An operant learning device for head-fixed mouse was developed for ultra-high field (15.2 Tesla) fMRI. Habituated mice were learned to water reward, associated with cue of light stimulation as a conditioning stimulus. We obtained 1,000 sets of BOLD fMRI (GE-EPI, TR/TE = 1000/11 ms), and found that elevated activation of a limbic learning network, including the entorhinal, perirhinal, and retrosprenial cortices and the hippocampal formation, during cue-reward association in learned mice.
1. Bussey, J. and Saksida, M. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus. 2007; 17(9), 898-908
2. Götz, J., et al. Rodent models for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018; 19, 583-598.
3. Han, S. H., Son J. P., Cho, H.J., Park, J.-Y., and Kim, S.-G. Gradient‐echo and spin‐echo blood oxygenation level–dependent functional MRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2018; DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27457.
4. Hikishima, K. et al. In vivo microscopic voxel-based morphometry with a brain template to characterize strain specific structures in the mouse brain. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7, 85.
5. Jomura, N., Shintani, T., Sakurai, K., Kaneko, J., and Hisatsune, T. Mouse BOLD fMRI imaging during operant learning at ultra-high field (14 T). Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2017; 25, 5365.
6. Jonckers, E., et al. Functional connectivity fMRI of the rodent brain: comparison of functional connectivity networks in rat and mouse. PLoS One. 2011; 6, e18876.
7. Logothetis, N. K. et al. A neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the BOLD signal in fMRI. Nature. 2001; 412(6843), 150-157.
8. Mogami, T. and Tanaka, K. Reward association affects neuronal responses to visual stimuli in macaque te and perirhinal cortices. J. Neurosci. 2006; 26(25), 6761-6770.
9. Squire, L. and Wixted, T. The cognitive neuroscience of human memory since H.M. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2011; 34, 259-288.
Fig 1. Habituated mouse situated in non-magnetic cue-reward operant learning device
By the use of habituated mouse with a plastic head-bar (0.2 g), we minimized the head movement of the mouse. In this learning device, we utilized light stimulus as a cue and water as a reward. We used an optic sensor that senses the licking action of murine tongue to detect a conditioned response.
Fig 2. Schedule of cue-reward operant association learning fMRI in mice
Operant learning task for fMRI consisted of 4 phases; head-post surgery, rest for recovery, licking training to take water from plastic nozzle in the dice chamber, and cue-reward association learning (Go task) in the MRI scanner (15.2 T BioSpec 152/11 MRI, Bruker). In the association learning task, mice were provided with water (4 µL) immediately after the licking behavior, sticking out their tongue, during cue (light) stimulus.
Fig 3. Definition of learning behaviors during cue-reward association task for fMRI
We differentiate learning behavior into four categories: Net correct, Continuous, Timing error, and Omission, in each trial (20 seconds). Mice were performed 50 trials continuously per day (One session).
Fig 4. A limbic network responsible for cue-reward association learning in mice
We compared fMRI data during 4.0 – 9.0 second (5 scans) after the initiation of each trial between net correct trials and no-reward trials (timing error and omission) from three mice tested. Upper panel shows all slices, and lower panel shows an enlarged limbic section. PFWE < 0.05, threshold k=20, scale bar represents T-scores.
Fig 5. Elevation of BOLD signal in the entorhinal cortex of association learning mice
We computed fMRI data sets from all reward trials (39/50 total trials) from mouse #2, in a spm 12 1st-level analysis. We plotted a time course of BOLD signal (percentage of increase) at the peak voxel in the right entorhinal cortex, immediately after the 2 seconds of light stimulation.