Using a TrueFISP sequence we implemented a non-invasive assay for stage classification of bladder tumors using a orthotopic murine bladder cancer model. Because generation of this tumor model is achieved by administration of carcinogenic agents it is naturally heterogeneous. The imaging method proposed allows accurate assessment of tumor burden and provides a tool for randomization to experimental treatments.
All experimental procedures involving animals complied with Northwestern’s IACUC guidelines. Bladder tumors were induced in male C57/B6 mice at least 6 weeks old following administration of N-nitrosobutyl(4-hydroxybutyl)amine (BBN) at a dose of 0.05% in drinking water, provided ad libitum 10 . All mice underwent MRI at 16 weeks post-start of BBN administration and were euthanized at 20 weeks. Histopathology and ex vivo bladder weights (BW) were recorded and compared to MRI. Prior to scanning (~10 minutes) and to improve anatomical evaluation of the bladder (i.e. full and “stretched” bladder) each mouse was injected with a sub-cutaneous dose of 0.1-0.2 ml of warm saline solution. Animals were scanned under anesthesia on a 7T MRI ClinScan (Bruker). A quadrature body coil was used for excitation with a 4-channel phased array for reception placed on the lower abdomen. This coil choice and positioning enabled optimized acquisition of whole bladder images. Rapid multi-directional sets of bladder MR images were acquired in the shortest time possible with high diagnostic quality (i.e. high signal-to-noise) using fast imaging with steady state precession technique (true FISP) (TR=900 msec, TE=2 msec, FA=70, 14 averages) providing T1/T2 weighting in <10 minutes per mouse. Total time from start to end was ~15 minutes/mouse. Images were analyzed using Jim7 (Xinapse). One slice located at the center of the bladder was chosen and two regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn, one around the outer edge of the bladder and one over its lumen (see Figure 1). The bladder lumen area (BLA) was then subtracted from the outer bladder area (OBA) and the resulting surface quantity labelled ΔOBA-BLA was considered directly proportional to bladder wall thickness. The underlying hypothesis being that an increase in bladder wall thickness (i.e. an increase in ΔOBA-BLA ) reflects progression of tumor. 3D-rendering of segmented bladder wall was also generated in some cases for enhanced visualization of bladder abnormalities. Tumor stage was determined for each mouse based on the degree of invasiveness and metastasis and through histopathological evaluation (data not shown). Non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma is designated as stage Ta, while stages T1, T2, T3 and T4 refer to invasion into the subepithelial connective tissue, muscle, perivescical tissue and adjacent organs, respectively11
1. Rosenberg, J. E., Hoffman-Censits, J., Powles, T. et al.: Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet, 387: 1909, 2016
2 . Sharma, P., Callahan, M. K., Bono, P. et al.: Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, two-stage, multi-arm, phase 1/2 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 17: 1590, 2016
3. Bellmunt, J., de Wit, R., Vaughn, D. J. et al.: Pembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med, 2017
4. Chan, E., Patel, A., Heston, W. et al.: Mouse orthotopic models for bladder cancer research. BJU Int, 104: 1286, 2009
5. Zhang, N., Li, D., Shao, J. et al.: Animal models for bladder cancer: The model establishment and evaluation (Review). Oncol Lett, 9: 1515, 2015
6. Patel, A. R., Chan, E. S., Hansel, D. E. et al.: Transabdominal micro-ultrasound imaging of bladder cancer in a mouse model: a validation study. Urology, 75: 799, 2010
7. Chin, J., Kadhim, S., Garcia, B. et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging for detecting and treatment monitoring of orthotopic murine bladder tumor implants. J Urol, 145: 1297, 1991
8. Jurczok, A., Fornara, P., Soling, A.: Bioluminescence imaging to monitor bladder cancer cell adhesion in vivo: a new approach to optimize a syngeneic, orthotopic, murine bladder cancer model. BJU Int, 101: 120, 2008
9. Vandeveer, A. J., Fallon, J. K., Tighe, R. et al.: Systemic Immunotherapy of Non-Muscle Invasive Mouse Bladder Cancer with Avelumab, an Anti-PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor. Cancer Immunol Res, 4: 452, 2016
10. Zitvogel, L., Pitt, J. M., Daillere, R. et al.: Mouse models in oncoimmunology. Nat Rev Cancer, 2016
11. Lutzeyer W, Rubben H, Dahm H. Prognostic parameters in superficial bladder cancer: an analysis of 315 cases. J Urol 1982;127:250–2. [PubMed: 7062375]
Fig 2.TrueFISP MR images of bladder and the corresponding 3D rendered visualization are shown for (A.B.C.D) control no-tumor mouse and (G.H.I.J.) bladder tumor mouse. Shown in red in (B) and (H) are the outlines used for generating 3D surfaces for each mouse. Low-power (2.5x) and high power (10x) images of bladder sections are shown for mouse with (E.F) no-tumor and for mouse with (K.L.)