Caitlin Tressler1, Kanchan Sonkar1, and Kristine Glunde1,2
1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
We are studying the role of GDPD6 in breast cancer, as well
as its potential as a therapeutic target. GDPD6 silencing experiments showed
decreased invasion and migration in breast cancer cells. There is currently no
small molecule inhibitor for GDPD6. We have identified dipyridamole as
potential GDPD6 inhibitor, which can be used both in the lab and potentially in
the clinic. We are using a combination of 1H MRS and computational
studies to determine how dipyridamole inhibits GDPD6 to evaluate its potential
as an inhibitor and identify other potential small molecule inhibitors of
GDPD6.
Purpose
We have identified GDPD6 as a critical enzyme in the
degradation of glycerophosphocholine (GPC) in choline metabolism, which can be detected
using high-resolution (HR) 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS),
and which is a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. Using siRNA
silencing, we have found a decrease in invasion and migration associated with
the knockdown of GDPD6.1 To date, no small molecule inhibitor is
available to target GDPD6. Having a GDPD6 inhibitor available would be
beneficial for studying the role of GDPD6 in the lab, as well as a potential
therapeutic for use in the clinic. Using computational studies and 1H
HR MRS, we have identified dipyridamole, an FDA approved non-specific
phosphodiesterase inhibitor, as a GDPD6 inhibitor. Methods
The highly metastatic, triple-negative MDA-MB-231 breast
cancer cell line was chosen to determine the effects of dipyridamole, as we
have previously demonstrated that siRNA silencing of GDPD6 in MDA-MB-231 cells
shows an increase in GPC by 1H HR MRS as well as a decrease in
invasion and migration.1 MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 20 µM
dipyridamole prior to dual-phase extraction and 1H HR MRS of the
water-soluble extract fractions. The choline metabolites including GPC, phosphocholine
(PC), choline (Cho), and total choline-containing compounds (tCho, i.e. the sum
of Cho, PC, and GPC) were quantified using previously established methods.2
We have calculated the GPC/tCho ratio for several different time points of
dipyridamole treatment in MDA-MB-231 cells as GDPD6 inhibition should lead to
an increase in GPC levels relative to tCho. We have also identified a homology
model for GDPD6 to determine the active site of GDPD6 and how dipyridamole acts
as an inhibitor for GDPD6 computationally to guide further experiments in
evaluating dipyridamole and related compounds as potential inhibitors for GDPD6.
The human GDPD6 protein sequence (NP_062539.1) was retrieved from the NCBI
database for 3D structure prediction. The 3D structure was predicted using the BioSerf
server, which is a fully automated homology-modeling server.3 SwissDock4
was used to generate a series of potential conformations of dipyridamole
binding. Results
1H HR MRS of choline metabolites, i.e. GPC, PC, Cho,
and tCho (Figure 1A), from dipyridamole treated cells clearly shows an
increased GPC/tCho ratio in MDA-MB-231 cells after 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours of
treatment as compared to control cells treated with DMSO (Figure 1B). These
data are in agreement with our previous findings showing an increase in GPC in
MDA-MB-231 cells in which GDPD6 was silenced with siRNA.1 Our new
data indicate that dipyridamole inhibits GDPD6 activity. To understand the
mechanism of this inhibition and potentially improve upon dipyridamole as an
inhibitor, we have identified a homology model (Figure 2A), which is being used
for docking experiments to determine how dipyridamole, or other potential
inhibitor(s), binds to GDPD6. Some low energy models demonstrate competitive
binding in the predicted active site, with potential interactions with active
site residues (Figure 2B). The lower the energy of a computational binding
model the higher is its likelihood of being a valid prediction for experimental
results.Discussion
We have previously identified GDPD6 as the primary enzyme
responsible for the breakdown of GPC to Cho in choline phospholipid metabolism
of breast cancer cells.1 GDPD6 silencing by siRNA in MDA-MB-231
breast cancer cells resulted in an increase in GPC levels as compared to
control.1 Our new results with dipyridamole are in agreement with
these previous findings, as dipyridamole increased the GPC/tCho ratio in
MDA-MB-231 cells. These data indicate that dipyridamole inhibits GDPD6 activity
in MDA-MB-231 cells. A homology model was developed in order to allow us to
access computational studies to understand the mechanism of inhibition of GDPD6,
which will potentially allow us to improve a small molecule GDPD6 inhibitor based
on dipyridamole, or identify other compounds that could potentially inhibit
GDPD6. Conclusions
GDPD6 has been identified in breast cancer cell lines as the
enzyme primarily responsible for the breakdown of GPC to Cho. We have also
previously demonstrated that siRNA silencing of GDPD6 leads to a decrease in
invasion and migration of MDA-MB-231 cells, however, small molecule inhibitors
are preferable for use in the lab and as potentially translatable therapeutics
in the clinic. We have identified dipyridamole, a commercially available
FDA-approved drug, as a potential non-specific GDPD6 inhibitor, and we are
currently using computational methods to determine how dipyridamole acts as an
inhibitor as well as identify other potential inhibitors. Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the Division of
Cancer Imaging Research in The
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science for their help and support.References
1.
Cao, M. D.,
Cheng, M., Rizwan, A., Jiang, L., Krishnamachary, B., Bhujwalla, Z. M., Bathen,
T. F., Glunde, K. NMR Biomed. 2016;29(8):1098-1107.
2.
Chan KW, Jiang L, Cheng M, Wijnen JP, Liu G,
Huang P, van Zijl PC, McMahon MT, Glunde K. NMR Biomed.
2016 Jun;29(6):806-16.
3.
Buchan DWA, Ward SM, Lobley AE, Nugent TCO,
Bryson K, Jones DT. Protein annotation and modelling servers at university
college london.
4. Grosdidier,
A, Zoete, V, Michielin, O. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(Web Server issue):W270-7.