Davide Piccini1,2,3, Lorenzo Di Sopra2, Jérôme Yerly2,4, Gabriella Vincenti5, Tobias Rutz5, Juerg Schwitter5, and Matthias Stuber2,4
1Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare AG, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland, 3LTS5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Division of Cardiology and Cardiac MR Center, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
In
cardiac MRI, the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is
based on well-defined protocols and involves a stack of 2D cine images acquired
during multiple breath-holds. This procedure is time-consuming and may result
in suboptimal coverage and inter-slice misregistration. Here, a novel
acquisition protocol for 3D cine imaging with whole-heart coverage in one
single breath-hold with isotropic spatial resolution is described and tested in
10 subjects in comparison to the 2D gold-standard. All 2D datasets and 9/10 3D
datasets were considered adequate for LVEF calculation. Bland-Altman analysis
of LVEF shows good agreement and no bias between the two measurements.
Introduction
Left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a very important measure in cardiology
and is part of nearly every cardiac imaging evaluation as it shows very high
correlation with outcome [1]. In cardiac MRI, the evaluation of LVEF is based
on well-defined protocols and involves a stack of double-oblique 2D short-axis
cine images that are acquired over multiple breath-holds [2,3]. However, this
procedure has several disadvantages. Firstly, the total acquisition time can
easily amount to 10min and is determined by slice positioning, the duration of
data collection, and by the mandatory pauses in-between serial breath-holds.
Secondly, the coverage of the left ventricle (LV) is spatially limited and
offers only an approximate assessment of the base of the heart. Lastly,
multiple breath-holds are often prone to misalignments between adjacent slices,
which may adversely affect the LVEF calculation. To address these limitations,
accelerated 3D cine imaging performed in a single breath-hold has been proposed
in several flavors, from a multi-slice approach [4-7], to volumetric
acquisitions with limited anatomical coverage and anisotropic spatial
resolution [8]. Here, a novel acquisition and reconstruction protocol is
proposed based on a Free-running framework for 3D cine imaging with whole-heart
coverage and isotropic spatial resolution (< 2mm) during one single
breath-hold.
Materials and Methods
Non-triggered
3D cine acquisitions were performed on a clinical 1.5T scanner (MAGNETOM Aera,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in 5 healthy volunteers (3 female, 26±3 years old) and 5 patients (2 female, 44±21 years old) with a modified version of
the prototype sequence described in [9] and using the 3D radial trajectory of
[10]. In volunteers, the protocol was set to a breath-hold duration of 28.5
seconds, in which 8866 radial lines were subdivided into 403 segments of 22
readouts each. In patients, the breath-hold acquisition was performed after
contrast medium injection (0.2mmol/kg Gadobutrol, Gadovist, Bayer Healthcare, Germany) supporting a
reduced acquisition duration of 21 seconds and 6540 acquired radial lines,
subdivided into 327 segments of 20 readouts each. For all 3D acquisitions the
following sequence parameters were used: field-of-view (FOV) (220mm)3,
matrix 1123, isotropic spatial resolution (1.96mm)3,
receiver bandwidth 992 Hz/px, and TE / TR = 1.6/3.2ms. Cine 3D
reconstructions were performed using a similar method to that described in
[11], using the trigger time recorded from the ECG for cardiac binning and with
a temporal resolution of 50ms without view sharing. For gold-standard
comparison, a stack of short axis 2D-cine slices was acquired pre-contrast
during multiple breath-holds with the following sequence parameters: FOV
(300x240)mm, matrix 256x180, in-plane resolution of 1.2x1.2mm, slice thickness
8mm, bandwidth 930Hz/px, and TE/TR = 1.3/3.1ms. Total acquisition and
reconstruction times were recorded. The image quality for function and volume
analysis was visually assessed for both acquisitions. The 3D datasets were then
interpolated and reformatted to match orientation and position of the stack of
2D cine images for quantitative analysis. LVEF was computed for both sets of images using
the Argus VF software (Siemens AG), applying the Simpson rule.
Results
The
acquisitions and reconstructions of all 3D breath-hold volumes were successfully
performed and the average reconstruction time was 25±5 min. Acquisition time for the 2D cine, including localizers, was 11.4±1.4min on average compared to the 21-28s of
the 3D scan. Following visual data inspection, all 2D datasets (n=10) and 9/10
3D data sets were considered adequate for LVEF and LV volume calculation. An
example of 3D patient dataset was reconstructed using all k-lines, before
binning in cardiac phases, to show image quality achieved with the current
amount of undersampling and without compressed sensing (Fig.1). By contrast, an
example showing spatio-temporal resolution and image quality obtained after
compressed sensing reconstruction is shown in Fig.2 and Fig.3 for a volunteer
and a patient, respectively. A comparison between reformatted slices from one subject
is shown in Fig.4. The 3D acquisition yielded a similar LVEF of 62.2±6.4% versus 62.5±3.4% measured by the standard technique (p=0.84). The
Bland-Altman plot for LVEF is displayed in Fig.5 and shows good correlation
with no bias between the two measurements.
Discussion and Conclusions
Initial
evaluation of a proposed 3D cine single breath-hold technique shows a good
quantitative agreement for the evaluation of LVEF in comparison with the
clinical gold standard. Further comparisons of both techniques with the stroke
volume measured by 2D flow as described in [12] are warranted when using the
whole 3D volume for LVEF calculation. Reconstruction weights will also undergo
further optimization to find the best compromise between image quality,
precision, and breath-hold duration. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that
accurate LVEF estimation is feasible using free-running 3D cine MRI acquired in
one single breath-hold, but further steps are needed to fully explore the
clinical utility of this techniqueAcknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Curtis JP, et al. The
association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of
death in stable outpatients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol
2003;42:736–42.
[2] Kramer C, et al. Standardized
cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc
Magn Reson 2013;15:91.
[3] Kilner PJ, et al.
Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital
heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of
Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2010;31:794–805.
[4] Wintersperger BJ, et al. Single breath-hold
real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized
autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm. Eur Radiol.
2003; 13:1931.
[5] Kozerke S, et al. Accelerating cardiac cine 3D
imaging using k‐t BLAST. Magn
Reson Med. 2004; 52: 19-26.
[6] Makowski M, et al. Single
breath-hold assessment of cardiac function using an accelerated 3D single
breath-hold acquisition technique - comparison of an intravascular and
extravascular contrast agent. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012; 14:53.
[7] Jeong D, et al. Single breath hold 3D cardiac cine
MRI using kat-ARC: preliminary results at 1.5T. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;
31:851.
[8] Wetzl J, et al.
Single-breath-hold 3-D CINE imaging of the left ventricle using Cartesian
sampling. Magn Reson Mater Phy Biol Med. 2018;
31:19-31.
[9] Coppo S, et al.
Free-running 4D whole‐heart self‐navigated
golden angle MRI: Initial results. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 74:1306-1316.
[10] Piccini D, et al. Spiral
phyllotaxis: The natural way to construct a 3D radial trajectory in MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2011; 66:1049-1056.
[11] Feng L, et al. 5D whole‐heart sparse MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 79: 826-838.
[12] Vincenti G, et al.
Compressed Sensing Single–Breath-Hold CMR for Fast Quantification of LV
Function, Volumes, and Mass. J Am Coll Cardiol-Imaging. 2014; 7:882-892.