Steffen Goerke1, Yannick Soehngen1, Anagha Deshmane2, Moritz Zaiss2, Johannes Breitling1, Philip S Boyd1, Kai Herz2, Ferdinand Zimmermann1, Karel D Klika3, Mark E Ladd1, and Peter Bachert1
1Divsion of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Department of High-field Magnetic Resonance, Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 3Molecular Structure Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
In
this study, the established acquisition protocol for relaxation-compensated APT
and rNOE CEST-MRI at 7 T has been successfully transferred to a clinically
relevant magnetic field strength of 3 T. This opens up the door to clinical
trials with a large number of participants, thus enabling a comprehensive
assessment of the clinical relevance of relaxation-compensation in CEST-MRI. The
presented CEST sequence is currently part of the clinical routine acquisition
protocol for brain tumor patients at our institute.
Introduction
Relaxation-compensated
CEST-MRI (i.e. the AREX contrast1) has already been shown to provide
valuable information for brain tumor diagnosis at ultra-high magnetic field
strengths2,3. This study aims at transferring the established
acquisition protocol at 7 T2 to a clinically relevant magnetic field
strength of 3 T. Insights gained from analyses of a protein model solution at
multiple B0 were utilized to assess the spectral widths of the APT
and rNOE signals at 3 T where clear peaks are no longer resolved in the
Z-spectra (Fig. 1).Methods
In
vivo 3D-CEST-MRI (1.7×1.7×3 mm3, 12 slices) was performed on a 3 T
MR scanner (Siemens Prisma) using the snapshot-CEST4 approach. Image-readout
parameters were adapted from ref. 5 and found to be optimal for: 340 Hz/pix BW,
Grappa 2, 7° FA. Pre-saturation (tsat = 3.7 s) was achieved by a
train of Gaussian-shaped pulses (tp = 20 ms, 80% DC). Z-spectra were
sampled at 57 frequency offsets, corrected for B0-inhomogenities,
de-noised using a principal component analysis, and fitted pixel-wise with a
Lorentzian 4-pool model. Relaxation-compensated CEST contrasts1 were
calculated according to: MTRRex = 1/Z – 1/Zref and AREX =
MTRRex/T1. Contrasts were acquired for two different B1
= 0.6 & 0.9 µT, and corrected for B1-inhomogeneities
(reconstructed B1 = 0.7 µT). The overall acquisition time, including
the two CEST scans as well as B0-, B1-, and T1-mapping,
was approx. 20 min.
Examinations
were approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the
University of Heidelberg.
Results & Discussion
Investigation
of a protein model solution at different B0 revealed a substantial
increase in the spectral range of CEST signals at low B0 (Fig. 1).
The signal broadening is in line with common observations in MR spectroscopy.
This prior knowledge of the spectral range of CEST signals (±15 ppm at 3 T) was
utilized to correctly assess the magnitude of the APT and rNOE signals at 3 T even though
clear peaks are no longer resolved in the Z-spectra (Fig. 2a). The acquired MTRRex-maps
(Fig. 2b) of a healthy volunteer are in line with previous results at 7 T,
showing a hyperintense APT signal in gray matter and a hyperintense rNOE signal
in white matter. AREX-maps of the APT and rNOE signals are similar, but
interestingly show substantial differences in the putamen (Fig. 2b, white
arrows). Examination of a patient with glioblastoma (Fig. 3) demonstrates the applicability
of this acquisition protocol in a clinical setting. Interpretation of contrast
changes in the tumor region (Fig. 3, pink arrows) will be evaluated after
examination of a sufficiently large cohort of patients.Conclusion
The
presented acquisition protocol allows relaxation-compensated APT and rNOE
CEST-MRI at 3 T with a 3D coverage of the human brain. The transfer to a
clinically relevant magnetic field strength of 3 T is of particular interest
with respect to clinical trials with a large number of participants, and thus
to assess the clinical relevance of relaxation-compensation in CEST-MRI. A
pilot study with brain tumor patients is currently under investigation.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Zaiss M, Xu J, Goerke S, et al. Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for spillover-,
MT-, and T1-corrected steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI – application to pH-weighted
MRI of acute stroke. NMR Biomed 2014; 27(3):240-252.
2.
Zaiss M, Windschuh J, Paech D, et al. Relaxation-compensated CEST-MRI of the
human brain at 7 T: Unbiased insight into NOE and amide signal changes in human
glioblastoma. NeuroImage 2015; 112:180-188.
3.
Paech D, Windschuh J, Oberhollenzer J, et al. Assessing the predictability of
IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status in glioma patients using
relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI at 7.0 T. Neuro Oncol 2018; doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy073.
4.
Zaiss M, Ehses P, and Scheffler K. Snapshot-CEST: Optimizing
spiral-centric-reordered gradient echo acquisition for fast and robust 3D CEST
MRI at 9.4 T. NMR Biomed 2018; 31:e3879.
5. Deshmane A, Zaiss
M, Lindig T, et al. 3D GRE snapshot CEST MRI with low power saturation for
clinical studies at 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2018; doi:10.1002/mrm.27569.