P. Xiao1, X. Han1, J. Huang1, J. Li1, Raymond H.W. Lam1, and Kannie W.Y. Chan1
1City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Synopsis
Image-guided cell therapy plays an
important role in monitoring and adjusting the treatment regimen. We have
demonstrated that cell viability could be monitored by CEST pH-nanosensors in
alginate hydrogel microbeads. Here, we investigated the use of microfluidics to
generate liposome containing microbeads and examined their CEST properties
after loading with the iodine CT contrast agents Iohexol and Iopamiro. We have
successfully demonstrated that the microbead size has greatly reduced from
300-400 μm to 20 μm. Moreover, iodine agents loaded liposomal microbeads generated 4% CEST contrast at 4.2 ppm at 3T. These
findings demonstrate a robust platform for the fabrication of liposome
containing microbeads under CEST MR guidance.
Introduction
Cell
encapsulation using hydrogel has emerged as a promising treatment for many
diseases and disorders.
Microfluidics can fabricate highly monodispersed microbeads at a wide range from
several microns to hundreds of microns in diameter. It can be tailored to match all the major gelations and can be
designed to genearate a variety of microstructurs.[i],[ii]
We have demonstrated that the design of
microbeads could facilitate the monitoring of cell viability using CEST MRI. It
detects the decrease in CEST contrast when cell death occurred.[iii],[iv] In
this study, we aim to fabricate microbeads with smaller size and slow down the
release of contrast agents from liposomes[v]. We
developed a robust microfluidic platform for the fabrication of liposome-contained alginate
microbeads, which iodine CT contrast agents were loaded into the liposomes, and
studied their CEST contrast at 3T. The results showed that this robust
microfluidic platform generated microbeads at a few tens of microns, which
could faciliate the monitoring cell status after cell transplantation.Methods
Liposomes were
prepared by using thin film hydration method.[i]
In brief, EPC, cholesterol and DSPE-PEG2000 were mixed in a molar ratio of 65:32:3 in chloroform with total weight of lipids of 25mg. The
solvent was removed and the resulting thin film was hydrated with 1 mL Iohexol
solution or 1mL Iopamiro solution.The suspension was annealed and extruded. Liposome was mixed with 4wt% alginate solution
and 200mM Ca-EDTA solution at volume ratio of 2: 1: 1, as the water phase while
mineral oil with 2wt% span 80 was the oil phase. Microfluidic devices were
fabricated by soft lithography and replica modeling of PDMS.[ii] After microbead collection,
acetic acid was added to form hydrogel beads.[iii] Phantoms were imaged on
a horizontal bore 3T preclinical Bruker BioSpec system at 37 oC.
Image was acquired using RARE with the following saturation parameters: B1
were 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0uT and Tsat=3000ms; and imaging parameters:
Slice thickness=2 mm, RARE factor = 32, repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) =
6000/4.7 ms, -10 to + 10 ppm, 0.2 ppm steps. CEST
contrast was calculated by applying Lorentzian fitting on Z spectra (CESTcontrast%).
[i] Chan, K. W. et al. J Control Release 2014:180:51-59.
[ii] Y. Xia, et al, Angewandte Chemie International
Edition, 1998, 37, 550-575.
[iii] Choi CH, et al, Biomedical Microdevices.
2007;9:855-62.
Figure
1. CEST contrast
of Iohexol liposome (a) and Iopamiro
liposomes (b) and pH dependency of
Iopamiro liposome (c) at 3T.
Figure
2. Alginate
beads prepared with microfluidic device (scale bar=40μ m) (a) and size distribution of alginate beads prepared by oil and
water flow rate of 700μl/h and 150μl/h, respectively (b), and CEST
contrast of alginate hydrogel microbeads containing Iopamiro-liposome at pH 4.1
at 3T (c).
Results
The prepared Iohexol-liposomes
and Iopamiro-liposome showed CEST contrast of 44% and 49% at 4.2ppm and B1
= 1.0 μT, respectively.
Their particle size and polydispersity index were 146 nm, PDI=0.150 and 135nm,
PDI= 0.107 respectively.
The particle concentration was at (2.7±0.3)x1018 for
the CEST measurement before transferring them to incorporate into the alginate
microbeads by microfluidics. The alginate beads prepared by the designed
microfluidics device at oil flow rate of 700 μl/h and water flow rate of 150
μl/h had size of 17.4
μm with CV of 11.3%.
The LipoCEST microbeads containing Iopamiro-liposomes show CEST contrast of 4%
at 5.6ppm.Discussion
The liposome
containing alginate microbeads prepared by microfluidics had a much smaller
size (20μm) and monodisperse as compared to those
prepared by electrospray approach4. The prepared Iohexol-liposomes
and Iopamiro-liposome showed strong CEST contrast almost 50% contrast at
4.2ppm, which is favorable for the preparation of alginate microbeads. The liposomal
alginate beads containing the iodine CT CAs as prepared by our microfuildics
platform showed distinctive CEST contrast, which could be valuable for
monitoring status
after implantation. The further optimizations of the platform to generate
liposomal microbeads with higher CEST contrast are underway.Conclusion
We have developed a robust platform
to fabricate liposome-contained alginate microbeads with small size and narrow size
distribution. By incorporating the iodinate CT contrast agents, i.e. Iohexol
and Iopamiro, we showed that these liposomal microbeads generated unique CEST
contrast at 4.2 ppm. We believe this platform can facilitate MR guided cell
therapy, especially to improve the injectability and detectability of the CEST
microbeds. Acknowledgements
This study was supported
by CityU: P9610362; P7200516; P6000612;P7004859;
RGC: GRF-9042620; NSFC: 81871409-H1808.References
[1] Teh SY, et al. Lab on a Chip. 2008;8:198-220.
[2] Shintaku H, et al. Microsystem Technologies.
2006;13:951-8.
[3] P. C. Van Zijl, et al, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
2011, 65, 927-948.
[4] K. W. Chan, et al , Nature Materials, 2013, 12,
268-275.
[5] Kim J, et al. Angewandte Chemie. 2011;50:2317-21.
[6] Chan, K. W. et al. J Control Release 2014:180:51-59.
[7] Y. Xia, et al, Angewandte Chemie International
Edition, 1998, 37, 550-575.
[8] Choi CH, et al, Biomedical Microdevices.
2007;9:855-62.