Ke Zhang1,2, Johann M.E. Jende2, Volker J. Sturm2, Lukas R. Buschle1, Artur Hahn2, Sabine Heiland2, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, Martin Bendszus2, Christian H. Ziener1, and Felix T. Kurz2
1Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, 2Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
Peripheral
neuropathy in diabetes is a common and poorly understood disease; previous
methods to evaluate nerve-associated microvascular angiopathy are
contrast-based and exclude patients with severe nephropathies or allergies to
contrast agents. We adapt a combined a flow-sensitive alternating inversion
recovery (FAIR)-sequence with a single-voxel readout such as Point RESolved
Spectroscopy (PRESS) to measure peripheral nerve perfusion in healthy subjects
and diabetes patients. Our preliminary results suggest that diabetes patients
have a lower nerve/muscle
perfusion ratio than non-diabetic subjects.
INTRODUCTION
While distal diabetic neuropathy is a frequent and yet poorly
understood complication of diabetes, neural changes are associated with changes
in lipid metabolism and microvascular angiopathy1. Previous
measurements of neural perfusion, however, use contrast-enhanced imaging that
excludes patients with severe nephropathies or allergies to contrast agents. By
combining a flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR)-sequence with a
single-voxel readout, such as Point RESolved Spectroscopy (PRESS), non-invasive
perfusion measurements of tissues with low signal noise ratio is possible. This
technique has been applied to access white matter perfusion2,3 and
rat skeletal muscle perfusion4. In this study, we adapt the FAIR
PRESS sequence to measure peripheral nerve perfusion in healthy subjects and
diabetes patients. The perfusion of peripheral nerve is compared to that of
skeletal muscle.METHODS
6
subjects (4 healthy; 2 diabetes) were scanned using a 15-channel knee
transmit/receive RF coil on a 3T Trio Siemens scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
Sequence parameters of FAIR PRESS with QUIPSS II5 were as follows:
TE/TR=30/2300 ms, TI1/TI=800/1500 ms, voxel size of muscle=15×15×15
mm3, voxel size of nerve=8×8×8 mm3, spectral
bandwidth=2000 Hz, measurements=60 (30 control-label pairs). The placement of
muscle and nerve voxels was based on a T2 measurement (Figure 1).
Perfusion analysis was performed using in-house developed MATLAB code
(MathWorks, Natick, MA). The free induction decays (FIDs) of each acquisition
of FAIR PRESS were truncated, zero filled, filtered with an apodization filter
of 15 Hz, phase corrected, and Fourier transformed. The data were then
combined by adding the root of the sum of squares of the individual signals
from the different coils. The central 100 points of the water line peak were
used for perfusion analysis (Figure 2). Perfusion quantification was performed
as in literature6.RESULTS
Perfusion ratios between nerve
and muscle from all subjects are presented in Table 1. Relative lower nerve
perfusion was found in diabetes patients. However, the sample size is still too
small for a fair comparison between healthy subjects and diabetes patients.CONCLUSION
This
study demonstrates the feasibility of perfusion measurement of peripheral nerve
using a FAIR PRESS sequence. While still preliminary, a comparison between
diabetic and healthy subjects shows differences in neural perfusion. The
sequence may thus aid in the evaluation of the extent and correlation of
nerve-associated angiopathy with neural lesions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Jende
JME, Groener JB, Oikonomou D, et al. Diabetic neuropathy differs
between type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Insights from magnetic resonance
neurography. Ann Neurol 2018;83(3):588-598.
2. Pohmann
R. Accurate, localized quantification of white matter perfusion with
single-voxel ASL. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(4):1109-1113.
3. Zhang
X, Ronen I, Kan HE, et al. Time-efficient measurement of multi-phase arterial
spin labeling MR signal in white matter. NMR Biomed 2016;29(11):1519-1525.
4. Pohmann R, Kunnecke B, Fingerle J,
et al. Fast perfusion
measurements in rat skeletal muscle at rest and during exercise with
single-voxel FAIR (flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery). Magnet Reson
Med 2006;55(1):108-115.
5. Wong
EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single
subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magnet Reson Med 1998;39(5):702-708.
6. Alsop
DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended Implementation of Arterial
Spin-Labeled Perfusion MRI for Clinical Applications: A Consensus of the ISMRM
Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in Dementia. Magnet
Reson Med 2015;73(1):102-116.