Yuzhen Zhao1, Jianli Zhou1, Jiaqi Liu1, Shaoming Zhou1, Yungen Gan1, Weiguo Cao1, and Mengzhu Wang2
1Shenzhen children’s hospital, Shenzhen, China, 2Siemens Healthcare, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
This study investigated the accuracy of MRI in
quantifying liver fat of 86 Chinese children and adolescents, with magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as reference. MRI and MRS were performed with
multi-echo Dixon (ME Dixon) and HISTO sequence respectively to calculate
hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed
using MRS-PDFF > 5% as threshold. Spearman analysis indicated excellent
correlation between ME Dixon and MRS (r>0.9,P<0.01). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good
agreement between these two methods, indicating that ME Dixon can be an
accurate way to detect hepatic steatosis in children and adolescents.
Introduction
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is
currently the outstanding cause of chronic liver disease in children and
adolescents, especially in overweight and obese groups. Liver biopsy is the
reference standard to diagnosis NAFLD but invasive, thus is not the best choice
in clinical diagnose and follow-up. MR is widely used in clinical trials to
noninvasively quantify liver fat which is suitable for children. Besides, MR
can be used in early diagnosis and follow-up of NAFLD. While currently it is
rarely used in Chinese children and adolescents.This study aims to investigate the accuracy of ME
Dixon in quantify liver fat with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as
reference. A secondary goal was to assess the prevalence of NAFLD in overweight
and obese Chinese children and adolescents.Methods
There were 86 children and adolescents enrolled in this
study (mean age 13.6±1.9 years, range 9-17 years), including 65 overweight and
obese children (BMI above age and gender-specific 85th/95th percentile) and 21 age-
and sex-matched healthy children. They underwent MRI and MRS scan with a 3T
scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens, Healthcare, Erlangen, German). MRI and MRS were
performed with multi-echo Dixon (ME Dixon) and HISTO sequence respectively to
calculate hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF).
Hepatic steatosis was diagnosed using MRS-PDFF > 5% as threshold. Spearman
analysis was used to evaluate the correlation of ME Dixon and MRS. The
agreement between these two methods was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. According
to the liver classification results of MRS-PDFF, sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)
were calculated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Dixon-PDFF. Results
The ME Dixon-PDFF in MRS
ROI and the entire liver were 9.9 ± 10.3% with range 0.3% - 39.9%, and 10.6 ±
9.4 % with range 1.9% - 38.9%, respectively. The MRS-PDFF was 9.1 ± 10.0%, with
range 0.5% - 37.8%. The incidence of hepatic steatosis detected by MRS-PDFF was
46.5% (40/86) of all participants, all of them belonged to overweight and obese
group. Spearman analysis indicated excellent correlation between ME Dixon and
MRS (r>0.9,P<0.01) (Fig 1).
Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between these two methods. With
MRS-PDFF as reference, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Dixon-PDFF were 95%, 100%, 100%, 94.9% based
on ROI at the same location of MRS, and 97.5%, 88.6%,
90.7%, 96.9% covering entire liver. Four groups of typical
Dixon-PDFF maps and matching MRS with varying percentages of PDFF values are
presented in Fig 2.Discussion
In this prospective study of Chinese children and
adolescents, 3T MRI with ME Dixon sequence accurately quantified liver fat
content, with MRS (HISTO sequence) as reference. PDFF measured by ME Dixon and
MRS had been validated to assess liver fat content successfully and accurately
and demonstrate excellent correlation with liver biopsy (1). In our study, we observed a strong correlation between
Dixon-PDFF and MRS-PDFF. Bland-Altman analysis also illustrated good agreement between these two
methods. They are consistent with previous studies (2, 3), indicating that Dixon-based technique could be
potentially used to quantify liver fat content for whole liver coverage. With MRS-PDFF
> 5% differentiating hepatic steatosis from normal fat fraction in our study,
ME Dixon achieved a good sensitivity and specificity in quantifying liver fat
content. Moreover, it showed high potential in early detection of hepatic
steatosis. As MRI can directly assess the entire liver fat content, thereby
avoiding sampling errors when liver fat are inhomogeneous distributions.
One limitation of this study is that previous study
demonstrated that the best method to measure Dixon-PDFF was calculating the
average value of ROI in nine Couinaud segment (4), while the Dixon-PDFF of this study was measured
with ROI only at MRS location and the
entire liver. A segmented measurement could be considered in the future study.Conclusion
ME Dixon shows excellent correlation and agreement
with MRS in quantifying liver fat content and could be a potential tool to
detect hepatic steatosis in Chinese children and adolescents.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kang BK, Kim M,
Song SY, Jun DW, Jang K. Feasibility of modified Dixon MRI techniques for
hepatic fat quantification in hepatic disorders: validation with MRS and
histology. The British journal of radiology. 2017:20170378.
2. Hetterich H, Bayerl C, Peters A,
Heier M, Linkohr B, Meisinger C, et al. Feasibility of a three-step magnetic
resonance imaging approach for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in an
asymptomatic study population. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(6):1895-904.
3. Heba ER, Desai A, Zand KA,
Hamilton G, Wolfson T, Schlein AN, et al. Accuracy and the effect of possible
subject-based confounders of magnitude-based MRI for estimating hepatic proton
density fat fraction in adults, using MR spectroscopy as reference. Journal of
magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI. 2016;43(2):398-406.
4. Campo C, Hernando D, Schubert T,
Bookwalter C, Pay A, Reeder S. Standardized Approach for ROI-Based Measurements
of Proton Density Fat Fraction and R2* in the Liver. AJR American journal of
roentgenology. 2017;209(3):592-603.