This study aims to improve 1H CSI data quality, by presenting a novel method for correction of B0 instability (0.9 Hz/min drift) due to gradient system heating produced by application of DTI and fMRI sequences. The method tracks magnetic field drift using three reference lines in the 1H CSI data, which allow misaligned spectral data to be corrected in post-processing. This novel method may be combined with any spectroscopic technique that employs water suppression. Both phantom and in vivo data are presented, to demonstrate improved SNR and spectrum quality, with minimal influence on metabolite data acquisition or added cost.
Proton (1H) Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is an informative non-invasive method for in-vivo tissue characterization. Over the last three decades, MRS has been increasingly applied to the study of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. In practice, MRS sequences such as Point Resolved Spectroscopy (PRESS), Free Induction Decay (FID) and spin-echo (SE) chemical shift imaging (CSI) are often applied sequentially, along with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Application of high speed MRI sequences such as DTI and multi-echo BOLD imaging may cause mechanical vibration of the gradient system, increasing the gradient system temperature. In turn, this may induce magnetic field drift, which decreases the quality of MRS data.
During MRS acquisitions from the CNS, due to relatively low in-vivo metabolite concentrations, multiple spectroscopic signals are acquired and averaged, to improve signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). However, temporally varying B0 magnetic fields will degrade the SNR of averaged signals due to misalignment of metabolite peaks. The quality of single voxel PRESS data suffering from B0 magnetic field drift can be improved using post-processing procedures [1]. However, B0 field drift correction of CSI data is challenging, due to application of phase-encoding gradients. Researchers have addressed this issue by acquiring additional reference water spectra, for use in B0 drift correction of CSI data [2]. However, this approach extends acquisition time, thereby limiting its use in applications requiring shorter repetition times. Therefore, we propose a novel B0 field drift tracking method that does not require acquisition of additional reference spectra, with minimal impact on the measurement of MRS metabolites.
Fig. 1 illustrates a B0 drift tracked sequence diagram with three reference lines for each acquisition. This design utilizes the intact non-selective, unsuppressed water signal to maximize the signal intensity of reference echoes from the whole brain. Frequency drift is computed according to the phase difference of reference line 1 and line 3: $$$ f=\sum_iw_{i}\frac{\phi_{3i}-\phi_{1i}}{2\pi*2*echospace}$$$, where the phase difference of reference line 3 ($$$\phi_{3i}$$$) and line 1 ($$$\phi_{1i}$$$) is divided by two times echospace time, $$$\omega_{i}$$$ is the i-th voxel intensity weight factor and $$$f$$$ is the frequency drift.
All studies were performed on a 3 T Siemens Prisma Scanner. 1H spectra were acquired using modified CSI SE and CSI FID pulse sequences. To illustrate how the proposed method works, phantom data was acquired using a 3D CSI SE sequence with TR/TE 2000/30 ms, 36 average, voxel size 12.5×12.5×12.5 mm, and echospace 1.58 ms.
In addition, to demonstrate how long the B0 drift lasts following a multi-echo BOLD sequence, we collected serial data sets using 3D CSI FID sequence with acquisition parameters: TR/TE 3000/2.3 ms, 23 average, voxel size 2.5×2.5×2.5 cm3, and echospace 0.88 ms. Three phantom data sets were collected at 0, 30, and 60 min after multi-echo BOLD sequence, respectively. B0 drift frequency curves are demonstrated in Fig 3. Drift frequency is filtered by low pass filter to remove variation from noise. To examine the performance of the proposed method for in-vivo brain study, a volunteer was scanned to acquire 2D CSI SE data with TR/TE 2000/30 ms, 14 average, voxel size 12.5x12.5x25 mm3, and echospace 1.58 ms.
[1] Rowland BC et al. J Neuroimaging 2017; 27(1):23-28.
[2] Tal and Gonen. Magn Reson Med 2013; 70(4):895-904.