To identify relationships between Parkinson’s disease (PD) severity and microstructural changes in white matter (WM), we applied a multimodal data-fusion method known as linked independent component analysis (LICA) to a set of diffusion magnetic resonance (MR) and myelin-sensitive imaging data. LICA explained data variance with high sensitivity to PD severity, revealing widespread coordinated decreases in intracellular volume fraction, fractional anisotropy, and myelin volume fraction with increases in radial diffusivity. Our results show coordinated microstructural alterations in WM with disease severity and PD progression.
Participants: We recruited 26 healthy controls (HCs), 25 patients with early PD at Hoehn & Yahr stages 1–2, and 32 with late PD at Hoehn & Yahr stages 3–4.
Image acquisition: All subjects were scanned using a 3T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare). Scans were performed using multi-shell diffusion MRI with b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2, and data were acquired along 64 isotropic diffusion gradient directions. MTsat indices were calculated using three-dimensional multi-echo fast low-angle shot sequences with predominant T1-, proton density-, and MT-weighting.
Diffusion MRI and myelin-sensitive imaging: Diffusion-weighted data were fitted to the Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) model,(8) and the NODDI Matlab Toolbox5 was used to generate maps of intracellular volume fractions (ICVF) and orientation dispersion indices. Diffusion-weighted data were also processed using the Diffusional Kurtosis Estimator(9) to generate maps of mean kurtosis, axial kurtosis, and radial kurtosis. Classic diffusion tensor maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity (RD) were estimated from the diffusion-weighted images based on standard formulas,(10) with b=0 and 1,000 s/mm2. To calculate myelin volume fractions (MVF), MTsat data were analyzed using an in-house MATLAB script as described previously.(11) All diffusion parameters and MVF maps were projected onto mean FA skeletons that were generated using a standard protocol for tract-based spatial statistics.(12)
LICA: Skeletonized parameter maps were included in LICA-driven decompositions using FMRIB’s {3.1 LICA (FLICA, http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FLICA) to model inter-subject variability across ten metrics (7) (Fig. 1).
Statistical
tests: Diagnostic group differences (HCs, early PDs, and late
PDs) were associated with the LICA components subject loading, age, and sex using
a general linear model with Bonferroni family-wise error rate correction. Associations
were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05.
1. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):896-912. 2.
2. Andica C, Kamagata K, Hatano T, Okuzumi A, Saito A, Nakazawa M, et al. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the nigrostriatal pathway in Parkinson's disease: Retrograde degeneration observed by tract-profile analysis. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2018;51:55-60.
3. Kamagata K, Motoi Y, Abe O, Shimoji K, Hori M, Nakanishi A, et al. White matter alteration of the cingulum in Parkinson disease with and without dementia: evaluation by diffusion tensor tract-specific analysis. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology. 2012;33(5):890-5.
4. Kamagata K, Motoi Y, Tomiyama H, Abe O, Ito K, Shimoji K, et al. Relationship between cognitive impairment and white-matter alteration in Parkinson's disease with dementia: tract-based spatial statistics and tract-specific analysis. European radiology. 2013;23(7):1946-55.
5. Kamagata K, Tomiyama H, Hatano T, Motoi Y, Abe O, Shimoji K, et al. A preliminary diffusional kurtosis imaging study of Parkinson disease: comparison with conventional diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(3):251-8.
6. Kamagata K, Tomiyama H, Motoi Y, Kano M, Abe O, Ito K, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging of cingulate fibers in Parkinson disease: comparison with conventional diffusion tensor imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2013;31(9):1501-6.
7. Groves AR, Smith SM, Fjell AM, Tamnes CK, Walhovd KB, Douaud G, et al. Benefits of multi-modal fusion analysis on a large-scale dataset: life-span patterns of inter-subject variability in cortical morphometry and white matter microstructure. NeuroImage. 2012;63(1):365-80.
8. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage. 2012;61(4):1000-16.
9. Tabesh A, Jensen JH, Ardekani BA, Helpern JA. Estimation of tensors and tensor-derived measures in diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2011;65(3):823-36.
10. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. Journal of magnetic resonance Series B. 1994;103(3):247-54.
11. Helms G, Dathe H, Kallenberg K, Dechent P. High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2008;60(6):1396-407.
12. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage. 2006;31(4):1487-505.
13. Braak H, Del Tredici K. Invited Article: Nervous system pathology in sporadic Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2008;70(20):1916-25.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of LICA analyses.
Linked LICA was used in the flat configuration with all ten modalities linked only by the shared subject loading matrix “H.” The outputs of LICA (components) are defined by “H” and by spatial patterns.