Robert J Anderson1, Christopher Long1, Evan D Calabrese2, Scott H Robertson1, Gary P Cofer1, G Allan Johnson1, and Alexandra Badea1
1Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States, 2Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Network
approaches provide sensitive biomarkers for neurological conditions such as
Alzheimer’s disease. Mouse models provide tools to dissect vulnerable circuits
at prodromal stages, and to assess the effects of interventions. We have
simulated mouse brain structural connectomes, balancing angular, spatial
resolution and scan time. Specifically, we evaluated protocols with 6, 12, 15,
20, 30, 45, 60 and 120 angles; and 3 voxel sizes at 43, 86 and 172 µm. Our results indicate schemes using
46 or 60 diffusion directions, acquired at 86 µm resolution achieve a good cost/performance
balance relative to a high spatial, high angular resolution sampling scheme.
Introduction
An altered brain connectivity is
present in a variety of neurologic and psychiatric conditions, yet identifying
affected pathways in animal models remains difficult. High spatial and angular resolution
are required for dissecting vulnerable pathways and networks, but these
requirements need to be balanced against time and cost. Here we simulated the
effect of relaxing acquisition parameters on the accuracy of the reconstructed
tracts and connectome, with reference to a high spatial and angular resolution protocol1. Our results can inform
population studies for models of neurodegenerative disease. Methods
We produced simulations based on a published data set, acquired on a 9.4
T small animal imaging system controlled by an Agilent VnmrJ4 console1. We used a 3D
diffusion-weighted spin-echo pulse sequence with repetition time (TR) = 100 ms,
echo time (TE) = 15 ms, 568 ´ 284 ´ 228 matrix, 24.4´12.2 ´9.8 mm field of view, reconstructed
at 43 µm resolution. 120 diffusion directions2, 3 were acquired using
bvalues of 4000 s/mm2 , interspersed with 11 non-diffusion-weighted
(b0) measurements.
Angular downsampling of the diffusion data was performed by obtaining
the optimal diffusion directions for each angular subset2, 3 and
extracting the closest gradient vector from the 120 unique directions. The
closest gradient was chosen by maximizing the dot product between the optimal
gradient vector and the possible vectors found in the original gradient table. Spatial
downsampling was performed in k space, resulting in 3 levels of isotropic resolution:
43, 86,172 µm.
Data processing was done on a
high-performance computing cluster with 96 physical cores and 1.5 TB of RAM. All
131 image volumes were affinely registered to the first b0 image using Advanced
Normalization Tools (ANTs)4 to correct for eddy
current distortions. Scalar volumes were reconstructed using FSL’s DTIFIT5. Fiber data for
probabilistic tractography were reconstructed using FSL’s BEDPOSTX6 with maximum four fiber
orientations/voxel.
Atlas-based segmentation7 relied on a symmetric 332
regions atlas, combining the Waxholm atlas8 for
subcortical labels, and the Ullmann atlas of the neocortex 9. Connectomes were
constructed using SAMBA10, and DSIStudio11.Results
Down
sampled diffusion data sets were used to estimate the total number of fibers
per voxel in each set (Fig. 1). At each
down sampling of diffusion directions there was a slight decrease in calculated
fibers but the largest change occurred below 45 directions.
We focused
our analysis on the hippocampus, septum, hypothalamus and the lateral
geniculate for gray matter, and we selected the fimbria and fornix as white
matter regions relevant to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A qualitative evaluation of
the fimbria tract density maps reconstructed from 12 directions did not capture
the cortical-cortical connectivity with the same sensitivity as the 45 or 120
direction schemes (Fig 2). Our quantitative analysis of the dyad dispersion (Fig
3) showed that errors decayed as the number of angular samples increases, and increased
as we relaxed the spatial resolution.
Probabilistic
tractography was used to generate connectivity matrices between the selected regions
at 43 µm (Fig. 4). While the correlation between the three connectivity
matrices was always significant (p<0.001), the values increased from 0.65
for the Spearman correlation between 12 and 120 directions; to 0.76 between 12
and 45 directions and to 0.90 between 45 and 120 directions. Moreover, we computed
the pairwise graph similarity for these subgraphs (Fig 4B), thresholding at
0.05 to illustrate the differences in sparsity, which is lowest in between the
45 and 120 directions sets. The sensitivity to capturing connectivity of
smaller region is evident in the chord diagrams (Fig 4C) which are sparser for
12 directions relative to 45, and 120 directions.
Our
results support that angular and spatial resolution need to be balanced with
respect to time and cost demands to enable population studies, and recommend
parameters for efficient protocols with minimum loss of sensitivity.Discussion and Conclusion
Our previous study produced a
diffusion MRI data set with the highest reported resolution for the whole mouse
brain12, with a scan time of 235
hours. Replicating this acquisition for population studies has prohibitive cost
and time. To address this problem, we must develop techniques that produce
similar outcomes to our reference protocol, but with greatly reduced time. In
our simulations, we found that 45-60 angular samples and 43 or 86 µm spatial
resolution achieved a good tradeoff between cost and performance. We evaluated
regions of interest in Alzheimer’s research, from hippocampus (5% of brain
volume) to fimbria and fornix (0.05% of brain volume 13). Our study
can inform the design of future experiments for statistical connectomics in
mouse models of neurological conditions, such as AD. Acknowledgements
NIH awards K01 AG041211 (Badea), P41 EB015897 and 1S10OD010683-01 (Johnson).References
1. Calabrese E, Badea A, Coe CL, Lubach
GR, Shi Y, Styner MA, Johnson GA. A diffusion tensor MRI atlas of the
postmortem rhesus macaque brain. Neuroimage. 2015;117:408-16. PubMed PMID:
26037056.
2. Koay CG. A simple scheme
for generating nearly uniform distribution of antipodally symmetric points on
the unit sphere. J Comput Sci. 2011;2(4):377-81. doi:
10.1016/j.jocs.2011.06.007. PubMed PMID: 22125587; PMCID: PMC3223966.
3. Koay CG, Hurley SA,
Meyerand ME. Extremely efficient and deterministic approach to generating
optimal ordering of diffusion MRI measurements. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4795-801.
doi: 10.1118/1.3615163. PubMed PMID: 21928652; PMCID: PMC3172961.
4. Avants BB, Tustison NJ,
Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity
metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 2011;54(3):2033-44.
Epub 2010/09/21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025. PubMed PMID: 20851191;
PMCID: PMC3065962.
5. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW,
Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, Matthews PM, Brady JM, Smith
SM. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR
imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(5):1077-88. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10609. PubMed
PMID: 14587019.
6. Behrens TE, Berg HJ,
Jbabdi S, Rushworth MF, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with
multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage. 2007;34(1):144-55.
Epub 2006/10/31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018. PubMed PMID: 17070705.
7. Sharief AA, Badea A, Dale
AM, Johnson GA. Automated segmentation of the actively stained mouse brain
using multi-spectral MR microscopy. Neuroimage. 2008;39(1):136-45. doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.028. PubMed PMID: 17933556; PMCID: PMC2139901.
8. Johnson GA, Badea A,
Brandenburg J, Cofer G, Fubara B, Liu S, Nissanov J. Waxholm space: an
image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. Neuroimage.
2010;53(2):365-72. Epub 2010/07/06. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.067.
PubMed PMID: 20600960; PMCID: PMC2930145.
9. Ullmann JF, Watson C,
Janke AL, Kurniawan ND, Reutens DC. A segmentation protocol and MRI atlas of
the C57BL/6J mouse neocortex. Neuroimage. 2013;78:196-203. Epub 2013/04/17.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.008. PubMed PMID: 23587687.
10. Anderson RJC, James J;
Delpratt, Natalie A; Nouls, John C; Gu, Bin; McNamara, James O; Avants, Brian
B; Johnson, G Allan; Badea, Alexandra. Small Animal Multivariate Brain Analysis
(SAMBA): A High Throughput Pipeline with a Validation Framework. rXiv e-prints.
2017.
11. Yeh FC, Verstynen TD, Wang
Y, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tseng WY. Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking
improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80713. PubMed PMID:
24348913.
12. Calabrese E, Badea A, Cofer
G, Qi Y, Johnson GA. A Diffusion MRI Tractography Connectome of the Mouse Brain
and Comparison with Neuronal Tracer Data. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(11):4628-37.
PubMed PMID: 26048951.
13. Badea A, Kane L, Anderson
RJ, Qi Y, Foster M, Cofer GP, Medvitz N, Buckley AF, Badea AK, Wetsel WC,
Colton CA. The fornix provides multiple biomarkers to characterize circuit
disruption in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage.
2016;142:498-511. Epub 2016/08/16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.014.
PubMed PMID: 27521741; PMCID: PMC5159324.