Constantin Dreher1, Tristan Anselm Kuder2, Stefan Windhaber1, Franziska König1, Daniel Paech1, Anoshirwan Tavakoli1, Frederik B. Laun2,3, Florian Flothow2, Regula Gnirs1, Thomas Benkert4, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, and Sebastian Bickelhaupt1
1Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, 2Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, 3Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany, 4Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Diffusion-Weighted
imaging is a mainstay for oncologic examinations. However, abdominal
examinations with standard DWI can be challenged by signal exploration and
motion artifacts. This prospective study therefore compares a standard EPI-DWI
with an oncologically optimized-DWI, including complex averaging, motion
correction between averages, rescaling of motion corrupted averages, and
background suppression, in oncological follow-up MRI investigations. A
diffusion resolution phantom demonstrated an improved image quality by the
optimized-DWI. Image quality analysis of prospectively acquired abdominal DWI
MRI examinations in 52 patients showed a significant improvement in image
quality and apparent signal-to-background-noise-ratio by optimized-DWI as
compared to standard EPI-DWI in oncologic imaging.
Introduction
Diffusion-Weighted imaging (DWI) is an important part of oncological
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, abdominal studies can be challenged
by motion artifacts, poor signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) and visibility of
retroperitoneal structures, which is why it needs to be improved depending on
the investigated region[1]. This
study aims at prospectively evaluating an oncologically adapted DWI sequence
for improved image quality and tissue differentiation in patients with
abdominal malignancies.Methods
This IRB-approved, prospective
in-vivo and ex-vivo study included phantom measurements and oncological patient
examinations of the abdomen. For the phantom experiments, a diffusion resolution
phantom was used with chambers of triangular cross section containing aqueous
polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP-K30) solution with alternating concentration and thus
different diffusion-coefficients (10%w/w and 43%w/w corresponding to
D=1.6µm²/ms and D=0.5µm²/ms).
52 prospectively acquired oncologic
abdominal MRI examinations (mean age: 57years; male/female: 21/31) using a 1.5T
MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany) included both a
standard-EPI-DWI (“s-DWI”; b=50,900s/mm²) and an oncologically adapted,
prototype optimized-DWI (“opt-DWI”; EPI-DWI with b=0,50,900,1500s/mm² and
advanced processing, including complex averaging, motion correction between the
averages, rescaling of motion corrupted averages, and background suppression).
The following parameters were used
for s-DWI: TR=6.5s; TE=63ms; FOV 450x242mm²; matrix 134x72; resolution
3.4x3.4mm², interpolated to 1.7x1.7mm²; slice thickness 5mm; bandwidth
2332Hz/Px; b-values 50,900s/mm² (2,8 averages), gradient mode 3-scan trace, 90
slices in 3 steps, 11min. For opt-DWI: TR=7.9s; TE=57ms; FOV 480x270mm²; matrix
164x92; resolution 3x3mm², interpolated to 1.5x1.5mm²; slice thickness 5mm;
bandwidth 2540Hz/Px; b-values 0,50,900,1500s/mm² (1,1,16,18 averages); gradient
mode 3D-diagonal; 90 slices in 3 steps, 15min.
At the setting of b=900s/mm², apparent-ratio
of signal intensity in the normal tissue/standard deviation in the non-background-suppressed
surrounding air was quantitatively evaluated, image quality and tissue
differentiation parameters were rated by two independent, blinded readers using
a 5-point Likert-Scale[2]. Statistics included
Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test and kappa-statistic (p<0.05).Results
The DWI-phantom demonstrated an
optimized contour sharpness and inlay differentiation for the opt-DWI (Figure
1).
The apparent-ratio of the signal
intensity of normal tissue/standard deviation of non-background-suppressed
surrounding air of b900-DWI of the right/left hemiabdomen was significantly
increased in opt-DWI (mean: 227±250/150±192) vs. s-DWI (mean: 37±17/40±23)
(p<0.001). Image quality parameters (contour sharpness right/left liver and
pancreas) were significantly increased in opt-DWI vs. s-DWI (p<0.001)
(Figure 2,3). Central parts of the abdomen had decreased shading effects in
opt-DWI vs. s-DWI (Figure 3). Tissue differentiation for the upper abdominal
and retroperitoneal structures was significantly increased in opt-DWI vs. s-DWI
(p<0.001) (Figure 2). Interreader reliability test showed good agreement
(kappa=0.754) (p<0.001).Discussion
This study prospectively evaluated an
oncologically adapted DWI by ex-vivo phantom measurements and in-vivo
oncological follow-up MRI examinations. The superiority of the optimized
prototype DWI, including improved
image resolution, motion correction between the averages, background
suppression and decreased shading effects by rescaling of motion corrupted
averages, could be demonstrated. Oncological DWI optimization
should be performed to improve screening and follow-up examinations[3],
possibly leading to an advanced patient care.Conclusion
This prospective study demonstrates the
superiority of an oncologically optimized DWI with an improved image
resolution, motion correction between the averages and background suppression
over standard EPI-DWI for abdominal oncological imaging. Assessment of
anatomical structures including the retroperitoneum was significantly improved
using the novel approach in oncological follow-ups.Acknowledgements
Special acknowledgments and thanks to Siemens
Healthineers for providing the optimized prototype sequence and protocol that
did build the basis of the further adapted sequence.References
1. Taron, J., et al., Clinical Robustness of Accelerated and
Optimized Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. Invest Radiol, 2017. 52(10): p. 590-595.
2. de Winter,
J.C.F., Dodou, D., Five-point Likert
items: T test versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research
& Evaluation, 2010. 15(11): p. 16.
3. Zhang, T.T., et
al., Differentiation of pancreatic
carcinoma and mass-forming focal pancreatitis: qualitative and quantitative
assessment by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with diffusion-weighted
imaging. Oncotarget, 2017. 8(1):
p. 1744-1759.