Ece Bayram1, Karthik Sreenivasan1, Jason Longhurst1, Sarah Banks2, Zhengshi Yang1, Xiaowei Zhuang1, Dietmar Cordes1, Aaron Ritter1, Jessica Caldwell1, Brent Bluett3, and Virendra Mishra1
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States, 3Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
This study investigated striatal functional
connectivity correlates of dual-tasking in Parkinson’s disease with and without
mild cognitive impairment using resting state fMRI. Increased caudate
functional connectivity with frontotemporal, insular and subcortical regions
were associated with increased dual task
cost in Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive impairment, whereas
correlations were only seen in increased putamen and supplementary motor area
functional connectivity and increased dual task cost in PD participants. These
results reveal that dual tasking is associated with different striatal
functional connectivity patterns in PD participants, with and without,
cognitive impairment suggesting compensatory mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease
with mild cognitive impairment.
Introduction
Attention and executive functions play a key role in gait in Parkinson’s disease (PD) 1. Gait impairment in PD differs between patients with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In particular, gait parameters with high sensitivity to dual task were shown to be associated with PD-MCI 2. In PD, while striatal activity was observed during dual tasking, no striatal activity was observed during cognitive or motor tasks 3. This region was also not recruited by healthy controls during dual tasking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the neural correlates of dual tasking in PD-MCI and PD with normal cognition (PD-NC) focusing on striatal functional connectivity (FC) as different FC patterns may be associated with dual tasking in PD-MCI due to cognitive deficits.Methods
Sixteen PD-MCI 4 and 16 PD-NC from the Center for Neurodegeneration and Translational Neuroscience at Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health were included. To eliminate the medication effect, all testing and scanning were performed during levodopa off (>12 hours after the last levodopa dose). Demographics and disease parameters are shown in Table 1. Dual Task Timed Up and GO (TUG) was used to assess dual task interference. For the single task condition (TUG), participants are required to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn, walk back and sit down. In the dual task condition (TUG-cognitive), participants are required to complete the same test while counting backwards by threes from a randomly selected number. The outcome measure is the time a participant takes to perform each test. Dual task cost (DTC) (%) was calculated to normalize for single task performance as: (dual task – single task)/single task *100 5. Increased DTC is indicated with a higher percentage. All participants underwent resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging with a 3 T scanner. After standard preprocessing, mean time series were obtained from 38 regions-of-interest (ROIs) likely to be involved in dual tasking based on Vervoort et al. 6. The subcortical ROIs were; putamen, caudate, substantia nigra pars compacta, subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus, thalamus and pedunculopontine nucleus. The cortical ROIs were; primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, presupplementary motor area, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus, precuneus, posterior cingulate, anterior cingulate and insula. The connectivity between two ROIs was estimated using Pearson’s correlation between their averaged time-series, and subsequently a connectivity matrix (38 x 38) was obtained for each subject. Two groups were compared for TUG performances and DTC using Mann Whitney U test. Correlation analyses between striatal FC values and DTC were computed separately for each group using Spearman’s correlation.Results
Age, gender, years of education, disease
severity assessed by Hoehn and Yahr stage, and motor impairment assessed by
Movement Disorders Society- Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III
did not differ between groups (Table 1). TUG and TUG-cognitive performances
were different between groups, with no significant DTC difference (Table 2).
The PD-MCI group was significantly slower than PD-NC during both TUG and
TUG-cognitive tasks. For the PD-MCI, DTC was positively correlated with FC
between left caudate-right insula (r=.532, p=0.034) and right superior temporal
gyrus (r=.562, p=.024) (Figure 1); right caudate- right dorsolateral prefrontal
cortex (r=.562, p=.024), right globus pallidus (r=.588, p=.017), right insula
(r=.574, p=.020), right superior temporal gyrus (r=.641, p=.007), right
thalamus (r=.594, p=.015) (Figure 2). For the PD-NC, DTC was positively
correlated with only right putamen and right supplementary motor area FC (r=.565,
p=.023) (Figure 3).Discussion
Our results revealed that performance on dual
tasking, incorporating both gait and cognitive performance, correlates with
different striatal FC patterns in PD-MCI. Higher DTC was associated with increases
in different striatal connections in these two groups. In PD-MCI, DTC was
associated with caudate FC with frontotemporal, insular and subcortical regions;
whereas in PD-NC the only correlation between DTC and FC was seen in putamen
and supplementary motor area. Different correlates within these two groups point
to compensatory mechanisms in PD-MCI, as DTC between the groups were not
different. As significant correlations were scarce, dual-tasking is likely
associated with other regions in addition to striatum.Conclusion
Striatal FC correlates of dual-tasking are
different between PD-MCI and PD-NC. As underlying mechanisms differ, these two
groups may respond differently to therapies targeting gait impairment and
cognition. Future studies should determine the effects of common therapies on
dual-tasking in PD-MCI and PD-NC. On the other hand, future studies
investigating associations between connectivity of other cortical and
subcortical regions not included in our study can help elucidate the neural
correlates of dual-tasking in PD-MCI.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the
National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of
Health under grant number 5P20GM109025, and private grant funds from Peter and Angela Dal Pezzo.References
- Yogev G, Giladi N, Peretz C, Springer S, Simon ES, Hausdorff
JM. Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: Which aspects of
gait are attention demanding? Eur J Neurosci. 2005.
doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04298.x.
-
Amboni M, Barone P, Iuppariello
L, et al. Gait Patterns in Parkinsonian Patients With or Without Mild Cognitive
Impairment. doi:10.1002/mds.25165.
-
Nieuwhof F, Bloem BR,
Reelick MF, et al. Impaired dual tasking in Parkinson’s disease is associated
with reduced focusing of cortico-striatal activity. Brain.
2017;140(5):1384-1398. doi:10.1093/brain/awx042.
-
Litvan I, Goldman JG,
Tröster AI, et al. Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment in
Parkinson’s disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force guidelines. Mov Disord.
2012;27(3):349-356. doi:10.1002/mds.24893.
-
McDowd JM. The effects of
age and extended practice on divided attention performance. J Gerontol.
1986;41(6):764-769. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3772053. Accessed
November 4, 2018.
-
Vervoort G, Leunissen I,
Firbank M, et al. Structural brain alterations in motor subtypes of Parkinson’s
disease: Evidence from probabilistic tractography and shape analysis. PLoS
One. 2016;11(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157743.