Patient-derived xenografts in NSG mice provide a novel and more clinically relevant model of studying breast cancer brain metastasis in comparison to traditional cell lines in nude mice. NSG and nude mice both received brain-seeking breast cancer cells and were imaged with MRI to assess cell arrest, retention, and growth. Images revealed significantly more brain metastases and overall whole-body tumour burden in NSG mice than nudes. These results provide characterization of the NSG mouse as a preclinical platform for PDX models and demonstrates the importance of imaging to establish this model for future advancements in drug development and personalized medicine.
1. Cheng, X., & Hung, M. C. (2007). Breast cancer brain metastases. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 26(3-4), 635-643.
2. Crivellari, D., Pagani, O., Veronesi, A., Lombardi, D., Nole, F., Th¨ rlimann, B., ... & Graffeo, R. (2001). High incidence of central nervous system involvement in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer treated with epirubicin and docetaxel. Annals of oncology, 12(3), 353-356.
3. Heyn, C., Ronald, J. A., Ramadan, S. S., Snir, J. A., Barry, A. M., MacKenzie, L. T., ... & Yoneda, T. (2006). In vivo MRI of cancer cell fate at the singleācell level in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 56(5), 1001-1010.
4. Perera, M., Ribot, E. J., Percy, D. B., McFadden, C., Simedrea, C., Palmieri, D., ... & Foster, P. J. (2012). In vivo magnetic resonance imaging for investigating the development and distribution of experimental brain metastases due to breast cancer. Translational oncology, 5(3), 217-225.
5. Percy, D. B., Ribot, E. J., Chen, Y., McFadden, C., Simedrea, C., Steeg, P. S., ... & Foster, P. J. (2011). In vivo characterization of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach. Investigative radiology, 46(11), 718-725.
6. Hidalgo, M., Amant, F., Biankin, A. V., Budinská, E., Byrne, A. T., Caldas, C., ... & Roman-Roman, S. (2014). Patient-derived xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational cancer research. Cancer discovery, 4(9), 998-1013.
7. Zhang, X., Claerhout, S., Pratt, A., Dobrolecki, L. E., Petrovic, I., Lai, Q., ... & Wong, H. (2013). A renewable tissue resource of phenotypically stable, biologically and ethnically diverse, patient-derived human breast cancer xenograft models. Cancer research.
8. Cassidy, J. W., Caldas, C., & Bruna, A. (2015). Maintaining tumor heterogeneity in patient-derived tumor xenografts. Cancer research, 75(15), 2963-2968.
9. DeRose, Y. S., Wang, G., Lin, Y. C., Bernard, P. S., Buys, S. S., Ebbert, M. T., ... & Neumayer, L. (2011). Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nature medicine, 17(11), 1514.
10. Landis, M. D., Lehmann, B. D., Pietenpol, J. A., & Chang, J. C. (2013). Patient-derived breast tumor xenografts facilitating personalized cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Research, 15(1), 1.
11. Reyal, F., Guyader, C., Decraene, C., Lucchesi, C., Auger, N., Assayag, F., ... & De Cremoux, P. (2012). Molecular profiling of patient-derived breast cancer xenografts. Breast cancer research, 14(1), R11.
12. Whittle, J. R., Lewis, M. T., Lindeman, G. J., & Visvader, J. E. (2015). Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power. Breast cancer research, 17(1), 17.
13. Zhou, Q., Facciponte, J., Jin, M., Shen, Q., & Lin, Q. (2014). Humanized NOD-SCID IL2rg–/–mice as a preclinical model for cancer research and its potential use for individualized cancer therapies. Cancer letters, 344(1), 13-19.
14. Dobrolecki, L. E., Airhart, S. D., Alferez, D. G., Aparicio, S., Behbod, F., Bentires-Alj, M., ... & Dowst, H. (2016). Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 35(4), 547-573.