Shan Dang1, Haifeng Duan1, Dong Han1, Nan Yu1, Qi Yang1, and Shaoyu Wang2
1Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xian Yang, China, 2MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Shang hai, China
Synopsis
In this study, magnetization transfer (MT) and
diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) techniques were used to differentiate the solid
pulmonary masses. It was found that magnetization transfer can be used to
distinguish benign and malignant pulmonary masses. Combining magnetization
transfer and diffusion-weighted imaging, the accuracy of differentiation can be
further improved.
Introduction
The accurate diagnosis of solid pulmonary masses can
reduce the use of invasive examinations and help clinicians to choose the
optimal treatment plan. Nowadays, it is still difficult to differentiate some
lung masses using multi-slice spiral CT. Many previous publications have
confirmed that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is feasible in differentiating
benign from malignant solid pulmonary masses. Both magnetization transfer (MT)
and DWI can provide physiological and functional information of the organ.
Meanwhile, MT imaging has been shown to be a valuable tool in detecting several
diseases by reflecting the increase of macromolecules in the tissue. However,
there have been relatively few studies of the MT on solid pulmonary masses. This
study aims to investigate the value of MT and DWI in differentiating benign and
malignant solid pulmonary masses. Methods
A total of 66 patients (18 females, 48 males;
age range, 29-89 years), including 25 benign and 41 malignant cases, were enrolled
in this study. HASTE (half fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin echo), radial
VIBE (free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo, radial
volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination), T2 BLADE, MT and DWI
sequences were performed on a 3T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The DWI and MT images were independently
evaluated by two radiologists. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and MT
ratio (MTR) were calculated in the workstation. Intra-class correlation
coefficient (ICC) was computed to investigate the consistency of the
measurements between the two physicians. Mann-Whitney U test was used to
compare the differences between the two groups; multivariate logistic
regression analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the functional
information. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of
MTR-only, ADC-only and the combination of MTR with ADC values for benign and
malignant solid pulmonary masses. Results
The distribution of MTR and ADC values were not
Gaussian (p=0.004, p<0.001), and the consistency of MTR and ADC values
measured by the two radiologists were 0.927 and 0.944 (p<0.05),
respectively. The difference of MTR and ADC values between the two groups was
statistically significant (p=0.002, p<0.001) (Table 1). The MTR threshold is
18.73%, and the ADC threshold is 1069×10-6 mm2/s. Area
under the curve (AUC) of combination of MTR and ADC was higher than that of
ADC-only or MTR-only (Table 2). Malignant mass showed lower ADC and higher MTR
values than benign mass. The analysis results of sensitivity, specificity and
AUC of MTR-only, ADC-only and the combination of ADC and MTR were shown in
Table 3.Disscusion
In this study, MT and DWI showed statistical significance
in differentiating benign from malignant solid pulmonary masses. Although the
MTR-only showed slightly lower performance than the ADC-only, while their
combination yields the best AUC results, and indicate that the combination of
two techniques could be a potential way to improve differentiation accuracy of
solid pulmonary mass.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
No reference found.