Valeria Elisa Contarino1,2, Giorgio Conte1, Claudia Morelli2, Sonia Francesca Calloni1, Luis Carlos Sanmiguel Serpa3, Elisa Scola1, Francesca Trogu2, Vincenzo Silani2,4, and Fabio Triulzi1,4
1Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy, 2Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italy, 3Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy, 4Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
Synopsis
The
diagnosis of Motor Neuron Disease (MND) is a long process that
involves careful clinical and neurological examination during a long
period of time. As iron overload is recognized as one of the main
pathogenic mechanisms, previous studies focused on hand-drawn
ROI-based measures of susceptibility in the precentral gyrus in MND.
In contrast to the manually drawn ROIs approach guided by pathology
localization and lateralization, this study suggests that the
building of a MND biomarker might rely on susceptibility properties
of the precentral gyrus measured on clinical images with a
fully-automatic pipeline.
Introduction
Motor Neuron
Disease (MND) is
a group of neurodegenerative disorders primarily affecting motor
neurons. MND exhibits
different phenotypes
and can present with a
widely variable involvement of upper and lower motor neurons.
Moreover, regional variants restricted to the arms, legs or bulbar
region as well as different patterns of clinical expression (distal
or proximal, symmetric or asymmetric) are well-known [1]. Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is the most common MND and is characterized
by degeneration of both upper
and lower motor neurons.
Precentral gyrus susceptibility changes have been
investigated in ALS with T2*-weighed imaging, Susceptibility-weighted
imaging (SWI) and Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) based
on hand-drawn ROIs and/or
visual inspection [2,3,4]. Susceptibility increase is observed in
both cortex and subcortical white matter probably
due to iron overload and myelin content decrease respectively.
However, hand-drawn ROIs-based measures and visual inspection-based
scoring are strongly
user-dependent and time
consuming.
We developed and applied a
fully-automatic image processing pipeline to investigate the
susceptibility properties of the precentral gyrus in MND. Methods
51 MND (61.21 ±9.63
y) and 25 Healthy Controls (HC, 57.32 ±7.30 y) were enrolled and
scanned at IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano-San Luca Hospital,
Milan (Italy). A 3D sagittal FSPGR BRAVO T1w (TR=8.7ms, TE=3.2ms,
TI=450ms; Pixel 0.5x0.5mm,
thickness=1mm, spacing=1mm, FA=12°,
matrix 256x256) and a spoiled gradient-echo multiecho (TR=39ms, 7
equally spaced echoes centered at 24ms, Pixel 0.47x0.47mm,
thickness=1.4mm,
spacing=0.7mm, FA=20°,
matrix 416x320) whole-brain sequences were acquired at 3T General
Electric (GE) SIGNA unit.
Images
were visually assessed and processed at Neuroradiology Deparment
of Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan
(Italy). FSL Brain Extraction Tool provided the brain mask from
magnitude image. Phase image and mask image were used to calculate
the QSM by using the Matlab toolbox STI Suite [5]. Streaking
artifacts reduction (STAR) QSM algorithm was
adopted [6]. QSM was
coregistered to
T1w image with
a mutual information-based rigid transformation in SPM12 and
automatic
segmentation
of
brain regions was
performed in Freesurfer
(Fig.1). Precentral
gyrus cortex (PreGC) and subcortical white matter (PreGSubcWM) ROIs
were
extracted
(Fig.2). Mean susceptibility and skewness of the susceptibility
distribution were calculated in the PreGC and PreCSubcWM ROIs and
statistically analyzed in
SPSS. Results
In PreGC,
mean susceptibility was higher in MND but not statistically different
from HC (p=0.139) while skewness was statistically significantly
higher (p=0.002) in MND compared to HC. In PreGSubcWM,
mean susceptibility (p=0.005) and skewness (p=0.039) were
significantly higher in MND compared to HC. Mean susceptibility in
PreGSubcWM
showed a significant
correlation with disease duration (Sig=0.033, r=0.26) and ALS
Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS,
Sig=0.026, r=−0.42). Discussion
The
automatic ROI-based approach allows to obtain measurements that are
irrespective of both pathology
localization and lateralization. Automatic
ROIs
are
not guided
by the pathological changes occuring in precentral gyrus in MND
patients that on the contrary may influence the ROI manual drawing.
The hand drawn ROI-based
approach is time consuming, user-dependent and difficult to perform
due to the small size of the target structure leading to poor measure
reproducibility.
On the other hand, the metric of
susceptibility mean calculated on this large automatic cortical ROI
may lose significance: the values of the voxels with increased
susceptibility are indeed averaged with all the other voxels
compounding the bilateral PreGC. In addition, cortical voxels largely
suffer from partial volume effects especially in standard resolution
scans. On the contrary, skewness of susceptibility distribution in
PreGC is sensitive to susceptibility changes in MND measured on the
automatically-segmented bilateral PreGC.
In PreGSubcWM, which is less affected
by partial volume effects, automatically-measured mean susceptibility
is able to highlight white matter anomalies likely linked to
degeneration of myelinated fibers.
The diagnosis of MND is a long process
and there is no single definitive test, the process involves careful
clinical and neurological examination during a long period of time
[7]. An automatic non-invasive tool able to characterize the
precentral gyrus with
quantification of
susceptibility properties of
cortex and subcortical white
matter would be beneficial in building a biomarker of pathology in
MND. Conclusion
For the first time, a fully-automatic
pipeline have been applied to quantitatively
study the susceptibility
properties of the precentral gyrus in MND. Our study suggests that
the building of a MND biomarker might
rely on susceptibility skewness in PreGC and susceptibility mean in
PreGSubcWM automatically measured on clinical images.
The
pipeline may
be easily adapted to widen
the measurements
pool and be
applied
on other neurodegenerative disorders.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Jeffrey M. Statland, Richard J.
Barohn, April L. McVey, Jonathan Katz, Mazen M. Dimachkie. Patterns
of Weakness, Classification of Motor Neuron Disease & Clinical
Diagnosis of Sporadic ALS Neurol Clin. 2015 Nov; 33(4): 735–748.
[2]
Donatelli G, Retico A, Caldarazzo Ienco E, Cecchi P, Costagli M,
Frosini D, Biagi L, Tosetti M, Siciliano G, Cosottini M.
Semiautomated Evaluation of the Primary Motor Cortex in Patients with
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018
Jan;39(1):63-69.
[3]
Vázquez-Costa JF, Mazón M, Carreres-Polo J, Hervás D, Pérez-Tur
J, Martí-Bonmatí L, Sevilla T. Brain signal intensity changes as
biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018
Feb;137(2):262-271.
[4]
Costagli M, Donatelli G, Biagi L, Caldarazzo Ienco E, Siciliano G,
Tosetti M, Cosottini M. Magnetic susceptibility in the deep layers of
the primary motor cortex in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neuroimage
Clin. 2016 May 2;12:965-969.
[5]
Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, Xiao X, Liu C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase
unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative
susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2014 Feb;27(2):219-27.
[6]
Wei H, Dibb R, Zhou Y, Sun Y, Xu J, Wang N, Liu C. Streaking artifact
reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with
large dynamic range. NMR Biomed. 2015 Oct;28(10):1294-303.
[7]
Simon NG, Huynh W, Vucic S, Talbot K, Kiernan MC. Motor neuron
disease: current management and future prospects. Intern Med J. 2015
Oct;45(10):1005-13.