Isao Shiina1, Michinobu Nagao2, Masami Yoneyama3, Kazuo Kodaira1, Yasuhiro Goto1, Yoshihiro Ikeda1, Yutaka Hamatani1, Mamoru Takeyama1, Isao Tanaka1, and Shuji Sakai2
1Department of Radiological Services, Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 3Philips Electronics Japan, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
3 tesla derived MRCA has a limitation of low
contrast for coronary arteries because of setting lower flip angles due to high
SAR. Therefore, the signal contrast of for coronary arteries becomes low. 3D
non-selective balanced TFE (3D nsbTFE) has the possibility to solve this
problem. We examine image quality of MRCA obtained from 3 tesla and 3D nsbTFE.
Synopsis
3
tesla derived MRCA has a limitation of low contrast for coronary arteries because
of setting lower flip angles due to high SAR. Therefore, the signal contrast of
for coronary arteries becomes low. 3D non-selective balanced TFE (3D nsbTFE)
has the possibility to solve this problem. We examine image quality of MRCA
obtained from 3 tesla and 3D nsbTFE.
INTRODUCTION
Coronary MR angiography (MRCA) is widely
used for the assessment of coronary artery disease, and has big merits of no
radiation exposure and unnecessary of contrast media. (REF.1)From the view point of magnetic field strength, 1.5 tesla scanner for
coronary MRA is more used in clinical than 3 tesla scanner because MRCA from balanced
sequence with 1.5 tesla has a good contrast in signal intensity between blood
and myocardium. On the other hand, 3 tesla has to set up lower flip angles for
MRCA due to a limitation of high SAR. Therefore, the signal contrast of for
coronary arteries becomes low (REF.2) if T1TFE sequence is used. Furthermore, MRCA
at 3 tesla has a serious problem of the banding artifacts due to B0 inhomogeneity
(REF.3). 3D non-selective balanced TFE (3D nsbTFE) has the possibility to
solve this problem. 3D nsbTFE enables shorter TR by not using the slice
selective excitation (Fig.1), leading to setting up high flip angles. Therefore,
we hypothesized that 3D nsbTFE can obtain high contrast for coronary arteries
without artifact and less local shimming.Methods
Using 3.0T MR system (Ingenia, Philips Electronics
Japan) and torso-cardiac coil, data of MRCA for 5 healthy volunteers was
analyzed. We compared image quality among three sequences of the conventional
method (TFE), the balanced SSFP combined with T1 TFE (b-TFE), and 3D nsbTFE. Three
sequences were acquired with navigator and cardiac triggering using the
following parameters; TFE, FOV (mm)
= 180×180, slice thickness (mm) = 1.5×1.5×1.5, TR/TE (ms) =3.4/1.51, flip angle (°) = 12, TFE factor = 29,
NSA = 1, SENSE factor = 1×1, Slice = 160, Slice orientation = transverse, 100% gathering time (min) = 5:38; b-TFE, FOV (mm) = 180×180, slice thickness (mm) = 1.5×1.5×1.5, TR/TE (ms) = 4.5/2.2,
flip angle (°) = 70, TFE factor = 22, NSA = 1, SENSE factor = 1×1, Slice = 160, Slice orientation = transverse, 100% gathering time (min) = 8:11;
nsbTFE, FOV (mm) = 280×280, slice thickness (mm) = 1.5×1.5×1.5,
TR/TE (ms) = 2.3/0.93, flip angle (°) = 70, TFE factor=41, NSA=1, C-SENSE
factor=7, Slice=330, Slice orientation = coronal,100% gathering time (min) = 3:04 (Fig.2).
Curved Planer Reconstructions
(CPRs) of MRCA were reconstructed using available software (Ziostation 2, Ziosoft
Co, Tokyo) and image quality was evaluated by visual score at 10 places (RCA: #1,2,3,4
LAD: #5,6,7,8 CX: #11,13) based on American Heart Association classification
(Fig. 3). The visual evaluation items were three items of overall image
quality, sharpness, noise and artifacts, we evaluated them as 4-point grades
(grade “4” was excellent, “1” was severe) by two blinded readers (one
radiologist and one radiological technologist).Results & Discussion
Overall
image quality and sharpness for 3D nsbTFE were significantly higher than those
for TFE and bTFE. On the other hand, the noise artifact for 3D nsbTFE was significantly
decreased than that for TFE and bTFE. The signal noise ratio for 3D nsbTFE was
higher than TFE and bTFE. The banding artifacts were often seen on bTFE. Three
branches of coronary arteries could not be detected on bTFE. 3D nsbTFE successes
to shorten and can set up high flip angle. Consequently, contrast for coronary
arteries improved.
Conclusion
MRCA using nsbTFE can overcome weak points in
conventional balanced SSFP with 3 tesla while while
ensuring the image quality and high signal to noise ratio.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgements found.References
(1) Danias PG,Roussakis A,loannidis JP,et al: Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as
compared against conventional x-ray angiography: A meta-analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004
Nov 2; 44(9):1867-76.
(2) Kaul MG, Stork A, Bansmann PM,et
al: Evaluation of balanced steady-state free precession
(TrueFISP) and K-space segmented gradient echo sequences for
3D coronary MR angiography with navigator gating at 3 Tesla.Rofo.2004 Nov:176(11):1560-5.
(3)Thomas D1, Krug B, Hackmann D,et
al: MR-coronary angiography: comparison of SSFP
and spoiled GRE sequence (bright blood technique) and a TSE sequence (black
blood technique) in healthy volunteers. Rofo. 2004 Nov:176(11):1589-98.
(4) Ohyama K, Kubo H, Harada M,et
al: Comparison of 3 Tesla whole heart coronary MRA
(WHCA) with 1.5 Tesla. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Dec 20:64(12):1540-6.