Synopsis
Perceived stress (PS), which reflects the tendency to appraise one’s
life situations as stressful and overwhelmed, is a stable predictor for
depression. Here, we used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging
to investigate the neural basis of PS and the underlying brain mechanism
linking PS and depression in 217 adolescents. We found that PS was positively
related to the spontaneous activity in the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Furthermore,
PS mediated the link between the left SFG activity and depression. Altogether,
our study might present a neurofunctional marker of PS and reveal an underlying
brain-stress mechanism for predicting depression.
Introduction
Identifying factors for the prediction of depression is a long-standing research
topic in psychiatry and psychology. Many previous studies have suggested that
perceived stress, which refers to the degree to which events in a person’s life
are assessed as stressful and uncontrollable 1, can predict
subsequent depressive symptoms in different populations 2-4. However,
the neurobiological bases of perceived stress and the underlying mechanisms for
how perceived stress influences depression in the brain remained largely
unknown. Here, we investigated these issues in 217 healthy adolescents by estimating
fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) via resting-state
functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI).Methods
A total of 217 healthy
adolescent students (110 women; mean age = 18.50 ± 0.55 years)
from several local public high schools participated in this study. We used the 10-item Perceived
Stress Scale (PSS) 1 to assess perceived
stress and used the Beck Depression Inventory 5 to evaluate individual’s depressive
symptoms. Additionally, to exclude the potential impact of anxiety on the
relationships among perceived stress, resting-state brain activity and
depression, we used the State Anxiety Inventory 6 to assess
participants’ anxious symptoms. The image data were collected using a 3.0 T Siemens-Trio
Erlangen MRI scanner. Each participant took part in an 8-minute RS-fMRI scan
including 240 echo-planar imaging volumes (repetition time/echo time = 2000/30
ms; flip angle = 90°; slices = 30; matrix = 64 × 64; thickness = 5 mm; field of
view = 24 × 24 cm2; voxel size = 3.75 × 3.75 × 5 mm3).
During the image acquisition, we asked each participant to close his/her eyes
and remain awake without thinking about anything purposely. The DPARSF toolbox
7 was employed to preprocess the RS-fMRI data, with the following steps:
discarding the first ten images, slice timing and head motion correction,
realignment, normalization with 3 × 3 × 3 mm3 resolution, smoothing
using an 8-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel, and removing linear trends. Next, the fALFF
of each participant was computed according to the procedure developed by Zou et
al. (2008) 8. To detect the
neurofunctional substrates of perceived stress, a whole-brain correlation
analysis was conducted between PSS scores and voxel-vise fALFF. The Gaussian
random field approach 9 was employed to determine the regions of
significance, with a threshold of p < 0.005
at voxel level and p < 0.05 at
cluster level. Then, we performed a prediction analysis 10 to test
the stability of the association between perceived stress and regional fALFF. Finally,
we conducted mediation analyses 11 to explore the association
between regional fALFF, perceived stress and depression.Results
The whole-brain correlation
analyses found that after adjusting for gender, age and head motion, perceived stress was positively
associated with the fALFF in the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG; MNI coordinates: -18, 51, 15; cluster size = 212
voxels; Z = 3.92; r = 0.30, p <
0.001; Figure 1). The prediction analyses revealed that perceived stress could be
stably predicted by the fALFF in the left SFG [r(predicted, observed)
= 0.27, p < 0.001], after
controlling for gender, age and head motion. Furthermore, mediation analyses
showed that perceived stress played a mediating role in the relation between
the fALFF in the left SFG and depression (indirect effect = 0.146, 95% CI =
[0.080, 0.248], p < 0.05; Figure 2),
after controlling for gender, age and head motion. Finally, these results
persisted even after excluding the impact of anxiety, suggesting the
specificity of our findings.Discussion
The current research was
conducted to investigate the functional brain basis of perceived stress and the
underlying brain mechanism linking perceived stress and depression. First, higher levels of
perceived stress were linked to greater fALFF in the left SFG, which is
consistent with previous findings showing an association between SFG function
and structure and stress-related processing 12-16. Additionally, the
positive association of the fALFF in the left SFG with perceived stress may
reflect a compensatory mechanism to counteract functional or structural brain abnormalities
17,18. Second, perceived stress served as a mediator in the link between
SFG spontaneous activity and depression. This finding may present further
evidence for the predictive role of perceived stress in depression and
highlight that perceived stress may be a potential mechanism linking spontaneous
brain activity with depression.Conclusion
In conclusion, this research
provides initial evidence for neurofunctional makers underlying perceived
stress and reveals a potential brain-stress mechanism for predicting depression.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgements.References
1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24:385-396.
2. Chao SF. Functional disability and depressive symptoms: Longitudinal effects of activity restriction, perceived stress, and social support. Aging Ment Health. 2014; 18:767-776.
3. Lorenzo-Blanco EI, Unger JB. Ethnic discrimination, acculturative stress, and family conflict as predictors of depressive symptoms and cigarette smoking among Latina/o youth: The mediating role of perceived stress. J Youth Adolescence. 2015; 44:1984-1997.
4. Tsai HJ, Chang FK. Associations of various perceived-stress situations with depressive symptoms in >= 50-year old Taiwanese men and women: Results from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging. Arch Gerontol Geriat. 2016; 67:113-119.
5. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4:561-571.
6. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. STAI-manual for the State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press, 1988.
7. Yan CG, Wang XD, Zuo XN, Zang YF. DPABI: Data processing & analysis for (resting-state) brain imaging. Neuroinformatics. 2016; 14:339-351.
8. Zou QH, Zhu CZ, Yang YH, Zuo XN, Long XY, Cao QJ, Wang YF, Zang YF . An improved approach to detection of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: Fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Meth. 2008; 172:137-141.
9. Worsley KJ, Evans AC, Marrett S, Neelin P. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 1992; 12:900-918.
10. Supekar K, Swigart AG, Tenison C, Jolles DD, Rosenberg-Lee M, Fuchs L, Menon V. Neural predictors of individual differences in response to math tutoring in primary-grade school children. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110:8230-8235.
11. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2013.
12. Treadway MT, Buckholtz JW, Zald DH. Perceived stress predicts altered reward and loss feedback processing in medial prefrontal cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:180.
13. Pruessner JC, Declovic K, Khalili-Mahani N, Engert V, Pruessner M, Buss C, Renwick R, Dagher A, Meaney MJ, Lupien S. Deactivation of the limbic system during acute psychosocial stress: Evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance Imaging studies. Biol Psychiat. 2008; 63:234-240.
14. Li GY, Ma XY, Bian HM, Sun XH, Zhai N, Yao MY, Qu HR, Ji SZ, Tian HJ, Zhuo CJ. A pilot fMRI study of the effect of stressful factors on the onset of depression in female patients. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016; 10:195-202.
15. Tyborowska A, Volman I, Niermann HCM, Pouwels JL, Smeekens S, Cillessen AHN, Toni I, Roelofs K. Early-life and pubertal stress differentially modulate grey matter development in human adolescents. Sci Rep-Uk. 2018; 8:9201.
16. Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R. Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insula regions. Biol Psychiat. 2012; 72:57-64.
17. Bing X, Ming-Guo Q, Ye Z, Jing-Na Z, Min L, Han C, Yu Z, Jia-Jia Z, Jian W, Wei C, Han-Jian D, Shao-Xiang Z. Alterations in the cortical thickness and the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Brain research. 2013; 1490:225-232.
18. Orr C, Morioka R, Behan B, Datwani S, Doucet M, Ivanovic J, Kelly C, Weierstall K, Watts R, Smyth B, Garavan H. Altered resting-state connectivity in adolescent cannabis users. Am J Drug Alcohol Ab. 2013; 39:372-381.