Bahareh Behzadnezhad1,2, Nader Behdad1, and Alan B. McMillan2,3
1Electrical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
A novel material characterization
approach which is based on a microstrip line test fixture paired with deep
learning analysis, is presented to optimize the use of additive manufacturing (3D-printing)
in constructing the structure of MRI coils with arbitrary 3D geometries. This
type of manufacturing is appealing because it can be used to construct
geometries that are time-consuming and expensive to make using traditional
machining methods. Full-wave electromagnetic simulations are efficient and
promising technique to expedite the design process of MRI coils and therefore,
it is crucial to include the electrical properties of 3D-printed materials in
the electromagnetic simulations because it affects coil performance.
Purpose
3D-printing is a low-cost and
rapid means to construct MRI coils with arbitrary 3D geometries [1]–[3].
RF coil design in MRI requires the knowledge of electromagnetic field
distribution. This is achieved now by using full-wave electromagnetic (EM)
simulations. To simulate an optimized coil, it is necessary to include the
material properties (e.g., dielectric constant, loss tangent) of the coil
components because the response of a non-magnetic material to EM waves depends primarily
on the dielectric constant and loss tangent of the material. 3D-printed
polymers are non-standardized materials and their electrical properties are
likely to vary between manufacturers, which can affect coil performance. There
are many approaches to measure dielectric properties of materials [4].
However, all of these approaches have limitations for characterizing 3D-printed
polymers at MRI relevant frequencies. In recent work [3],
a test fixture for material characterization was proposed utilizing EM simulations
along with the S-parameter measurements to characterize the dielectric
properties of 3D-printed materials at MRI related frequencies. This method of
characterization, although achieving accurate results, can be very time-consuming
due to the computational requirements of EM simulations. Using deep learning
approaches can reduce the computational time significantly. The goal of this
study is to propose a broadband (applicable to MRI frequencies) and simple to
build test fixture applicable to 3D-printed materials and use the power of deep
learning to perform rapid material characterization and find accurate results
from the estimated scattering parameters. Methods
The proposed test fixture is a microstrip transmission line terminated
with a parallel plate capacitor. The material under test (MUT) serves as the
dielectric between the capacitor plates as shown in Figure 1. Any change in the
dielectric constant or loss inside the MUT results in a change in the magnitude
and phase of the reflection coefficient (S11) measured by a vector
network analyzer (VNA) connected to the microstrip transmission line. This
change was used to characterize the material between the capacitor plates. EM simulations
of the test fixture were developed and performed in CST Microwave Studio using
frequency and parameter sweep solvers with two parameters: MUT dielectric
constant and MUT loss tangent. The range of simulated dielectric constant
(relative permittivity) was from 1 to 5 which is an expected range for polymers
and from 0.001 to 0.05 for loss tangent. Because 3D-printed materials are
typically low-dispersive, the changes in their dielectric properties are
negligible in the simulated range of frequencies and can be assumed independent
of frequency [4].
The dataset consisted of 2091 S11 calculated from EM
simulations, each with 200 frequency samples in the range of 5-500 MHz. The
data was processed in Python using Tensorflow. Data was split into three sets:
training (1504 data), validation (377 data), and testing (210). Figure 2 shows the
neural network used in this study. The Adam optimizer and mean squared error
(MSE) loss were used to train the model. To achieve better performance in
predicting the loss tangent values the input data was represented with
magnitude in dB scale, real, and imaginary values because the small changes in
magnitude of S11 due to a change in loss tangent was much more
distinguishable in the magnitude in dB scale. Results
Figure 3 shows different coils
constructed based on 3D-printing. Figure 4 shows the predicted values vs. actual values
for dielectric constant and loss tangent. The r-squared value for prediction of
dielectric constant was 0.999 and was 0.998 for loss tangent which demonstrates
strong performance of our model. Discussion and Conclusion
Additive manufacturing has
provided new means to accurately construct patient/anatomy-specific medical
devices. The use of this type of manufacturing in the development of MRI
devices is highly appealing and It is important to measure electrical
properties of the 3D-printed materials before using in MRI RF coils because of
the potential effects they might have on the coil performance. The actual 3D
field profile of a coil depends on the response of all materials used in the
coil and it is a less than ideal time for modifications to be made after the
coil was built. This abstract, demonstrates a rapid approach applicable to
3D-printed materials and MRI frequencies to measure the dielectric properties
of dielectric materials by utilizing deep learning to perform estimation of electrical
properties of materials from an easy to build test fixture (which cannot be
readily analyzed using conventional approaches). Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] S. Wei, Z.
Wang, H. Wang, X. Lyu, L. Deng, and W. Yang, “Design and implementation of MRI
RF coil based on 3D printing,” in 2015 IEEE MTT-S 2015 International
Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and
Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), 2015, pp. 222–224.
[2] K.-H.
Herrmann, C. Gärtner, D. Güllmar, M. Krämer, and J. R. Reichenbach, “3D
printing of MRI compatible components: Why every MRI research group should have
a low-budget 3D printer,” Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 36, no. 10, pp.
1373–1380, Oct. 2014.
[3] B.
Behzadnezhad, B. D. Collick, N. Behdad, and A. B. McMillan, “Dielectric
properties of 3D-printed materials for anatomy specific 3D-printed MRI coils,” J.
Magn. Reson., vol. 289, pp. 113–121, Apr. 2018
[4] P. I.
Deffenbaugh, R. C. Rumpf, and K. H. Church, “Broadband Microwave Frequency
Characterization of 3-D Printed Materials,” IEEE Trans. Components, Packag.
Manuf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 2147–2155, Dec. 2013.