Moritz Jörg Schneider1,2, Thomas Gaass1,2, Julien Dinkel1,2, Jens Ricke1, and Olaf Dietrich1
1Department of Radiology, LMU University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
In this study different intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)
MRI methods were assessed and compared using phantom measurement. The phantom
was constructed to mimic a capillary bed and allowed for the controlled
application of fluid flow at varying rates. Advanced IVIM MRI methods beyond the biexponential pseudo-diffusion
model were shown to be capable of accurately characterizing fluid flow inside a
capillary network yielding intuitive parameters in a reproducible manner.
Introduction
Intravoxel
incoherent motion imaging (IVIM)1 allows to assess capillary perfusion
non-invasively using diffusion-weighted MRI. IVIM-MRI data is commonly analyzed
using the biexponential pseudo-diffusion model2 yielding the tissue diffusivity $$$D$$$, the
fraction $$$f$$$ of signal attributed to blood in perfused capillaries and the
pseudo-diffusion coefficient $$$D^\ast$$$. Recently, a "phase-distribution" approach based on the simulation of particle pathways
while considering a distribution of particle speeds was presented3. In place of $$$D^\ast$$$, this method yields the (average)
particle flow speed $$$v$$$, the time $$$t$$$ until a particle changes its
movement direction and also the length of a capillary segment via $$$l=vt$$$. However,
the in-vivo validation of IVIM-MRI methods is inherently difficult. Measures
such as the blood flow velocity and the capillary length are challenging to
determine in vivo and they cannot easily be regulated. Therefore, the purpose
of this study is the systematic analysis of IVIM MRI methods using a perfusable
capillary phantom.Methods
As
previously described4,5, a perfusable capillary phantom designed to mimic fluid flow inside a interconnected
network of randomly oriented channels was constructed using sacrificial sugar
fibers embedded in synthetic resin. The capillary network was
characterized using optical microscopy. The phantom allowed for the application
of controlled fluid flow at variable
rates while performing IVIM-MRI experiments on a 3 T whole-body MRI
system (Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). For each flow rate (ranging
from 0.2 ml/min to 2.4 ml/min),
data was acquired using four different single shot EPI DW-MRI sequences (two
with monopolar diffusion gradient schemes and two with flow-compensated schemes
of varying diffusion preparation duration) with up to 16 b-values between 0 and
800s/mm². Signal intensities were averaged over a region of interest covering the
capillary network and subsequently analyzed using the phase-distribution model
as well as the biexponential pseudo-diffusion model (only the data from one
sequence with monopolar gradients was used for the biexponential model). For
the biexponential model, $$$v$$$ was calculated via6 $$$v=6D^\ast/l$$$. The phase-distribution model accounted
for a continuous particle speed distribution (derived from a Pareto distribution) based on findings7 about fluid flow in fracture networks. A second
measurement series was performed on a different day to assess the
reproducibility.Results
Optical
microscopy revealed a dense and highly interconnected network of randomly
oriented capillaries strewn with spherical dilations (Figure 1). Optical
microscopy yielded the average capillary length of 162±78µm, the average
capillary diameter of 11.4±4.4µm and the
ratio of the volume
inside the capillaries to the total (capillaries
plus dilations)
network volume of 0.454±0.002. The acquired data was best described by a
two-compartment model consisting of a static and a flowing compartment. Exemplary
fits of the phase-distribution model are illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 3 displays
the estimated parameters using the phase-distribution model for both
measurement series. A regression analysis of the particle speed $$$v$$$ versus
the applied flow is displayed in Figure 4. Figure 5 compares the signal
fraction $$$f$$$ and $$$v$$$ estimated using the phase-distribution model
versus the biexponential model.Discussion
The
phase-distribution model allowed for an excellent fit to the acquired data at
all flow rates and yielded reasonable parameter estimates with little variation
in between measurement series. The estimated signal fraction $$$f$$$ attributed to the flowing compartment stayed
approximately constant over the applied flow rates and agreed well with
the ratio of the volume inside the capillaries to the total (capillaries plus dilations)
network volume estimated via optical
microscopy. Thus, the static compartment is hypothesized to be
ascribed to non-flowing liquid inside the spherical dilations. Judging from the highly significant linear proportionality, practically
all variation in $$$v$$$ is predictable from the applied flow rate. At very slow flow rates, the characteristic
duration $$$t$$$ until
a directional change occurs could not be determined with satisfactory accuracy.
At flow rates greater than 0.8ml/min, $$$t$$$ showed an inverse proportionality to the
applied flow rate. Consequently, the estimated capillary segment length of
about 195μm stayed approximately constant in this domain and agreed well with
the value determined via optical microscopy. Using the biexponential model, the signal fraction
$$$f$$$ was heavily underestimated and displayed a strong
dependence on the applied flow rate. Yet, the estimated particle speed
closely followed the particle speed
determined using the phase-distribution model.
Clonclusion
The
constructed phantom facilitated the detailed investigation of IVIM-MRI methods. The results demonstrate that the advanced phase-distribution
method is capable of accurately characterizing fluid flow inside a capillary
network. Parameters estimated using the conventional biexponential model,
specifically the perfusion fraction $$$f$$$, were shown to
be subject to a potential bias if the model assumptions are not met by the
underlying flow pattern.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D,
Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent
motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology.
1986;161(2):401-407. doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909
2. Le Bihan D, Breton
E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion
and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology.
1988;168(2):497-505. doi:10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671
3. Wetscherek, A.,
Stieltjes, B. & Laun, F. B. Flow-compensated intravoxel incoherent motion
diffusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 74, 410–419 (2015).
4. Bellan LM, Singh
SP, Henderson PW, Porri TJ, Craighead HG, Spector JA. Fabrication of an
artificial 3-dimensional vascular network using sacrificial sugar structures. Soft
Matter. 2009;5(7):1354. doi:10.1039/b819905a
5. Gaass T, Schneider
MJ, Dietrich O, Ingrisch M, Dinkel J. Technical Note: Quantitative dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI of a 3-dimensional artificial capillary network. Med
Phys. 2017;44(4):1462-1469. doi:10.1002/mp.12162
6. Bihan DL, Turner R.
The capillary network: a link between ivim and classical perfusion. Magn
Reson Med. 1992;27(1):171-178. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910270116
7. Frampton A,
Cvetkovic V. Upscaling particle transport in discrete fracture networks: 1.
Nonreactive tracers. Water Resour Res. 2007;43(10):W10428.
doi:10.1029/2006WR005334