Aodan Zhang1, Jie Bian 1, Jiawen Luo 1, Chuanwen Yu1, and Lizhi Xie2
1The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 2GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Objective
to investigate the
diagnostic value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in benign and malignant
breast lesions. At present, Imaging diagnosis of benign and malignant breast
nodules mainly focuses on morphology and hemodynamics to reflect the
characteristics of lesions. This study intends to
reflect the characteristics and changes of microstructure in breast tissues at
molecular level by quantitative parameters of DKI, which provides an effective
basis for early detection and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer.
Introduction
With
the change of lifestyle, the incidence of breast cancer is on the rise[1]. Early
detection and treatment are of great significance to reduce the mortality of
breast cancer. Diffusion
kurtosis imaging (DKI), has shown promise in providing useful information in
diagnosis of breast lesions, but the diagnostic performance of DKI needs to be
further explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic
value of DKI quantitative parameters in benign and malignant breast lesions.Material and Methods
A total of Sixty patients prior to operations
were enrolled in this study. Ethical approval and consent forms were obtained.
All the subjects underwent MR exams on a 3T MR scanner (Discovery MR750W,
GEHealthcare, USA). MR sequences included routine
breast sequences as well as DWI (b=0,800s/mm2)
and DKI (b=0, 1000, 2000s/mm2 , 15 diffusion directions). Images analyses were performed
on GE AW4.6 Workstation by two radiologists, who were blinded to the pathologic
results .
The ROIs
were manually placed on the maximal section of each lesion, carefully to avoid the area of cystic degeneration,
necrosis and bleeding. Finally, the DKI parameters including fractional anisotropy(FA),
mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity(Da), radial diffusivity(Dr), mean
kurtosis(MK), axial kurtosis(Ka), and radial kurtosis(Kr) were measured. 1-sample K-S test and independent sample T-test were
applied to investigate the statistical significance of the results. The area
under the operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was calculated to evaluate
the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter on benign and malignant breast
lesions. The optimal threshold of each parameter and the corresponding youden
index, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.Results
A total of 62 lesions were detected, including 30
cases of malignant lesions. There were 3 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, 26
cases of invasive ductal carcinoma, 1 case of basal cell-like carcinoma; 32
cases of benign lesions, including 25 cases of fibroadenoma, 1 case of
granulomatous mastitis, 4 cases of intraductal papilloma
and 2 cases of cyst. Figure 1 shows representative cases of malignant and
benign lesions illustrating the placement of ROI. The values
of MK, Ka and Kr in benign lesions were lower than those in malignant lesions,
and the values of MD, Da, Dr,FAK and ADC in benign lesions were higher than
those in malignant lesions (P < 0.05). However, FA showed correlation
between and benign and malignant breast lesions. as shown in Figure 2. The
areas under curve(AUC) of MK, Ka, Kr, MD, FA, FAK, Da, Dr and ADC were 0.967, 0.889,
0.867, 0.958, 0.506, 0.651, 0.954, 0.942 and 0.827 respectively. ROC curves
indicated that MK shows the highest AUC. Highest sensitivity and specificity
parameters were MK and Ka (0.933.0.941) respectively, as shown in Figure 3.
Discussion
MRI has been widely used in the diagnosis of breast
diseases. DKI, which can reflect the diffusion of tissue water molecules and
the complexity of tissue structure, has been investigated for in differentiating
benign and malignant breast lesions[2]. The results of this study show that DKI parameters
have statistical significance in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant
breast lesions. The area under curve (AUC) of these parameters were higher than
that of ADC, indicating higher diagnostic efficiency. MK has the highest
diagnostic ability and sensitivity among all parameters, and is significantly
higher than ADC value. MK is determined by the complexity of ROI structure
selected. Compared with benign lesions, breast malignant lesions have more
complex microstructure, deviate from Gaussian distribution and higher MK value.
Traditional DWI sequence is a single exponential model. Based on the hypothesis
of microenvironment homogeneity, it is considered that the diffusion of water
molecules in biological tissues follows the Gauss distribution model. In breast
cancer, the attenuation of DWI signal with b value does not satisfy the single
exponential curve, but is a more complex non-Gauss dispersion form. DKI is a
new technique that conforms to the non-Gauss distribution, As
a new technology conforming to non-Gauss distribution, DKI can more objectively
reflect the diffusion of water molecules in vivo, and can provide relatively
real information about the microstructure of tissues[3]. Therefore, compared with
traditional DWI, DKI can more accurately reflect the characteristics of
microenvironment and water diffusion in tumor, and increase the ability to
differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions.Conclusion
DKI
showed better diagnosis efficacy than DWI differential diagnosis of benign and
malignant breast lesions. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Sun K,Chen X, Chai W, et al. Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR
Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic
Factors.[J]. Radiology, 2015, 277(1):46-55.
[2]
Huang Y, Lin Y, Hu W, et al. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging
Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
[J].J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Sep 8.
[3]Li
T, Yu T, Li L, et al. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors. [J].J
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May 2.