Mengge He1, Zuohua Tang1, zebin xiao1, Linying Guo1, and Zhongshuai Zhang2
1EENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2SIEMENS Healthcare, Diagnostic Imaging, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Previous studies already reported that RESOLVE DWI can
significantly reduce the susceptibility induced image distortion artifacts [1;
2; 3]. This study used RESOLVE DWI and
conventional MRI to differentiate sinonasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas
from diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.
Purpose
To
explore the feasibility of discrimination between natural
killer (NK)/T-cell lymphomas (NKTLs)
and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) using the readout
segmented EPI (RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) technique combined with
conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Materials and Methods:
Sixty-five patients (46
females, 19 males; mean age, 59.6 ± 14.1 years) with sinonasal lymphomas underwent
RESOLVE DWI as well as conventional MRI (T1W, T2W and contrast-enhanced T1WI
with fat suppression). All the exams were performed on a 3T MR scanner
(MAGNETOM Verio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The enrolled 65
patients include 45 NKTLs (35 men and 10 women; mean age, 57.5 ± 15.1 years)
and 20 DLBCLs (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 60.9 ± 11.7 years) and both groups
were confirmed by histopathology. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value acquired
by RESOLVE and conventional MRI features were compared between NKTLs and DLBCLs
using multivariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off ADC value and diagnostic
performance in distinguishing between NKTLs and DLBCLs. The area under the curves
(AUCs) were compared between conventional MRI and a combination with DWI.Results:
As shown in Fig 1, for
differentiating between NKTLs and DLBCLs, by using conventional MRI (tumor location
in nasal cavity for NKTLs versus in paranasal sinus for DLBCLs) the sensitivity,
specificity, and AUC were 95.2%, 78.3% and 0.894, respectively.; Those for the
combination of conventional MRI and DWI (a cut-off ADC value of 0.646×10-3
mm2/s) 91.7%, 94.0%, and 0.973, respectively. A significant
difference of AUC was found between conventional MRI and a combination with DWI
(p = 0.02)(Figs 2 and 3). Representative MRI and histopathological images are
shown in Figs 4 and 5.Conclusions:
Location
was the most valuable conventional MRI feature for differentiating between NKTLs
and DLBCLs. A combination of DWI could significantly improve the differential
performance.Acknowledgements
This work was
supported by the Grant of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai
Municipality (Grant number: 17411962100)
and Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
number: 61731009).References
[1] M. Zhao, Z.
Liu, Y. Sha, S. Wang, X. Ye, Y. Pan, and S. Wang, Readout-segmented echo-planar
imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of
image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 34
(2016) 166-172.
[2] F. Wang, Y.
Sha, M. Zhao, H. Wan, F. Zhang, Y. Cheng, and W. Tang, High-Resolution
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic
Contrast-Enhanced Sinonasal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Computer
Assisted Tomography 41 (2017) 199-205.
[3] X. Wang, Z.
Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Li, and J. Xian, Effectiveness of 3 T PROPELLER DUO
diffusion-weighted MRI in differentiating sinonasal lymphomas and carcinomas.
Clinical Radiology 69 (2014) 1149-1156.