Zifei Liang1 and Jiangyang Zhang1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Diffusion
MRI based fiber orientation distribution (FOD) estimates are widely used to
examine structural connectivity in the brain. For group comparison using nonlinear
spatial normalization, FOD needs to be adjusted based on the estimated degree
of rotation and scaling at each voxel. We compared the current method implemented
in Mrtrix for spatial normalization of FODs with an image-based method. The
results suggest that the method in Mrtrix is accurate for rotation but generates
potential bias in FOD peak amplitude and orientation when large anisotropic
scaling is present. This knowledge is important for studies to use spatially
normalized FOD maps.
Introduction
Fiber
orientation distribution (FOD) estimated from diffusion MRI data provides critical
information on structural connectivity in the brain [1,2,3]. For group comparison, spatially normalize that
maps individual subject images to a common template for voxel-based analysis results
in varying degrees of rotation and scaling at each voxel, which requires
adjusting the orientation of FODs accordingly [4].
Currently, spatial
normalization of FOD data can be performed using MRtrix [5,6,7]. It samples a
given FOD with a set of vectors equally distributed over a sphere and, by
reorienting the set of vectors based on local linear approximation of the
mapping, reconstructs a new FOD followed by amplitude corrections to remove
negative peaks. The accuracy of FOD mapping using this method, however, has not
been investigated in details.
In this
study, we compared the FOD normalization method implemented in MRtrix 3.0 with
an image-based approach. In our approach, diffusion MRI data are first mapped
to the template, reorient the originally uniform gradient table at each pixel to
generate a non-uniform gradient table, and perform FOD estimation. We compared
the outcomes of the two methods using data from the human connectome project
(HCP) datasets under several scenarios (rotation, scaling, and nonlinear normalization)
to investigate the accuracy of the two methods. Method
We selected
9 subject data from the HCP dataset to compare the two FOD mapping methods with
rotation (5, 15, and 30 degrees), scaling (1.1, 1.5, and 2 times along the
left-right axis), and nonlinear image mapping. To remove the effects of
interpolation, nearest neighbor interpolation was used in all experiments.
Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean DWI from
the original data were used to generate a mapping between subject and template
data. The template was selected from one of the HCP datasets. We then use the
mapping to transform all DWI data to the template space. We calculated the Jacobian
matrix at each voxel from the mapping and used it as a linear approximation of
image deformation. Instead of using the Jacobian matrix to reorient FODs as in
MRtrix [5], we used it to reorient diffusion gradient table as.
v'i=Tvi Eq.
1
Where vi is the ¡ th gradient corresponding to the ¡ th diffusion encoding vector, T is the Jacobian
matrix, and v'i is the output diffusion encoding vector. We then
performed FOD fitting with transformed diffusion weighted imaging and adjusted
gradient table voxel by voxel.
For the experiments with rotation and
scaling, we estimated the ground truth FODs based on the degree of rotation and
scaling. For nonlinear image mapping, we compared the differences in FOD peak
direction and amplitude between FOD data generated from the two methods.
Results
Fig. 1 compares
FODs reconstructed using MRtrix and image-based method. After rotation, the
reoriented FODs from both methods showed minimal difference from ground truth
(Fig. 2A-B). After scaling along the left-right direction, the MRtrix results
showed more deviations from the ground truth in terms of peak orientation and
amplitude (Fig. 2C-D). In some cases, the orientated FOD from MRtrix showed reduced
FOD amplitude along the peak direction and enlarged secondary lobe compared to image-based
method produced FOD and the original FODs (Fig. 1B).
Fig.3A shows
an example of uniform gradient vector fields compared to non-uniform gradient
vector fields due to spatial normalization used in the image-based method. Fig.
3B compares the reconstructed FODs from the template and subject data as well
as transformed FOD maps using the two methods. Differences in peak amplitude
and orientation can be appreciated in the corpus callosum. Large differences in
peak amplitude and orientation between the two methods were found in several
regions (e.g. region 3 in Fig. 4A-B) and mostly in regions with large
deformation (measured using the Jacobian determinant, Fig. 4D). Discussion
In
this study, the image-based method used non-uniform gradient tables to estimate
FODs, which should provide accurate results. The results suggest that both
methods can re-orient FOD after image rotation accurately. For mapping involves
large anisotropic scaling, the results from MRtrix can differ from the results
from the image-based methods. The image-based method, however, has a much higher
computational cost than the method implemented in MRtrix and requires original
diffusion MRI data. It is therefore important to understand the potential FOD
alterations using MRtrix when there is major anisotropic scaling in the spatial
normalization process. Conclusion
When
using the method implemented in MRtrix to transform FOD maps, it is important
to consider the potential alterations in FOD peak amplitude and orientation due
to anisotropic scaling in the image transformation. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]. J.-D. Tournier, F. Calamante, D.G. Gadian, and A. Connelly. Direct estimation of the
fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using
spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage 23, pp 1176-1185. (2004).
[2]. J. Tournier, F. Calamante and A. Connelly.
Robust determination of the fiber orientation distribution in diffusion MRI:
Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage
35, pp 1459-1472. (2007).
[3]. K.G. Schilling, V. Janve, Y. Gao,
I. Stepniewska and B.A. Landman et al. Histological validation of diffusion MRI
fiber orientation distributions and dispersion. NeuroImage 165, pp 200-221
(2018).
[4]. X. Hong, L. R. Arlinghaus and A.W. Anderson. Spatial normalization of the
fiber orientation distribution based on high angular resolution diffusion
imaging data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61. Pp. 1520-1527. (2009).
[5]. D. Raffelt, J.D. Tournier, S.
Crozier A. Connelly and O. Salvado. Reorientation
of fiber orientation distributions using Apodized Point Spread Functions. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 67, pp. 844-855 (2012).
[6]. D. Raffelt, J.D. Tournier, S. Rose,
G.R. Ridgway, and R. Henderson et al. Apparent Fiber Density: A novel measure
for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage
59. pp. 3976-3994. (2012).
[7]. D. Haffelt, , J.D. Tournier, J.
Fripp, S. Crozier and A. Connelly et al. Symmetric diffeomorphic registration
of fiber orientation distributions. NeuroImage 56, pp. 1171-1180. (2011).