Masaaki Hori1, Akifumi Hagiwara1,2, Kazumasa Yokoyama3, Kouhei Kamiya2, Issei Fukunaga1, Tomoko Maekawa1,2, Koji Kamagata1, Katsutoshi Murata4, Shohei Fujita1,2, Ryusuke Irie1,2, Christina Andica1, Kanako Kunishima Kumamaru1, Akihiko Wada1, Julien Cohen-Adad5, and Shigeki Aoki1
1Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 2Radiology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 3Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 4Siemens Japan K.K, Tokyo, Japan, 5NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
Synopsis
We investigated
both branches (Da ≤ De,∥ or Da > De,∥) of Kurtosis-based
white matter tract integrity to distinguish microstructural changes in the
spinal cords of patients with MS and Neuromyelitis Optica. FA and AWF were
significant higher and MD was significant lower in spinal cord white matter in
MS (P=0.009, 0.024, 0.032, respectively). Di,axial, Di,radial and De,radial of spinal
cord white matter in MS were significant lower (P=0.009, 0.024, 0.032,
respectively,) in Branch 2(Da > De,∥) in MS. There was no significant difference
in Branch 1 ( Da ≤ De,∥) metrics.
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
(NMOSD) are diseases of immune system attack and they
lead to disability from nervous system damage usually in adults. In the
past, some NMOSD had been treated as a form of MS. Nowadays, scientific consensus
distinguishes MS and NMOSD because the pathologic processes and effective
treatments are different. However, the usefulness of conventional MR imaging is
limited for morphological changes and demonstration of insufficient lesions1,
and the estimation of hidden or so-called normal-appearing damaged tissue
method remains to be established for both MS and NMOSD. Recently, diffusion
kurtosis imaging-derived white matter tract integrity (WMTI) metrics2, 3
showed promising results that they might provide a more pathologically
specific, clinically meaningful information in brain of MS patients4.
However, there has been two solution branches (Da ≤ De,∥ or Da > De,∥.) depending on sign
choice in WMTI estimation5. The purpose of this study is to investigate both branches of WMTI metrics to distinguish each microstructural
change in the spinal cords in patients with MS and NMOSD in vivo.Methods
In this prospective study, we
enrolled 30 MS patients (age 48±13 years, 23 females; 27 RRMS, 3 SPMS, median
EDSS score 2.0, range 2-45y) and 12 NMOSD patients (age 48±14 years, 10
females). After conventional MR imaging including T2-, T2*- and T1-wegted
imaging, 2-shell diffusion MR imaging data using
regional excitation technique (ZoomIt) were acquired with a Siemens Prisma 3T
scanner with a body coil excitation and 64-ch head/neck coil for reception. Imaging
parameters for 2-shell dMRI were as follows:
repetition time (TR)/echo time, 2200/76 (ms/ms); number of signals acquired, one;
section thickness, 5 mm; 39 slices; in-plane pixel size, 0.9x 0.9
mm; SMS factor, 2; imaging time, approximately 12 min; 2 b values (1000 and
2000 s/mm 2) with two b=0 image and diffusion encoding in 30
direction for every b value. All
diffusion MRI data was transferred to an offline workstation and processed
using in-house developed software in Matlab (R2017a, Math Works, Inc, Natick,
MA) to derive parametric maps of mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis(MK),
fractional anisotropy (FA), axonal water fraction(AWF), axial and radial
intra-axonal diffusivities (Di,axial and Di,radial, respectively) and axial and radial extra-axonal diffusivities
(De,axial and De,radial, respectively)4. We refer to the branches as
Branch 1 (yielding Da ≤ De,∥) and Branch 2 (yielding Da
> De,∥),
as Hansen et al5. Moreover, semi-automated analysis was performed
using the Spinal Cord Toolbox6 for segmentation, motion correction,
registration to WM atlas and extraction of metrics (Figure 1). Between MS and NMOSD, quantitative
metrics in the white matter at C2-C5 were selected and compared. Statistical
evaluations were performed by using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 19.0;
SPSS, Chicago, IL) using Kruskal
Wallis test with multiple comparisons using rank sums among the values of MS
and NMOSD spinal cords. P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically
significant difference.Results
All metrics values of white
matter of spinal cords in patients with MS and NMOSD were summarized in table 1. FA and AWF were significant higher and MD was
significant lower in spinal cord white matter in patients with MS (P=0.009,
0.024, 0.032, respectively, Kruskal Wallis test with multiple comparisons
using rank sums). Di,axial,
Di,radial and De,radial
of spinal cord white matter in patients with MS were significant lower
(P=0.009, 0.024, 0.032, respectively, Kruskal Wallis test with multiple comparisons
using rank sums) in Branch 2(Da
> De,∥) in spinal cord white matter in patients with MS.
There was no difference was shown in Branch 1 ( Da ≤ De,∥) metrics.Discussion
The choice of the branch for
the diffusion metrics, such as WMTI are still under debate. Kouchkovsky(Ref. 4) used the
hypothesis of Branch 1 (Da ≤ De,∥), but some literatures
support the accuracy of Branch 2(Da > De,∥)7,8. Our
results show that WMTI Branch 2 metrics seem to be useful to capture the different
pathological microstructural change in the spinal cord white matter in MS and
NMOSD, presumably different degree of demyelination and axonal damages. More studies of the imaging pathological and clinical
correlation are needed; WMTI Branch 2 (Da > De,∥) metrics has the potential to provide an additional information and to be biomarker in
patients with MS and NMOSD in vivo.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16K10328, the
Canada Research Chair in Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging [950-230815],
the Canadian Institute of Health Research [CIHR FDN-143263], the Canada
Foundation for Innovation [32454, 34824], the Fonds de Recherche du Québec -
Santé [28826], the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies
[2015-PR-182754], the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada [435897-2013], the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (IVADO and
TransMedTech) and the Quebec BioImaging Network [5886].References
1. Miki Y, et
al.Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR
images--lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical
findings. Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):395-9.
2. Fieremans
et al. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging.
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 1;58(1):177-88.
3. Veraart
J, et al. More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion
Kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jan;65(1):138-45.
4. de Kouchkovsky I, et al. Quantification of normal-appearing white
matter tract integrity in multiple sclerosis: a diffusion kurtosis imaging
study. J Neurol. 2016 Jun;263(6):1146-55.
5. Hansen
B, et al. White matter biomarkers from fast protocols using axially symmetric diffusion
kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed. 2017 Sep;30(9). doi: 10.1002/nbm.3741.
6. De Leener B,et al. SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source
software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt
A):24-43.
7. Jespersen
SN, et al. Diffusion time dependence of microstructural parameters in fixed
spinal cord. Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 15;182:329-342.
8. Kunz N, et
al. Intra- and extra-axonal axial diffusivities in the white matter: Which one
is faster? Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:314-322.