Daniel Yakimenka1, Ahmed Abdelhaleem1, Alireza Sojoudi2, An Le2, David Patton1, James White1, and Julio Garcia 1
1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada
Synopsis
Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is a common
congenital disorder which is
treated by surgical repair. This study aimed to investigate alterations in blood flow in adults
with repaired TOF.
We hypothesized that abnormal remodeling of the right heart and the PA following
surgical repair leads to impaired blood flow distribution, increased wall shear
stress (WSS), greater energy loss (EL) and greater pressure drop (PD) in rTOF
adults.
This study contributes towards the understanding of blood flow hemodynamics after surgical repair.
Background
Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is a common
congenital disorder contributing to 9-14% of all congenital heart disease.1 TOF is
treated by surgical repair of the pulmonary infundibulum, a procedure known to
alter hemodynamic properties of blood flow in the right heart and pulmonary
artery (PA). This study aimed to investigate alterations in blood flow in adults
with repaired TOF (rTOF) in comparison to healthy volunteers using 4D flow MRI.
We hypothesized that abnormal remodeling of the right heart and the PA following
surgical repair leads to impaired blood flow distribution, increased wall shear
stress (WSS), greater energy loss (EL) and greater pressure drop (PD) in rTOF
adults.Methods
A total of 26 subjects were
retrospectively studied: 11 with rTOF (43% female, 35.8 ± 14.4) and 15 healthy controls
(44% female, 32.6 ±12.6). All subjects underwent a standard cardiac MRI inclusive
of 4D flow on a 3T scanner (Prisma, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a standardized protocol inclusive
of ECG-gated 4D flow with
adaptive navigator respiratory gating with whole heart coverage.2 4D flow imaging
parameters were: Venc= 1.5-2.0 m/s, TE= 2.61-3.14 ms, TR= 4.9-5.9 ms, FOV=
200-420 mm x 248-368 mm, spatial resolution = 1.9-3.5x2.0-3.2x1.8-3.5 mm3,
temporal resolution = 39-47 ms, and FA = 15°. Image processing was done exclusively using cvi42
(Circle Cardiovascular, Calgary, Version 5.9.0). Each 4D volume was
pre-processed for offset correction, eddy-currents and Maxwell terms (Fig.1A).
The PA, left ventricle (LV), and right ventricle (RV) were individually segmented
(Fig.1B). For RV and LV assessments, 2 cross sections were placed at
tricuspid and pulmonary valve, and mitral and aortic valve planes, respectively.
Flow component analysis (direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow, and residual volume), net flow, peak velocity, and regurgitant fraction
measurements were performed. For PA assessments, 5 cross-sections were placed in pre-defined anatomic landmarks (Fig.1C). Longitudinal WSS, radial WSS, WSS magnitude was measured
at each cross section. PD was measured in 4 cross sections relative to the pulmonary valve plane (Fig.1C). For EL measurements, a centerline was traced
from pulmonary valve to the left and right PA branches. All PA measurements were
taken at peak systole.Results
All subjects were successfully processed, segmented and analyzed. Functional blood flow component analysis in the LV and RV didn't identify differences between rTOF patients and controls. LV direct flow was diminished by mitral regurgitation fraction (r=-0.49, p=0.011). RV direct flow (r=-0.62, p=0.001) and retained inflow (r=-0.44, p=0.033) were diminished by pulmonary valve regurgitation fraction. Residual volume increased with pulmonary valve regurgitation severity (r=0.55, p=0.005). Peak velocity and radial WSS at the PAV,
as well as EL in both the RPA and LPA showed significant differences versus
controls (p ≤ 0.001) (Table 1). Overall subjects, peak velocity and radial WSS both correlated (r>0.5, p ≤ 0.01) with EL in the RPA
and LPA (Table 2).Conclusion
Functional blood flow component analysis was not able to detect differences between rTOF patients and controls. Whereas wall shear stress, energy loss and pressure drop identified abnormal hemodynamics in the pulmonary artery. This pilot study contributes for better understanding of flow biomarkers in patients with rTOF.
Acknowledgements
Mitac
IT07679 and IT07680.References
1. Valbuena-Lopez et al. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Reports 2018; 11:9.
2. Markl et al. JMRI 2007;25:824-831.