Jinning Li1, Huanhuan Liu1, Caiyuan Zhang1, Shuyan Yang1, Yanshu Wang1, Weibo Chen2, Xin Li3, and Dengbin Wang1
1Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 3GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
To investigate
the performances of native T1 mapping for noninvasively assessing liver
fibrosis, including repeatability, reproducibility, and staging and monitoring
the process of fibrosis, and to compare them with those of acoustic radiation
force impulse (ARFI) elastography. The
results of our experimental study suggest that native T1 mapping may be a
reliable, accurate, and noninvasive tool for assessing liver fibrosis. Compared
with ARFI elastography, native T1 mapping is a more robust quantitative
technique with similar performances for staging fibrosis. Furthermore, it has a
higher accuracy for monitoring liver fibrosis, especially for detecting
fibrosis regression.
Introduction
Native T1 mapping, also called pre-contrast T1 mapping, has been shown a
promising potential for noninvasively assessing liver fibrosis by previous
studies 1,2. Native T1 mapping is a quick sequence and could be
acquired within one breath-holding. It is implemented without additional
hardware, which is the limitation of magnetic resonance elastopraphy, and could
examine more volumes of the liver tissues than ultrasound-based elastography. However,
its reliability and accuracy still need to be evaluated and compared with currently
widely used noninvasive methods−elastography. Thus, the aim of this study was
to investigate the performances of native T1 mapping for noninvasively
assessing liver fibrosis, including repeatability, reproducibility, and staging
and monitoring the process of fibrosis, and to compare them with those of acoustic
radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography. Methods
Eight healthy SD rats were performed native T1 mapping and ARFI elastography
in the liver three times. Native T1 values and shear wave velocity (SWV) were
measured. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and within-subject
coefficient of variation (WsCV) were calculated to evaluate the repeatability
and reproducibility of quantitative parameters. Fifty-two SD rats were used to
induce different stages of liver fibrosis with carbon tetrachloride. METAVIR
system (F0–F4) was used as standard reference. Mixed model analysis of variance
and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were adopted
to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of native T1 values and SWV
for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (F4). Another 16 rats with liver fibrosis underwent both
imaging examinations before (session 1) and after (session 2) the progression/regression
of fibrosis to evaluate the values of quantitative parameters for detecting
fibrosis progression/regression in the liver using by using Wilcoxon
signed-rank test and AUC.Results
Native T1 values and SWV shared a similarly good repeatability
(ICC=0.95, WsCV=3.59–4.15%), while native T1 values (ICC=0.79,
WsCV=4.53%) demonstrated a better
reproducibility than SWV (ICC=0.64;WsCV=8.63%). As Fig. 1 displayed, with the advance of fibrosis
stage, both the quantitative parameters increased significantly
(P<0.001). Native T1 values showed a
high accuracy for diagnosing significant liver fibrosis (≥F2, AUC=0.84) as well
as liver cirrhosis (F4, AUC=0.84), similar with SWV (≥F2,
AUC=0.81; F4, AUC=0.86 ). As shown
in Fig. 2-3, both native T1 values and SWV increased significantly (P≤0.041) after
the progression of liver fibrosis, while only native T1 values decreased
significantly (P=0.002) after the regression of fibrosis. For monitoring liver
fibrosis, native T1 values yielded a better accuracy for detecting fibrosis
progression (AUC=0.75) and regression (AUC=0.99) than SWV (progression,
AUC=0.7; regression, AUC=0.56).Discussion and Conclusion
The results of our experimental study suggest that native T1 mapping may
be a reliable, accurate, and noninvasive tool for assessing liver fibrosis.
Compared with ARFI elastography, native T1 mapping is a more robust
quantitative technique with similar performances for staging fibrosis.
Furthermore, it has a higher accuracy for monitoring liver fibrosis, especially
for detecting fibrosis regression.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Banerjee
R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for
the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol.2014;60(1):69-77.
2. Pavlides
M, Banerjee R, Sellwood J, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
predicts clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease. J Hepatol.2016;64(2):308-315.