B0 inhomogeneity leads to dark band artifacts in cardiac MRI, in particular with the use of steady-state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequences. Limited spatial resolution of MRI-derived in vivo B0 maps and, moreover, the lack of population data prevents the systematic analysis of the problem at hand and the development of optimized B0 shim strategies. We used readily available CT images to derive the B0 conditions in the human heart at very high resolution. Calculated cardiac B0 fields showed consistency with MRI-based B0 measurements and local field artifacts concur with typical dark band locations. The approach is expected to enable the development of population-specific B0 shim strategies for the
We demonstrated the consistency of cardiac B0 field distributions calculated from readily available clinical CT images with those specifically measured by MRI. While the subjects in the CT and MRI groups were not identical, similar overall patterns of local field inhomogeneity were found within and across groups. These field terms furthermore concurred with typical locations of dark band artifacts.
Future improvements will consider 1) potential susceptibility differences between various tissue types and bone, 2) cardiac phases, 3) potential dynamic effects, e.g. blood oxygenation levels, and 4) specific populations, e.g. with respect to age, gender, body type and cardiac disease (such as hypertrophic hearts vs. hearts with myocardial thinning). In addition, further validation of the presented B0 simulation technique with high resolution experimental B0 maps is warranted. The derivation of high-resolution B0 conditions from segmented CT images is expected to pave the way for the development of optimized population-specific cardiac B0 shim strategies using both standard clinical and state-of-the-art B0 shim technology.
1. Earls JP, Ho VB, Foo TK, Castillo E, Flamm SD. Cardiac MRI: Recent Progress and Continues Challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16(2):111-127.
2. Ferreira PF, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15(1):41.
3. Atalay MK, Poncelet BP, Kantor HL, Brady TJ, Weisskoff RM. Cardiac Susceptibility Artifacts Arising From the Heart-Lung Interface, Magn Reson Med. 2001;45(2):341–345.
4. Schär M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, Boesiger P. Cardiac SSFP Imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(4):799–806.
5. Kubach MR, Bornstedt A, Hombach V, Merkle N, Schär M, Spiess J, Nienhaus GU, Rasche V. Cardiac phase-specific shimming (CPSS) for SSFP MR cine imaging at 3 T, Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(20):N476-N478.
6. Mattar W, Juchem C, Terekhov M, Schreiber L. Multi-Coil B0 shimming of the Human Heart: A Theoretical Assessment, Proc. ISMRM (2016), p. 1151.
7. Anderson DJ, Dendy JM, Paschal CB. Simulation Study of Susceptibility Gradients Leading to Focal Myocardial Signal Loss. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(6):1402-8.
8. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996;23(6):815-850.
9. Juchem C, Herman P, Sanganahalli BG, Brown PB, McIntyre S, Nixon TW, Green D, Hyder F, de Graaf RA. DYNAmic Multi-coIl TEchnique (DYNAMITE) shimming of the rat brain at 11.7T. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(8):897-906.
10. Juchem C. B0DETOX - B0 Detoxification Software for Magnetic Field Shimming. Columbia TechVenture (CTV), License CU17326. http://innovation.columbia.edu/technologies/cu17326_b0detox (2017).
11. Marques JP, Bowtell R. Application of a Fourier-Based Method for Rapid Calculation of Field Inhomogeneity Due to Spatial Variation of Magnetic Susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson, 2005;25B(1):65-78.
12. Salomir R, Denis de Senneville B, Moonen CTW. A Fast Calculation Method for Magnetic Field Inhomogeneity due to an Arbitrary Distribution of Bulk Susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson, 2003;19B(1):26-34.
13. Schreiber WG, Schmitt M, Kalden P, Mohrs OK, Kreitner KF, Thelen M. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Saturation-Prepared TrueFISP. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16(6):641-652.
Figure 2. 3D simulation of susceptibility-induced B0 conditions in the human body at 3T. A) Coronal slice of a thoracic CT image. B) Susceptibility differences between air-filled lungs and tissue (including bone) lead to complex B0 variations throughout the body. C) Particularly strong and localized terms are observed at complex-shaped susceptibility boundaries including the tip of the lungs.
Figure 3. Automated 3D heart segmentation based on standard thoracic CT images. A) Axial slice of the original CT image. B) Segmented lung in the axial orientation. C) Segmented 3D heart as region-of-interest for further analysis (left-front view).