Xueying Zhao1, Jingjing Shi2, Fei Dai1, Wenzhen Zhu2, and He Wang1
1Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Synopsis
Neurite orientation dispersion and density
imaging (NODDI) is a specific designed diffusion model for brain, which
provides insights into intra-cellular water contents. Here, we investigated the
brain development from 0 to 14 years old using NODDI. The whole brain was
divided into 159 regions including cortical gray matter, deep gray matter (dGM)
and white matter, and was analyzed through exponential regression. Neurite
density presented a higher sensitivity to age-related changes than FA, especially in gray matters. Regional specific asymmetry was
found between hemispheres in dGM. Sex difference was observed in the
developmental rate of GM.
Introduction
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been
widely used to detect the anatomical changes during brain development. The changes
in fractional anisotropy (FA) and diffusivity are thought to reflect myelination,
neuronal growth and pruning. However, DTI lacks the
specificity to disentangle microstructures in brain. As a biophysical
compartment model, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging1
(NODDI) can provide new parameters such as neurite density (ND) and orientation
dispersion (OD), which give insights into the intra-cellular compartment we are
interested in. Here, we used NODDI to investigate the brain development from 0
to 14 years old. A whole brain atlas-based maturing pattern was
obtained, including cortical gray matter (cGM), deep gray matter (dGM) and
white matter (WM). Regional variation, cerebral asymmetry and sex difference were
discussed in this study through quantitative analysis.Materials and methods
The study was approved by the Women and
Children Health Care Center in Wuhan City Ethics Committee. 217 subjects (135
boys, 82 girls; age range:1day-14years) who underwent brain MRI for non-neurological
indications were included in our study. Their whole brain
DWIs were acquired with 10 non-diffusion weighted (b=0 s/mm
2)
images, and 30 diffusion weighted (b=1000, 2000 s/mm
2) images each
along 15 directions; NEX=2, TR/TE=4800/92.9ms, voxel size=1.9*1.9*3 mm
3,
scan time=6min 29s. After image pre-processing, 7 parameters (ND, OD, isotropic
volume fraction (ISOVF), FA, axial/radial/mean diffusivity (AD/RD/MD)) were
obtained for each voxel from NODDI and DTI (representative mappings were shown in Fig. 1). The
JHU Pediatric (24month) Atlas with a 159-region segmentation was used for
normalization. Average values of parameters were calculated within each region.
Exponential regression $$$Y=C+Ae^{-age/\tau}$$$ was applied for quantitative
analysis where $$$C$$$, $$$-A$$$ and time constant $$$\tau$$$ can represent the mature
value, the total change and the developmental rate of $$$Y$$$ respectively. For sex
difference analysis, boys and girls were fitted separately and compared using
the two-sample two-tailed
t test.
Results
As shown in Fig. 2, ND has the highest sensitivity
to age-related changes, where the average correlation coefficients over all
brain regions for ND and FA are 0.703 and 0.623, respectively. Results of
exponential regression were displayed in Fig.3, regions in cGM, dGM and WM were
represented as scatters with coordinate ($$$C$$$, $$$-A$$$, $$$\tau$$$), and noted by different
colors. cGM can be distinguished from WM with a smaller $$$C$$$ (P=1.110×10-16) and a smaller $$$–A$$$ (P=0).
However, dGM were mixed with both cGM and WM. In deep GM, hemispheric difference
was observed with regional variation (Fig. 4). ND of the left hemisphere were
larger in globus pallidus, putamen, amygdala and hippocampus. Conversely, ND of
the right side were larger in caudate and thalamus all along the developmental
timescale. No sex difference was observed in the newborn value $$$C+A$$$ in GM (P=0.658)
nor in WM (P=0.756). The mature value $$$C$$$ also showed no difference between
genders, with P=0.738 in GM and P=0.279 in WM. However, statistical
significance was found in time constant $$$\tau$$$ of GM (P=1.164×10-12), though no difference was seen
in WM (P=0.259), as shown in the box and whiskers plot in Fig. 5.Discussion
The higher sensitivity of ND to brain
development observed in our study is consistent with previous comparison studies
between NODDI and DTI2,3. Also a strong correlation of cerebral neurite
density with the intensity of myelin stain under light microscopy was
corroborated by postmortem histology study4. This is unsurprising because
ND provides information of water content from intra-cellular, which may be more
associated with microstructural changes happened during development. WM
underwent greater ND growth than cGM, reflecting a relative smaller occupation
of myelinated axons in cGM. The hemispheric asymmetry developmental trajectories
found in dGM agrees with the former research on subcortical volumes5.
Sex difference was only seen in GM, the smaller $$$\tau$$$ of boys
is caused by a higher ND during early development (from 0 to 5 years old under
our context) in GM. We can infer that the GM of boys underwent rapid neuronal
growth during early development, which may contribute to the lager neuron
numbers and the well known bigger brain size of males6.Conclusion
Neurite density has shown to be a promising
biomarker in brain development, with higher sensitivity than FA, especially in
gray matters. Thus, NODDI can be a useful tool in brain development and aging
description, as well as neurodevelopmental abnormity detection.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. H. Zhang, T. Schneider, C.A.
Wheeler-Kingshott, D.C. Alexander, NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation
dispersion and density imaging of the human brain, NeuroImage, 61 (2012)
1000-1016.
2. A. Mah, B. Geeraert, C. Lebel, Detailing
neuroanatomical development in late childhood and early adolescence using
NODDI, PloS one, 12 (2017) e0182340.
3. S. Genc, C.B. Malpas, S.K. Holland, R.
Beare, T.J. Silk, Neurite density index is sensitive to age related differences
in the developing brain, NeuroImage, 148 (2017) 373-380.
4. S.N. Jespersen, C.R. Bjarkam, J.R.
Nyengaard, M.M. Chakravarty, B. Hansen, T. Vosegaard, L. Østergaard, D.
Yablonskiy, N.C. Nielsen, P. Vestergaard-Poulsen, Neurite density from magnetic
resonance diffusion measurements at ultrahigh field: Comparison with light
microscopy and electron microscopy, NeuroImage, 49 (2010) 205-216.
5. M. Dennison, S. Whittle, M. Yücel, N.
Vijayakumar, A. Kline, J. Simmons, N.B. Allen, Mapping subcortical brain
maturation during adolescence: evidence of hemisphere- and sex-specific
longitudinal changes, Developmental Science, 16 (2013) 772-791.
6. B. Pakkenberg, H.J.G. Gundersen,
Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sex and age, Journal of
Comparative Neurology, 384 (1997) 312-320.