High resolution MR angiography is important to properly visualize fine lesions in coronary arteries. In this work, we employ a time-efficient and motion-robust variable-density 3D cones trajectory for sub-millimeter data acquisition. Although the imaging data is severely undersampled, we capitalize on the diffuse aliasing properties of the non-Cartesian cones trajectory to separate the data into several respiratory phases for motion compensation. For improved image quality, we present and analyze a modified cones reordering strategy, mindful of balanced SSFP imaging and unwanted eddy current effects, for distributed k-space coverage irrespective of how the readouts are retrospectively sorted.
Sequence and Acquisition: Free-breathing, cardiac-gated 3D CMRA data and beat-to-beat 3D iNAVs are collected on a 1.5T GE scanner with a balanced SSFP (bSSFP) sequence (Figure 1). We use a VD cones trajectory designed for an isotropic spatial resolution of 0.98 mm. Specifically, we fully sample k-space up to 102 m-1, and undersample higher frequency information. The cones reordering technique determines the specific undersampling factor.
Cones Reordering: We adapt a phyllotaxis readout ordering scheme to maximize k-space coverage within each heartbeat, while avoiding eddy current effects in bSSFP imaging. The total number of readouts must be the product of a Fibonacci number and an integer specifying the number of cones per phyllotaxis segment. Previous work utilized a Fibonacci number of 610 and 18 cones per phyllotaxis segment for an acquisition with spatial and temporal resolution of 1.2 mm and 18 cones per heartbeat, respectively8. However, such parameters for the VD 0.98 mm trajectory results in eddy current artifacts (Figure 2(a)), as the mean l2 distance between adjacent readouts in each heartbeat is 14% larger than the case of a 1.2 mm acquisition (Figure 2(b)). Therefore, to reduce the jumping in k-space in the higher resolution regime, we implement reordering with a Fibonacci number of 377 and 30 readouts per phyllotaxis segment. A temporal resolution of 18 cones per heartbeat allows us to traverse 60% of the full k-space extent within each cardiac cycle. Note in this case that the number of cones per phyllotaxis segment does not equal the number of readouts per heartbeat. Thus, once readouts in one phyllotaxis segment are completed, the cone closest (in an l2 sense) to the last readout is selected as the starting point in the next phyllotaxis segment.
The modified cones ordering strategy for the VD 0.98 mm trajectory mitigates eddy current artifacts and provides uniform k-space coverage regardless of how the data is retrospectively binned (Figure 2(c) and Figure 3). For the number of readouts (11,310 = 377*30) associated with this reordering scheme, we utilize a sampling density in k-space periphery of 0.85. A fully sampled 0.98 mm cones trajectory requires 16,661 readouts.
Motion Correction: We compare two reconstruction pipelines for sub-millimeter VD coronary scans.
Our standard approach for correction has been autofocusing, in which 32 3D translational motion estimates are extracted from different ROIs on the 3D iNAVs, and independently applied to reconstruct a bank of motion-compensated images. Minimization of a gradient entropy metric across the 32 translationally corrected images yields the final image.
Alternatively, because of our novel reordering scheme for VD cones imaging, we are able to retrospectively bin the data and achieve pseudo-random undersampling in each bin, which facilitates PICS. Note also that PICS benefits from the favorable noise-like aliasing in an undersampled cones trajectory. Leveraging these advantages, a superior-inferior translational motion estimate of the heart is derived from the 3D iNAVs, and subsequently used to group the VD data into five bins from end-inspiration to end-expiration. Intrabin 3D translational correction is then performed, and a temporal total variation (TV) regularized PICS reconstruction framework is applied to resolve the different motion states.
[1] Gurney et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 55.3 (2006): 575-582.
[2] Addy et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 74.3 (2015): 1874-1883.
[3] Addy et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 77.5 (2017): 1874-1883.
[4] Cheng et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 68.6 (2012): 1785-1797.
[5] Luo et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 77.5 (2017): 1884-1893.
[6] Feng et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 75.2 (2016): 775-788.
[7] Piccini et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 77.4 (2017): 1473-1484.
[8] Malavé et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 00.0 (2018): 1-12.