Lyn Kamintsky1, Kathleen A Cairns2, Ronel Veksler3, Chris Bowen1, Steven D Beyea1, Alon Friedman1, and Cynthia Calkin1
1Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada, 3Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
Synopsis
This study addresses
the need for mechanism-based understanding and diagnosis of bipolar depression.
Using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI we identified extensive blood-brain barrier
(BBB) leakage in 28% of bipolar patients (and zero controls). All
bipolar patients with extensive BBB leakage also had
insulin resistance and worse metabolic, psychiatric and cognitive symptoms. We found depression to be associated with
region-specific BBB leakage, with the nucleus accumbens best predicting
depression severity. Our findings highlight BBB damage as a mechanism
contributing to the dysfunction of depression-associated brain regions, and suggest
that insulin resistance increases the risk of extensive BBB leakage.
Introduction
Dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) has been
suggested as an effective tool for assessing blood-brain barrier (BBB)
dysfunction in many brain disorders including epilepsy, tumors, stroke, traumatic
brain injury and dementia. While BBB leakage is hypothesized to underlie the
neuropsychiatric complications of these disorders1, the link between BBB leakage and
neuropsychiatric symptoms remains unclear. Here we set out to provide the first characterization of BBB
permeability in bipolar depression, and to examine whether the affected brain regions reflect clinical
symptomatology.Methods
We studied the BBB
of 36 bipolar patients and 14 controls (matched for sex and
age), using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Participants were
intravenously injected with the magnetic contrast agent gadoteridol
(0.1 mmol/kg, ProHance, Bracco Imaging Canada, Montreal, QC), and its
dynamics in the brain were monitored for a period of 20 minutes using T1-weighted
MRI (3T GE Discovery MR750). All participants also underwent diagnostic interviews, cognitive testing,
anthropometric measurements and blood sampling. MRI analysis was
performed as previously described2–4.
In brief, the accumulation rate of the contrast agent during the slow
enhancement period of the scan (6-20 min) was derived for each voxel as a
measure of BBB leakage. To identify voxels with elevated versus nominal
permeability, an intensity threshold was applied (established as the 95th
percentile of values in a previously scanned cohort of control subjects5).
The percent of voxels with elevated permeability was used to reflect the extent
of BBB leakage in each subject. Blinded clustering (K-means) was used to
identify subjects with extensive BBB leakage. Generalized linear model-based
feed-forward selection was applied to identify brain regions most predictive of
depression severity. Classification accuracy was assessed using receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The Chi square test and Wilcoxon rank
sum test were used for statistical comparisons of categorical and continuous clinical
parameters, respectively. Results
We identified extensive BBB leakage
in 28% of bipolar patients and zero age/sex-matched controls (P<0.05, Chi
square). Notably, all bipolar patients
with extensive leakage also had
insulin resistance and worse psychiatric, cognitive and functional outcomes (p<0.05). We found depression to be
associated with region-specific BBB leakage, with the nucleus accumbens best
predicting depression severity. Discussion
Our findings highlight BBB damage as a mechanism
contributing to the dysfunction of key brain regions associated with
depression. Our results further suggest that insulin resistance increases the
risk of extensive BBB leakage and the associated exacerbation of
neuropsychiatric symptoms. Conclusion
The described imaging
approach is the first to identify a specific brain pathology in bipolar patients,
and may therefore allow biomarker-based distinction between mood disorders.
Moreover, the approach allows quantitative and objective diagnosis of
region-specific BBB dysfunction, and the study of associated clinical
manifestations. We thus assert that our approach may be useful for the
diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of mood disorders, potentially leading to more
informed treatment decisions. Acknowledgements
This study was supported
by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/EPITARGET), the Nova
Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF), Canadian Institute for Health
Research (CIHR), and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD).References
1. Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Med. 2013;19(12):1584-1596. doi:10.1038/nm.3407.
2. Veksler R, Shelef I, Friedman A. Blood-brain barrier imaging in human neuropathologies. Arch Med Res. 2014;45(8):646-652.
3. Chassidim Y, Veksler R, Lublinsky S, Pell GS, Friedman A, Shelef I. Quantitative imaging assessment of blood-brain barrier permeability in humans. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2013;10(1):9. doi:10.1186/2045-8118-10-9.
4. Weissberg I, Veksler R, Kamintsky L, et al. Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction in football players. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(11). doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.2682.