Robert R Edelman1,2, Emily A Aherne1, Sangtae Park3, Jianing Pang4, and Ioannis Koktzoglou1,5
1Radiology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 2Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, United States, 4Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Chicago, IL, United States, 5Radiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Kidney stones affect 1 in 11 people in the United States and renal
colic resulting from obstructing stones is a frequent cause of emergency
department visits. Non-contrast CT of
the abdomen and pelvis is the primary imaging test but has the drawback of
exposing the patient to potentially significant amounts of ionizing radiation. A motion-corrected proton density-weighted
in-phase stack-of-stars (PDIP SOS) FLASH pulse sequence was developed to
provide a potential imaging alternative.
Using this approach, we have demonstrated for the first time the
feasibility of using MRI to detect kidney stones with image quality that is
competitive to CT.
INTRODUCTION
Acute renal colic is a debilitating condition caused by an
obstructing kidney stone. It typically
presents with severe flank pain, nausea and vomiting. Kidney
stones affect 1 in 11 people in the United States1 and renal colic resulting from obstructing stones is a
frequent cause of emergency department visits.
While there are several different types of kidney stones, approximately
90% are composed of calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate. Non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis is
the primary imaging test used for initial diagnosis. It is also used to evaluate the size and
location of renal and ureteral stones, which is key to patient management as
this information determines the likelihood of spontaneous stone passage without
surgical intervention.2 Non-contrast CT has proven highly accurate
for stones >3 mm in diameter. However,
the use of CT entails a substantial radiation dose, especially in patients with
large BMI, and multiple CT scans are required in a subset of patients due to
recurrent disease. This is particularly
undesirable given the relatively young age of many of these patients, with the
peak incidence for nephrolithiasis at 20–49 years.3 While MR
urography can demonstrate an obstructing stone within a dilated ureter, no MR
imaging technique has yet proved adequate for imaging stones within the kidneys
or a non-obstructed ureter.
Recently, a motion-insensitive proton density-weighted
in-phase stack-of-stars (PDIP SOS) FLASH pulse sequence proved competitive to
CT for the delineation of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications.4 We hypothesized that this technique, after
incorporating motion correction using a diaphragm navigator or self-navigation
to compensate for displacement of the kidneys during respiration, could be used
to image kidney stones even in the absence of an obstructed collecting system.METHODS
This IRB-approved study was conducted in healthy volunteers
and one patient with documented renal stone disease on a 3 Tesla scanner
(MAGNETOM Skyrafit, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Following scout imaging, a prototype PDIP SOS
FLASH sequence was acquired through both kidneys with 600 to 1000 radial views,
64 to 96 slices, echo spacing = 5.0 msec, in-phase TE = 2.46 msec, flip angle =
2.5 degrees, isotropic spatial resolution ~ 1.2-mm x 1.2-mm x 1.2-mm. Motion correction was performed using a
cross-pair diaphragm navigator with a 3-mm acceptance window or self-navigated retrospective
respiratory gating using a 50% acceptance window. Images
were viewed as 3-mm thick minimum intensity projections in multiple
orientations.RESULTS
Scan time for the motion-corrected technique was
approximately 10 to 12 minutes. The PDIP
SOS FLASH sequence produced images in which the renal parenchymal tissues, fat,
blood vessels, and ureters showed a uniform, intermediate signal
intensity. In volunteers, delineation of
the renal margins was substantially improved by use of motion correction. In the patient study, navigator-gated PDIP
SOS FLASH demonstrated a 7-mm calculus in the right kidney and 5-mm calculus in
the left kidney comparably to non-contrast CT (Figure 1). Use of motion correction substantially improved
the edge definition of the calculi, particularly in the head-to-foot direction (Figure 2).DISCUSSION
Conventional MRI pulse sequences generate kidney images in
which a variety of signal intensities coexist, making it problematic to
confidently identify a small, low-signal kidney stone. Ultra-short TE imaging techniques have been
used successfully to characterize kidney stones in vitro but not in patients.
PDIP radial VIBE has several
advantages for imaging of kidney stones: (1) it produces high contrast between
low-signal stones and renal tissues; (2) it permits isotropic imaging with
small voxels, necessary to avoid partial volume averaging between small stones
and surround tissue; and (3) it suppresses artifacts from bowel motion that
might otherwise obscure a small stone. Unlike
the aorto-iliac vessels, which are relatively stationary, the kidneys typically
move several centimeters over the course of the respiratory cycle. Consequently, it proved essential to correct
for respiratory motion using either a diaphragm navigator or self-navigation,
despite the intrinsic motion insensitivity of the technique. CONCLUSION
We have demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of
using MRI to detect kidney stones with image quality that is competitive to
CT. While further study is needed to
determine the accuracy of the technique and to further improve imaging
efficiency, motion-corrected PDIP SOS FLASH has the potential to eventually provide
a safe, radiation-free alternative to CT in the evaluation of patients with
kidney stone disease.Acknowledgements
FUNDING SOURCES: NIH grants R01 HL137920 and R01 HL130093References
1. Scales et al. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(1):160.
2. Brisbane et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2016; 13(11): 654.
3. Aggarwal et al. EMJ Urol. 2017;5(1):98.
4. Serhal et al. J Cardiovas Mag Reson. 2018; 20:15.