Zeyu Zheng1, Jing Zhang1, Yuefa Tan1, Huiyan Li1, Yingjie Mei2, Queenie Chan3, and Yikai Xu1
1Department of Medical Center, Nanfang hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, 3Philips Healthcare, Hongkong, China
Synopsis
Accurate glioma grading is crucial for
therapeutic strategy and prognosis. T1ρ MRI could probe the interactions
between motion-restricted water and macromolecules in tissues. Our study aimed
to determine the diagnostic efficiency of T1ρ MRI in glioma grading.
Significant differences were found by rT1ρ between low- and high-grade, WHO
grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ, WHO grade Ⅱ and Ⅳ gliomas when we placed the ROIs in the solid
portion and the peritumoral portion respectively. rT1ρ demonstrated a high
diagnostic performance in the solid portion and a moderate diagnostic
performance in the peritumoral portion in grading. T1ρ MRI has potential to be
a noninvasive quantitative method for preoperatively grading gliomas.
Introduction
Accurate glioma
grading is crucial for therapeutic strategy and prognosis. To our knowledge, histopathologic
assessment is an invasive procedure that leads to inherent sampling error
without regarding for tumor heterogeneity depended on sterotactic biopsy or
surgery resection1.T1 relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρ)
MRI, which occurs at a range of frequencies during the application of the
spin-lock pulse, is sensitive to low-frequency motion that
it could be applied to probe the interactions between motion-restricted water
and macromolecules in tissues2. Up
to now, T1ρ MRI has only been implemented in cerebral gliomas based
on the animal model3,4. Therefore, the present study aimed to
determine the diagnostic efficiency of T1ρ MRI in glioma grading at
3.0T. Methods
38 patients (Mean age 39.1 yrs; 14F/24M) with
histopathologic confirmed glioma who underwent T1ρ MRI at 3T were enrolled,
including 22 low-grade gliomas (WHO grade Ⅱ) and 16 high-grade gliomas (7 WHO
grade Ⅲ and 9 WHO grade Ⅳ). MRI sequences were acquired with a Phillips Achieva
TX 3.0 Tesla scanner using an 8-channel phased-array head coil. T1ρ-weighted
images were collected by 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) technique with the
following parameters: TR/TE = 4800/229 ms; matrix = 240 × 240; FOV = 250 mm ×
250 mm; slice thickness = 1.8 mm; number of slices =100; spin lock frequency =
500 Hz; spin lock time (TSL) = 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 ms. In T1ρ relaxation
map, three ROIs were positioned in the solid portion and the peritumoral
portion of tumor respectively. The averaged value of three ROIs were calculated
and standardized as a ratio of T1ρ value (rT1ρ) by
placing three same size ROIs in normal white/gray matter of the contralateral
hemisphere. Comparisons between different grades gliomas were performed.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to determine
the diagnostic performance for grading. Results
Figure 1 shows
representative images of 3 cases of different grades gliomas. In the solid
portion, rT1ρ of high-grade group was significantly lower than that of
low-grade group (P<0.001). To the contrary, higher rT1ρ was found in
high-grade group than in low-grade group in the peritumoral portion (P<0.01)
(Table1 and Figure 2A). When classified according to WHO grades, WHO grade Ⅱ
group had higher rT1ρ of solid portion compared with WHO grade Ⅲ (P<0.01)
and Ⅳ group (P<0.001) separately. WHO grade Ⅱ group had lower rT1ρ of
peritumoral portion compared with WHO grade Ⅲ (P<0.05) and Ⅳ group
(P<0.05) separately. No significant differences were found between WHO grade
Ⅲ and Ⅳ group in rT1ρ, of solid portion or peritumoral
portion (both P >0.05) (Table 2, Figure 2B). rT1ρ
of solid portion achieved an AUC value of 0.909, and the cut-off value of 1.964
exhibited a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 100% for identifying
low-grade group. With AUC value of 0.744, rT1ρ of peritumoral portion show 81.3%
sensitivity and 63.6% specificity for identifying high-grade group at the
cut-off value of 1.750 (Table 3, Figure 3).
Discussion
In the solid
portion, rT1ρ of high-grade gliomas was significantly lower than that of
low-grade gliomas. The dominant factor influencing difference of rT1ρ values
between different grades of gliomas is cell density. Theoretically, dense tumor
cells in advanced gliomas may compress extracellular space and impede free
water movement which is accompanied by the increase of water associated with
macromolecules4,5, and thus leads to a decreased rT1ρ value. In the
peritumoral portion, higher rT1ρ value was demonstrated in high-grade gliomas
than in low-grade gliomas. We consider that peritumoral edema associated with
gliomas was not only caused by extensive infiltration of glioma cells, but
malignant cell infiltration is more likely to destruct the extracellular matrix
ultrastructure and consequently aggravate free water movement in high-grade
gliomas6. In this present study, we demonstrated a high diagnostic
performance by rT1ρ of solid portion for differentiating low- from high-grade
gliomas with excellent sensitivity of 100%. Moreover, rT1ρ of peritumoral
portion also performed a moderate diagnostic performance for differentiating
high- from low-grade gliomas. Conclusion
The results of our clinical study suggest that T1ρ
MRI is potential to be a noninvasive quantitative method for preoperatively
grading gliomas.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Law
M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and
predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging
compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;
24:1989-1998.
2. Li
X, Benjamin Ma C, Link TM, et al. In vivo T1ρ and T2 mapping of articular
cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3T MRI. Osteoarthr Cartilage.
2007; 15:789-797.
3. Sierra
A, Michaeli S, Niskanen JP, et al. Water spin dynamics during apoptotic cell
death in glioma gene therapy probed by T1rho and T2rho. Magn Reson Med. 2008;
59:1311-1319.
4. Kettunen
MI, Sierra A, Narvainen MJ, et al. Low spin-lock field T1 relaxation in the
rotating frame as a sensitive MR imaging marker for gene therapy treatment
response in rat glioma. Radiology. 2007; 243:796-803.
5. Virta
A, Komu M, Kormano M. T1rho of protein solutions at very low fields: dependence
on molecular weight, concentration, and structure. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37:53-57.
6. Morita
K, Matsuzawa H, Fujii Y, Tanaka R, Kwee IL, Nakada T. Diffusion tensor analysis
of peritumoral edema using lambda chart analysis indicative of the heterogeneity
of the microstructure within edema. J Neurosurg. 2005; 102:336-341.