4D).Conclusion
We
demonstrated that the new flexible torso 13C coil with quadrature
transmit and 8-channel phased receive has a number of advantages. First, SNR is increased and the coil offers wider
coverage than the conventional 13C clamshell transmit and 8-channel
paddle array coils. Second, this torso coil is more comfortable and less bulky
which will be advantageous for claustrophobic patients. Finally, it allows
convenient positioning of the subject anywhere on the magnet axis. Acknowledgements
Funding: National Institutes of Health of the United States
(P41 EB015908, S10 OD018468); The Mobility Foundation; The Texas Institute of
Brain Injury and Repair.References
[1]. C.
H. Cunningham, J. Y. Lau, A. P. Chen, B. J. Geraghty, W. J. Perks, I. Roifman,
G. A. Wright, and K. A. Connelly, “Hyperpolarized 13C metabolic MRI of the
human heart: initial experience.,” Circ. Res., vol. 119, no. 11, pp.
1177–1182, Sep. 2016.
[2]. I.
Park, P. E. Z. Larson, J. W. Gordon, L. Carvajal, H.-Y. Chen, R. Bok, M. Van
Criekinge, M. Ferrone, J. B. Slater, D. Xu, J. Kurhanewicz, D. B. Vigneron, S.
Chang, and S. J. Nelson, “Development of methods and feasibility of using
hyperpolarized carbon-13 imaging data for evaluating brain metabolism in
patient studies.,” Magn Reson Med, Jan. 2018.
[3]. V.
Z. Miloushev, K. L. Granlund, R. Boltyanskiy, S. K. Lyashchenko, L. M.
DeAngelis, I. K. Mellinghoff, C. W. Brennan, V. Tabar, T. J. Yang, A. I.
Holodny, R. E. Sosa, Y. W. Guo, A. P. Chen, J. Tropp, F. Robb, and K. R.
Keshari, “Metabolic Imaging of the Human Brain with Hyperpolarized 13C Pyruvate
Demonstrates 13C Lactate Production in Brain Tumor Patients.,” Cancer Res.,
p. canres.0221.2018, May 2018.
[4]. T.
Skloss, “Phantom fluids for high field MR imaging.,” Intl Soc Magn Reson Med, #1635, 2004.